Originally posted by: TheBDB
77 posts a day? Get a fvcking life.
Man, you have 2300 posts in a MONTH. They should ban you just out of concern for your own health.Originally posted by: ribbon13
Kinda like all those women who would vote to end womens suffrage?
Originally posted by: piroroadkill
Older than the internet.
Lock and ban.
Originally posted by: ribbon13
Most of them are from helping people in GH... and for the last 4 years I worked 14.4 hours a day. What's wrong with spending all day on AT after that?
Well, let's say each of your posts took you 3 minutes to write. That's 6900 minutes spent on the forums in ~30 days. You spent 115 hours out of 672 this month posting on AnandTech.Originally posted by: ribbon13
Most of them are from helping people in GH... and for the last 4 years I worked 14.4 hours a day. What's wrong with spending all day on AT after that?
Originally posted by: yllus
Well, let's say each of your posts took you 3 minutes to write. That's 6900 minutes spent on the forums in ~30 days. You spent 115 hours out of 672 this month posting on AnandTech.Originally posted by: ribbon13
Most of them are from helping people in GH... and for the last 4 years I worked 14.4 hours a day. What's wrong with spending all day on AT after that?
That means there was a 17% chance that you were in the midst of making a post here at any given time in February. That is SICK. Get HELP!
Wow that guy must have hemorroids.Originally posted by: yllus
Well, let's say each of your posts took you 3 minutes to write. That's 6900 minutes spent on the forums in ~30 days. You spent 115 hours out of 672 this month posting on AnandTech.Originally posted by: ribbon13
Most of them are from helping people in GH... and for the last 4 years I worked 14.4 hours a day. What's wrong with spending all day on AT after that?
That means there was a 17% chance that you were in the midst of making a post here at any given time in February. That is SICK. Get HELP!
Research conducted by award-winning U.S. scientist Nathan Zohner concluded that roughly 86 percent of the population supports a ban on dihydrogen monoxide. Although his results are preliminary, Zohner believes people need to pay closer attention to the information presented to them regarding Dihydrogen Monoxide. He adds that if more people knew the truth about DHMO then studies like the one he conducted would not be necessary.
Originally posted by: ribbon13
http://www.textbookleague.org/113glob.htm
Originally posted by: TheBDB
77 posts a day? Get a fvcking life.