Bethesda collaborating with AMD

Discussion in 'AMD' started by MajinCry, Feb 28, 2017.

  1. MajinCry

    MajinCry Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2015
    Messages:
    2,391
    Likes Received:
    522
    Holy hell you guys. If we're lucky, Skyrim SE and Fallout 4 will get a Vulkan renderer. And if we're suuuuper lucky? Bethesda will backport Vulkan to New Vegas and fam. That'd be the day, eh?

    https://twitter.com/bethesda/status/836688120846381059
    [​IMG]

    http://www.pcworld.com/article/3174...-vulkan-cozies-up-to-a-geforce-now-rival.html
    Keep in mind that Bethesda also said that they'd be adding a D3D12 renderer to ESO. They never touched on it again, but maybe, juuuuust maybe, we'll see D3D12's more tolerant brother be given the reigns.

    https://www.ticgn.com/elder-scrolls-online-directx-12-patch-in-the-works/

     
  2. ThatBuzzkiller

    ThatBuzzkiller Senior member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2014
    Messages:
    798
    Likes Received:
    70
    AMD should focus their energy on upcoming releases instead of opening up the wounds with old games when these older revisions of the game engines just aren't very compatible with DX12 in terms of performance gains ...

    In due time AMD's mistakes will be forgiven as more games come out just like how people are now forgiving AMD's blunder on Bulldozer with Ryzen ...

    Credit to them for getting the entirety of Zenimax Media on board since I though they would've been the few very late publishers to do a transition ...
     
  3. MajinCry

    MajinCry Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2015
    Messages:
    2,391
    Likes Received:
    522
    If they are backporting Vulkan, Bethesda's games are exactly the ones that should get it. Have you tried bumping up the shadow distance in Fallout 4, and seeing how many draw calls are being made? Put them at 20000 and look at Lexington. Report back how many draw calls you get :D

    Hell, if you go to Riverwood, stop at the entrance to the blacksmith and turn around, the game will make over 3k draw calls on Direct3D 9. That's beyond bad.

    Or in Fallout 3, go to downtown DC. Notice how it's split up into separate parts? Draw calls are the reason for that. If you just go to where the Talon Company mercenaries fight the Super Mutants, a ways away from Super Duper Mart, you'll make >3k draw calls easy. I remember getting 6.5k at one point, and boy was that slow.

    In New Vegas, the world was initially going to be designed seamless. Freeside & The Strip were going to be placed directly in the worldspace, but had to be segmented later in development due to the sheer number of draw calls being issued. Even just combining Freeside and The Strip into one cell throttles the framerate.

    In Oblivion, the Imperial Market District @ Noon whilst raining, will bring even an i5 2500k to it's knees, when you have shadows and reflections enabled. Forward rendering redraws the whole scene as many times as there are lights. And when you have reflections enabled, the final scene is drawn again.

    These games are prime examples of draw calls being the main limiter on performance. And don't forget how massive the community is for them. Just take a look at the modding community on NexusMods.

    [​IMG]

    Myself? I sure bloody hope we get Vulkan backported. Not counting on it, but man...Tale Of Two Wastelands with open cities? Sign me up doc.
     
  4. ThatBuzzkiller

    ThatBuzzkiller Senior member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2014
    Messages:
    798
    Likes Received:
    70
    It's a pretty big stretch to claim that driver overhead is the cause of all the performance problems or design decisions in the Bethesda games you mentioned ...

    Really hard to isolate the issues in each of these cases. Shadow rendering depends more than just the GPU submission overhead, it also depends on the GPU's effective triangle rate and the rasterizer. Why they segment these areas could be for other reasons as well such consoles (didn't have a lot of memory), reduce streaming traffic (PCIE was fairly bandwidth limited at the time), or they have lot's of object oriented code that could really kill CPU performance ...
     
  5. Mopetar

    Mopetar Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    4,111
    Likes Received:
    331
    Hopefully this means that Bethesda's next games have a new and overhauled engine. FO4 wasn't exactly bad looking, but you could tell how dated it was and it didn't run all that well for how it looked.

    Fallout and Elder Scrolls are some of the biggest franchises around right now, especially after Skyrim's popularity. Given that both of the major consoles are going with AMD yet again for their refreshes/updates/whatever, it makes a certain amount of sense for Bethesda to work with AMD to get the most out of that hardware.
     
  6. tamz_msc

    tamz_msc Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2017
    Messages:
    2,039
    Likes Received:
    1,681
    All of Bethesda Game Studios' problems with performance and visual fidelity would disappear is they just ditch their Gamebryo-based Creation Engine for good.
     
  7. tential

    tential Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2008
    Messages:
    7,363
    Likes Received:
    640
    I would be brought to literal tears if this supported Vulkan, crossfire, and mods. I'm not kidding literal tears of joy.

    4k gaming for the whole series with maxed out graphic omg... Please give it to me Bethesda
     
    gradoman likes this.
  8. Headfoot

    Headfoot Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Messages:
    4,294
    Likes Received:
    542
    can you imagine an ES5 that's nearly as performant (with allowances made due to the closed room vs open world difference) as Doom Vulkan? Talk about the biggest performance ranking change. From near the bottom to near the top. I really hope that this "Vulkan for Bethesda" doesn't mean "Vulkan for Bethesda* (the publisher but not the game studio)"
     
  9. Despoiler

    Despoiler Golden Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,683
    Likes Received:
    524
    This is probably the biggest coup I think I can remember. Choosing Vulkan over DX12 can't be taken lightly. I want so badly to see ESO go to Vulkan. MMOs with large scale PvP badly need these next gen APIs. If ESO goes Vulkan it's going to shift the entire MMO industry to next gen APIs.

    Official AMD release
    http://www.amd.com/en-us/press-releases/Pages/amd-and-bethesda-2017feb28.aspx
     
    #9 Despoiler, Mar 1, 2017
    Last edited: Mar 1, 2017
    Bacon1 likes this.
  10. tential

    tential Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2008
    Messages:
    7,363
    Likes Received:
    640
    Ya, I'm just imagining this series running at Doom levels of performance.
    Lawd....
    Doom Vulkan should have changed every developers minds INSTANTLY.

    The downsides of doing that... I don't know what they are? I'll buy a slower GPU for 1080p gaming? (Not likely!!!)
     
  11. MajinCry

    MajinCry Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2015
    Messages:
    2,391
    Likes Received:
    522
    I wonder if we'd see any ENB Series mods for the Vulkan versions.

    But eh, not having ENB in exchange for proper draw distances? I'll cope.
     
  12. EXCellR8

    EXCellR8 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    2,383
    Likes Received:
    409
    At least they're doing the right thing with Prey... cryengine is a wonderful thing
     
  13. ThatBuzzkiller

    ThatBuzzkiller Senior member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2014
    Messages:
    798
    Likes Received:
    70
    If AMD is in a partnership with besthesda then they should push for as many of their own vender extensions in games as possible and purposefully write slow paths for their competitors if they were smart enough ...
     
  14. w3rd

    w3rd Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2017
    Messages:
    255
    Likes Received:
    61
    AMD should worry about the future, not people looking to play older (nostalgic) games. Can't live your life in the past, it is 2017 now, and 2018 games are only 9 months away...
     
  15. Yakk

    Yakk Golden Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    1,574
    Likes Received:
    272
    This sounds awesome, and AMD has actually done this before...

    It reminds me... Of when AMD did this with Square Enix when they created a plugin Mantel Module for the old Unreal Engine 3 for Thief. The game may not be everyone's cup of tea, but technically the Crossfire Mantle version was excellent with massive CPU multi-threading and incredibly smooth, and eerily responsive, gameplay.

    I'm thinking AMD must be working on a similar plugin for Bethesda's old engine. Either just for the CPU threading (probably), but it would be nice to have Vulcan and/or DX12 api too.
     
  16. Bacon1

    Bacon1 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2016
    Messages:
    3,430
    Likes Received:
    1,007
    Well them updating their engine would make new games run better as well ;)
     
  17. Malogeek

    Malogeek Golden Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2017
    Messages:
    1,314
    Likes Received:
    734
    I can't see them doing anything with their current released games but solely working on their games in development and future ones. Doesn't make much sense to go back and spend a LOT of resources remaking their aged engines for Vulkan.

    This should be taken as it is, huge news for all gamers no matter what their hardware for future titles from their studios. And a bonus for AMD owners with current hardware.
     
  18. MajinCry

    MajinCry Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2015
    Messages:
    2,391
    Likes Received:
    522
    Aye, it's probably wishful thinking entirely, but god damn it would be sooooo good.
     
    Malogeek likes this.
  19. SPBHM

    SPBHM Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2012
    Messages:
    4,659
    Likes Received:
    213
    not surprising give Doom Vulkan

    I think Fallout 4 Vulkan would be an interesting exercise, but probably doesn't make much sense at this point... I think this is more for future games
     
  20. tential

    tential Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2008
    Messages:
    7,363
    Likes Received:
    640
    Under what grounds does Fallout 4 not make sense....
     
  21. MajinCry

    MajinCry Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2015
    Messages:
    2,391
    Likes Received:
    522
    Money wise. I could see it happening with Skyrim Legendary Edition, since it's a recent release that is not really populated in contrast to the original. It has somewhat better performance due to D3D 11, but none of the cool mods that require the script extender.

    But having vastly better performance, with an extremely high object density cap, would sway many more I'd wager. We'd be able to mod the game's world that much more.
     
  22. Flapdrol1337

    Flapdrol1337 Golden Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2014
    Messages:
    1,674
    Likes Received:
    92
    Does fallout support 21:9 yet? Or do we have to mod?
     
  23. Malogeek

    Malogeek Golden Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2017
    Messages:
    1,314
    Likes Received:
    734
    Skyrim SE doesn't even support 21:9
     
  24. MajinCry

    MajinCry Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2015
    Messages:
    2,391
    Likes Received:
    522
    Have ta mod it. Fallout 4 doesn't support 5:4 or 4:3 either, unlike Skyrim and friends.

    Luckily, it's an easy fix. Just got to edit a few numbers in the .swf files, and edit the vertices in the interface's quad mesh.
     
  25. Valantar

    Valantar Golden Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2014
    Messages:
    1,722
    Likes Received:
    436
    Bethesda is a very prolific game developer and publisher. While this might be for backporting to already released games, what is damn sure is that it'll come into play for upcoming releases.
    Considering that Skyrim is still among the 10 most played games on steam at any given time, I don't think they'd hesitate to upgrade it. After all, it still sells like hotcakes.
     
    scannall and MajinCry like this.