Best value in 64-bit number crunching?

Zim

Golden Member
Dec 25, 2003
1,043
4
81
I need to put together a cheap-ish system for some heavy duty number crunching. Mostly floating point calcs done with a large (1.5GB) in-memory data set. I'm trying to decide on the best cpu for the buck. I guess I have about $250 to spend on a CPU and motherboard. Any suggestions? BTW I would be willing to overclock providing it was easy and stable.
 

ncage

Golden Member
Jan 14, 2001
1,608
0
71
ya and for number crunching i would probably get solaris x86 if not linux 64 bit
 

hurtstotalktoyou

Platinum Member
Mar 24, 2005
2,055
9
81
The Sempron 64 line is very overclocker-friendly, and amazingly cheap. You can get a Sempron 2500+ for $60 (retail) and overclock it to the level of an Athlon 3300+ or 3400+ on standard air. The Venice 3000+ for socket-939 is more expensive (and requires a more expensive motherboard, too), but it can get to about 2.7 GHz (4000+ish performance).

If you're not overclocking, the 3400+ for socket-754 seems to be the best bang for your buck.
 
Dec 17, 2004
56
0
0
If this number crunching is affected by dual channel memory, bigger L2 cache, and higher clockspeed, it might be worth it to get the cheapest venice and overclock it.
 

Zim

Golden Member
Dec 25, 2003
1,043
4
81
The floating point calcs on the Intel chips seem to be a lot faster than the AMD ones.
 

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
27,282
16,122
136
Originally posted by: Zim
The floating point calcs on the Intel chips seem to be a lot faster than the AMD ones.

Forget synthetic benches. What application are you talking about ? A real benchmark on an application is all I want to see.
 

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
27,282
16,122
136
Well, try it on your4400+. Sounds like it should smoke on that system.