Originally posted by: Gothgar
radeon 9550
edit: http://www.newegg.com/app/View...=14-121-511&depa=1
make sure you pick up a 128 bit model.
Originally posted by: Matthias99
A used Ti4600 is actually likely to be your best bet. No DX9, and horrible AA/AF performance, but it does DX8.1 without AA/AF about as fast or slightly faster than a 9600Pro (depending on the game).
Originally posted by: Nab
what's the difference between asus, rosewill, etc. Should I be looking at the brands like that?
Originally posted by: Nab
Originally posted by: Matthias99
A used Ti4600 is actually likely to be your best bet. No DX9, and horrible AA/AF performance, but it does DX8.1 without AA/AF about as fast or slightly faster than a 9600Pro (depending on the game).
I just searched Ti4600 on newegg but i didn't see anything under 80.
Originally posted by: Matthias99
Originally posted by: Nab
Originally posted by: Matthias99
A used Ti4600 is actually likely to be your best bet. No DX9, and horrible AA/AF performance, but it does DX8.1 without AA/AF about as fast or slightly faster than a 9600Pro (depending on the game).
I just searched Ti4600 on newegg but i didn't see anything under 80.
You won't be able to find them new anymore, at least not at reasonable prices. They're relatively 'old' at this point, but were the fastest DX8 cards produced. Try the For Sale/Trade forum here, or EBay. They can't run DX9 shaders, but are significantly faster than a RADEON 9600 or 9550 in terms of raw fillrate. They're more on par with a 9600Pro or 9600XT when running DX8 games (or DX9 games in DX8 mode) without AA and AF.
Try some searches in the Video forum if you're looking for more information (the sticked threads are a good place to start). This question gets asked weekly, if not more frequently.
Originally posted by: Gothgar
yes, and you can get a 9600 pro for used that price as well...
so, if he wants new, like I said before. 9550 for 79$, if he wants used, he can go with 9600pro...
as I recall, the 9500pro blew away the ti4600, and the 9550 is only a tad slower than the 9500 pro
Originally posted by: Gothgar
wow, that is some article you found there... pretty cool stuff
hell, I would still say go for the 9600pro used, as you get the dx9 support, the benchmarks might say that they are very close, but picture quality will be much better on the 9600pro in dx9 games, etc.
if he doesn't want used though, I still stand firm on the 9550, for a brand new card, you really would be hard pressed to beat it...
Originally posted by: formulav8
Just get a Radeon 9600 Non-Pro (or maybe even a 9550 since the clocks are 250mhz core instead of 325mhz core that the non-pro is). I had one and edited the bios and changed the clocks to 425 core(Would do 452mhz no probs, just didn't want to take a chance) and the memory to 500-512mhz. The core clock is above Pro speed, the memory clocks is below pro speeds.
I just changed to a 9600 Pro and I CANNOT tell any difference in performance between the 9600 Non-Pro I had with the overclocked core and memory and this Pro I have now.
So, you can easily get a Non-Pro to 90%-95% the performance of a 9600 Pro for ALOT less money. This is just my opinion and experiences 🙂
Jason