Best scifi effects of all time.

Malak

Lifer
Dec 4, 2004
14,696
2
0
I have to say I agree with many of these. Even though The Matrix came out more than 10 years ago, it still has some of the best visual effects ever used.
 

Spoooon

Lifer
Mar 3, 2000
11,563
203
106
I have to say I agree with many of these. Even though The Matrix came out more than 10 years ago, it still has some of the best visual effects ever used.

I watched it again the other day. The cellphones are the only things that really date the film.
 

TridenT

Lifer
Sep 4, 2006
16,800
45
91
I watched it again the other day. The cellphones are the only things that really date the film.

This, lol. Even at the time they showed the third film I was like, "That cellphone is kinda out of date..."
 

ShadowOfMyself

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2006
4,227
2
0
Terminator 2 is definitely one of the most impressive ones... Its hard to believe the movie is from 1992, it just blew away everything else in CG
 

gorcorps

aka Brandon
Jul 18, 2004
30,741
456
126
I agree with the vast majority of this, but there were two in my mind that looked pretty off to me when I saw them:

Balrog in LOTR. Maybe I'm just being picky, but I never found him to be impressive at all. I found golumn to be a much more impressive feat given how much you see him and how quickly you forget he's all digital.

Two Face in The Dark Knight. I would have preferred some well done make-up to this digital stuff. Maybe it wasn't so much the effect as it was the acting that took away from the effect. Try and talk with half your lips/mouth missing, either by trying to keep them open or holding them open. You sound noticeably different (at least I do) but in the movie he talks like nothings missing... possibly because they didn't do anything to his mouth and it was all digital. I may be wrong and he just got comfortable enough to talk well, but I don't think that's it.

Both nit-picky I know, just something I wanted to mention.
 
Sep 29, 2004
18,656
68
91
Terminator 2 is definitely one of the most impressive ones... Its hard to believe the movie is from 1992, it just blew away everything else in CG

I might be biased seeing that I was about 14 or 15 when I saw this movie. My brother took me and it was awesome. The effects for it's day were groundbreaking. Yes, I will go that far.
 

HamburgerBoy

Lifer
Apr 12, 2004
27,111
318
126
The half-alien thing in Alien: Resurrection turning into vacuum-prepared spaghetti at the end.
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Everyone forgot Titanic and how they took state of the art special effects and used them to create something that hasn't existed in 80+ years.

There was really only one scene in the whole movie that was noticeably fake (the people walking on the deck during a fly by scene didn't look real due to the way they walked)
 

Malak

Lifer
Dec 4, 2004
14,696
2
0
Repo men had some good effects too. There was a scene with a dude that had a fake cybernetic arm that I didn't even notice till I was watching the special features on it. Also Surrogates.
 

gorcorps

aka Brandon
Jul 18, 2004
30,741
456
126
Repo men had some good effects too. There was a scene with a dude that had a fake cybernetic arm that I didn't even notice till I was watching the special features on it. Also Surrogates.

Too bad the movie sucked ass huh?
 

gorcorps

aka Brandon
Jul 18, 2004
30,741
456
126
They didn't suck. They weren't amazing, but there are much worse movies.

I didn't mean both, I mainly meant Repo Men. About halfway through it made a horrible turn and never looked back. It could have been great.
 

blinblue

Senior member
Jul 7, 2006
889
0
76
Balrog in LOTR. Maybe I'm just being picky, but I never found him to be impressive at all. I found golumn to be a much more impressive feat given how much you see him and how quickly you forget he's all digital.

I think the big thing about the Balrog was the realistic fire. I may be mistaken but I think it was the first actually good looking CG fire that didn't look obviously fake.
 

Triumph

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,031
14
81
T2 deserves to be at the top of this list (even though it is in no particular order). T2 was about stunning special affects, tastefully done. They improved the story, rather than having the story centered around them. Are you listening Lucas? Hell, are you listening Cameron? You did it right in T2, but you forgot this notion in Avatar: you took a rehashed storyline and put it in a CGI world, proclaiming that your 3D affects would change cinema. So the plot was really only secondary to the effects.
 
Last edited:

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,082
136
I think the big thing about the Balrog was the realistic fire. I may be mistaken but I think it was the first actually good looking CG fire that didn't look obviously fake.

I remember that too. I was thinking to myself " what, did they tape real fire and overlay it on the 3D model?"
Watched the special features disc and apparently it was all generated from scratch. Fucking awesome.

Wonder what it looks like on Blu-ray.
:hmm:
 

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,684
5,228
136
For being done in 1968, the effects in 2001: A Space Odyssey were just incredible.