ultimatebob
Lifer
Originally posted by: Boonesmi
i also was going to suggest a kyro2
i used one for a long time and loved it, as fast as a non-MX geforce 2
I thought that the Kryo 2 had lousy Linux drivers. Are they any better now?
Originally posted by: Boonesmi
i also was going to suggest a kyro2
i used one for a long time and loved it, as fast as a non-MX geforce 2
Originally posted by: bluemax
I really would have gone for a little more "oomph". For a measely $30 or so, the Radeon 8500LE or 9000 (even from a 3rd party like Sapphire) would provide a LOT more horsepower for the future, and provide better 2D & DVD right away. I'm not saying you made a BAD choice, but you'll feel the itch to upgrade an awful lot sooner with a GTS-V.
Good thing it's not your main machine... maybe it won't be a big deal for you. 🙂
Originally posted by: mithrandir2001
I don't know what to think about nVidia's poor 2D reputation. My GTS-V is tack sharp at 1280x960, which is what I run on my 17" monitor. However, I run my office PC at 1600x1200 and the integrated Intel video chip just wasn't up to task; an add-on Matrox Millenium II did the trick.
AmenOriginally posted by: Sunner
Well, as mentioned above, the GTS-V's are all made by Visiontek, and Visiontek has a reputation for being one of the best brand when it comes to 2D quality.Originally posted by: mithrandir2001
I don't know what to think about nVidia's poor 2D reputation. My GTS-V is tack sharp at 1280x960, which is what I run on my 17" monitor. However, I run my office PC at 1600x1200 and the integrated Intel video chip just wasn't up to task; an add-on Matrox Millenium II did the trick.
And Visiontek is going out of business.Originally posted by: ynotravid
AmenOriginally posted by: Sunner
Well, as mentioned above, the GTS-V's are all made by Visiontek, and Visiontek has a reputation for being one of the best brand when it comes to 2D quality.Originally posted by: mithrandir2001
I don't know what to think about nVidia's poor 2D reputation. My GTS-V is tack sharp at 1280x960, which is what I run on my 17" monitor. However, I run my office PC at 1600x1200 and the integrated Intel video chip just wasn't up to task; an add-on Matrox Millenium II did the trick.
3dfx is already out of business and they made quality cards. 🙂Originally posted by: mithrandir2001
And Visiontek is going out of business.Originally posted by: ynotravid
AmenOriginally posted by: Sunner
Well, as mentioned above, the GTS-V's are all made by Visiontek, and Visiontek has a reputation for being one of the best brand when it comes to 2D quality.Originally posted by: mithrandir2001
I don't know what to think about nVidia's poor 2D reputation. My GTS-V is tack sharp at 1280x960, which is what I run on my 17" monitor. However, I run my office PC at 1600x1200 and the integrated Intel video chip just wasn't up to task; an add-on Matrox Millenium II did the trick.
I'm not having very good luck. My current card is a Visiontek, the previous two were 3dfx's, the one before that was a Number Nine and the one before that (my very first) was a Diamond.Originally posted by: ynotravid
3dfx is already out of business and they made quality cards. 🙂Originally posted by: mithrandir2001
And Visiontek is going out of business.Originally posted by: ynotravid
AmenOriginally posted by: Sunner
Well, as mentioned above, the GTS-V's are all made by Visiontek, and Visiontek has a reputation for being one of the best brand when it comes to 2D quality.Originally posted by: mithrandir2001
I don't know what to think about nVidia's poor 2D reputation. My GTS-V is tack sharp at 1280x960, which is what I run on my 17" monitor. However, I run my office PC at 1600x1200 and the integrated Intel video chip just wasn't up to task; an add-on Matrox Millenium II did the trick.