Originally posted by: thedarkwolf
Originally posted by: lifeguard1999
I would say that the Hauppauge PVR-250 is better than the Leadtek TV2000 Expert, but is it 3.5 times better? After all, you would be paying $174 for the PVR-250, and $48 for the TV2000.
The pvr-350 with hardware encoder and decoder is $175. The 250 is $140. If you want higher quallity recordings it probably is worth it plus the 250 is supported in just about every HTPC program there is including linux ones.
Just FYI, the PVR-350 has a rather stupid design oddity - the hardware
decoder only works when the card's TV out is enabled. Otherwise, it uses software to decode. There is supposedly a tweak to bypass the coders completely, from
this page:
Enable Live Preview , bypass encoder for 0 delay and fast channel change
This will bypass the decoder and result in a 0 sec image delay as well as faster chanel change. Very useful if you plan to hook up your gameconsole.
Note : Live preview won?t work with all driver version, most of the 1,7 version work and some of the 1,6 just. There are to many drivers to list every driver here, so just test it and see if it works.
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Hauppauge\hcwTVWnd]
"LivePreview"=dword:00000001 (1 for on, 0 for off)
I can tell you though, hardware encoding is definitely a good thing - you can encode at high quality, full-resolution MPEG2, and still be able to use the computer. The decoding is what hits the CPU the most, since it isn't done in the hardware. No idea why they chose to mess up the card like that.

I had also used the 250 and 350's predecessor, the PVR-PCI, which is no longer supported by Hauppauge. It featured the Livepreview thing as a standard feature - it only displayed an MPEG stream when it was timeshifting. Otherwise, it was a direct TV stream. The x50's always display an MPEG stream. With the PVR-PCI, recording full-res MPEG2 would only result in around 5% CPU utilization on an XP1700 (Palomino) CPU. That's how much of a load it can take off of the processor.