Hmm I dont know what you guys are talking about-just built a system with an abit se6 and it is as good as any if not better-I work with asus boards all day (thousands of them at my current work) and if you want to talk about QC issues then talk to some of the other NASA hq techs they will all say asus is the bottom of the barrel, we have nothing but problems with their motherboards
just goes to show you no company is perfect-I have yet to have a problem with abit, although I work with them on a much smaller scale than the asus boards we deal with. I wouln't have any qualms recommending the se6 to anyone I know, and my other friend who is a tech also at nasa and has built over 300 systems on his spare time alone also just built an se6 system and said it was one of the best and easiest boards he worked with.
abit caters to a more specialized crowd, which is why they would never be considered for an oem system. If anything a retailer wants a board that the end user cannot update or modify. How do you think they make their money? by selling a system that can be easily updated and worked on by the end user? no way.
Most end user/oem systems come with either really no name boards so that the user cannot find updates and have to go to their reseller for service, or they are proprietary(sp?) and have no updates, or standard intel components are used. We are currently working on phasing out the ASUS based systems now with either standard intel bx boards or we are swapping the whole machine out for compaq midtower systms at work.
Abit in my opinion makes a fine product now, when the bh6 was around and a few boards after that they were kind of crappy with alot of problems, but I think the company has comae along way in the past two years-their manuals are top notch, their cs is getting better, and in my case (about 6 systems based on abit boards, with the exception of my bh6) I have yet to have incident on any. They are the easiest to configure out of what I have worked with.