Best PCI-e powered card

bmadd89

Member
Sep 22, 2010
73
0
66
Currently running an i7-2600k in a HP 8200. I have F@H running on it 24x7 on 7 threads and I’m curious if I add a GT 440 or something of the like would it be advantageous to my ppd or would it cost me points. Since the system is a HP I am limited to the bus power of the pci-e slot. Are there any recommendations or am I out of luck?

Thanks
 

biodoc

Diamond Member
Dec 29, 2005
6,261
2,238
136
Since you're only using 7 of your 8 "cores" for F@H cpu processing (smp client, right?), you shouldn't see a drop in ppd for your smp client by adding a F@H gpu client.
 

blckgrffn

Diamond Member
May 1, 2003
9,123
3,058
136
www.teamjuchems.com
Is the SMP client really using seven threads? And to back up biodoc, no, you won't see a drop! :) You'd likely gain ~6k ppd.

Which is what? Nearly 2M over the course of year, certainly nothing to sneeze at.
 

Ken g6

Programming Moderator, Elite Member
Moderator
Dec 11, 1999
16,244
3,833
75
I'm just wondering which would be faster: a GT440 or a Radeon 7750?
 

bmadd89

Member
Sep 22, 2010
73
0
66
I'm running the V7 client and just change it to run on 7 threads instead of auto (it is a work machine after all so i do need a core to surf the web and do other stuff)

20f24rb.png


What i would do is drop the smp down to 6 threads and use 1 thread for the GPU so i still had 1 thread for actual work. I would be sacrificing an smp thread for a gpu. Is that still a better option?

@Ken g6: The 440 would be as the ATI cards are not as good as the Nvidia for F@H
 

Ken g6

Programming Moderator, Elite Member
Moderator
Dec 11, 1999
16,244
3,833
75
Those are hyper-threads, so you're only losing virtual cores. I notice the text says the value should be a multiple of two anyway.

I still wonder about the 7750 because although it's AMD, it's much faster intrinsically than a 440. I wonder how that balances out?
 

blckgrffn

Diamond Member
May 1, 2003
9,123
3,058
136
www.teamjuchems.com
Those are hyper-threads, so you're only losing virtual cores. I notice the text says the value should be a multiple of two anyway.

I still wonder about the 7750 because although it's AMD, it's much faster intrinsically than a 440. I wonder how that balances out?

There just aren't the WU's available on the AMD side for consistent work. If you have CUDA, you'll get a constant stream of non-beta, actually-useful-to-science work to do.
 

theAnimal

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2003
3,828
23
76
Nvidia cards use very little CPU for folding (should be less than 2%), ATI cards considerably more unless that has changed (haven't folded ATI for a while now).
 

blckgrffn

Diamond Member
May 1, 2003
9,123
3,058
136
www.teamjuchems.com
Nvidia cards use very little CPU for folding (should be less than 2%), ATI cards considerably more unless that has changed (haven't folded ATI for a while now).

Nope, the OpenCL WU's still eat a lot of CPU, that is true across all the DC projects where I have been able to utilize OpenCL... except MW@H. That one seemed to play nice without a ~core per WU.


Very good. So is the GT440 the best bus powered card i can buy to use for folding?

Survey says.... YES! :) I'd spend the coin to get one with a good fan since you be forced to listen to it all the time otherwise.