I can't decide whether a 2.4C, 2.6C, or 2.8C have any different overclocking potentials, over than just being at different stock speeds. I guess the same goes for all Athlon XP chips. Really though, I'm not sure if I can justify the $70 difference between a 2500+ at 3200+ against like a 2.6C at 3.4...I'll mostly be using it for games, but also some things like Photoshop and Dreamweaver. I know AMD chips typically do more per cycle, but is there enough extra raw power in an overclocked P4C to beat an overclocked 2500+?