I would change the CPU, it's going to be severely limiting even a mid-range card at 1080p in most games. 280x/770 class card is already an overkill for such a CPU but go a tier lower and you will get a helluva slower cards so they are a sensible choice unless you can find older cards like GTX680 or 7950 boost for noticeably less, there's no sense in saving 20-30$ but if you can find GTX680 for 100$ less than 770 then it's worth it. I know you said the price was not an issue but if that's the case then why keep that ancient CPU?
OK. Thanks to all your suggestions, I think I will look at the GTX 760, R9-270, or HD 7950 (if still on sale). I'd rather have a little too much card for the CPU than not enough.
How does the new R7-265 rate?
As others said, make your priority on the CPU first if you have the cash, some 760G motherboards accept FX CPU's, my FX 4350 is a pretty nice CPU so see if that motherboard's BIOS accepts it.
Unfortunately, the MSI 785GM-E65 board I have only has an AM3 socket. So, a CPU upgrade is out of the question.
For that CPU I'd say a max of GTX 760. Anything beyond that is going to be limited by the CPU.
The GTX 760 is very good though and should provide great gaming for the next 2 years easily.
Why do you figure the 7950 is better than the 760? They seem to trade punches in the benchmarks depending on the game.
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/854?vs=855
http://gpuboss.com/gpus/Radeon-HD-7950-vs-GeForce-GTX-760
And Newegg has both of those cards for $229.
Why do you figure the 7950 is better than the 760?
And Newegg has both of those cards for $229.
Attic said:The 7950 from newegg will run at 925 core (+125 from anand bench) and the 7950 really opens up when getting the core to 1000 and most guys on these cards were successful to 1100.
What Attic said.
Sapphire 7950 dual fan = $230, $210 AR.
The cheapest GTX 760 on newegg is indeed $230 ($210 AR), but it is a blower cooler type from PNY with only 1 year warranty. For a model comparable to the Sapphire - proper cooling and at least 2 year warranty - you'd have to pay $250 ($240 AR) for a Gigabyte.
The GTX 760 does come with free Watch Dogs while the Sapphire 7950 is not bundled with games, however. So if you include the cost of the game, then the GTX 760 will be cheaper.
Yep. I've been running my Sapphire 7950 Vapor-X at 1100MHz for over a year, and recently it started acting up a bit (artifacts in some games, drivers crashing) so I clocked down to 1050Mhz, as I didn't want to overvolt it more. However, there's no guarantee that the Dual-X on newegg will handle 1100Mhz, but whatever the overclock, it will still be a fair bit faster than the GTX 760.
@ lehtv and Attic:
Very good information. Much appreciated. I see what you mean about the HD 7950 after digesting all this. I will have to reconsider it after all. Now I owe you an explanation of why I said "assume I don't overclock". Actually, I do...
My processor isn't really a PhII X4 980BE. It started out life as a Phenom II X2 B59. I was able to unlock the 2 dormant cores to make it a stable 559 quad core. I now have it at a stable 3.74 GHZ, so I just used the 980BE to keep things simple since it now has the same specs. I think I might be at the fastest I can run it, so that is why I said I don't OC. Sorry, I should have said that originally.
Nice, and I get why you'd just call the proc what it most closely represents.
I previously owned four of the 7950 MSI TFIII cards and had good experience like lehtv, they all ran over 1100+mhz on the core. Only complaint on them was the twin 80mm fans were smaller than I thought they should have been and the card got a bit noisy and ran a bit hot when pushed. But I had two in my Lian Li HTPC case so it was not ideal for xfire.
Watch Dogs bundle with the GTX 760 is a very nice addition, pretty much will be a must play game IMO.
Looking at the 7950's, it's a bit unfortunate AMD didn't do the R9 280 rebrand on the 7950 (yet?) if only because a game bundle could get with the R9 280.