Best GPS smart watch/fitness band?

highlanderfil

Golden Member
Jul 11, 2002
1,566
2
81
The Apple Watch would have been perfect for me with one small exception: it lacks a GPS feature which I would like my new wearable to have. So, intent though I was on taking the plunge, I'm stuck looking for a different solution. Here are the requirements:

- The aforementioned GPS (for run tracking/Facebook posting - yes, it's shameless self-promotion, but I find it motivating)
- iOS app
- Heart rate monitor of at least moderate accuracy
- Calorie counter (preferably related to HRM) - in the watch or app, I don't really care which
- Battery life of at least a full day

Optional features:

- MP3 player (for Bluetooth headphones)
- Safe for swimming

Not super fussed about aesthetics. Would like to keep it under $300, but would consider stretching the budget if absolutely needed.

TIA :)
 

drbrock

Golden Member
Feb 8, 2008
1,333
8
81
Fenix 2 off ebay includes the heart rate monitor. Amazing watch and can do everything but have an MP3 player. Battery life is also excellent. Fenix 3 is crazy expensive and you don't get that much more for the money. However it did drive the prices of the Fenix 2 substantially. It probably has to do with the color screen.

I am personally waiting for the apple watch 2 or 3 for me to upgrade. GPS and bettery life are crucial which the iwatch does not have.
 

highlanderfil

Golden Member
Jul 11, 2002
1,566
2
81
I'd be happy to hold off for now if I knew that the AW2 would have GPS, but all the rumors I've read so far suggested that it won't...
 

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
The iOS for the Fitbit products is great. The Fitbit Surge seems to fit all your requirements. I have a Charge HR that I really like.
 

highlanderfil

Golden Member
Jul 11, 2002
1,566
2
81
The iOS for the Fitbit products is great. The Fitbit Surge seems to fit all your requirements. I have a Charge HR that I really like.
Yeah, the Fitbit iOS app is pretty stellar, although it doesn't do a great job of tracking exercise such as weightlifting, but, in fairness, that wasn't part of my original requirements:). What does concern me is FitBit's wearables' quality (I had a Flex that bruised my wrist and ended up getting a One instead).
 
Last edited:

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
Yeah, the Fitbit iOS app is pretty stellar, although it doesn't do a great job of tracking exercise such as weightlifting, but, in fairness, that wasn't part of my original requirements:). What does concern me is FitBit's wearables' quality (I had a Flex that bruised my wrist and ended up getting a One instead).

The newer heart rate based models (Charge HR & Surge) do a much better job of estimating caloric burn. I just got my Charge a couple months ago, but in one month I used it to cut from 173 to 157lbs, and now I'm using it to slow bulk to 200lbs. It has me on a 400 a day calorie surplus, and it's been successful so far (though there have been some late nights with a jar of peanut butter trying to meet my goals.) Results are being tracked with their Aria scale, which also syncs with the app.
 

highlanderfil

Golden Member
Jul 11, 2002
1,566
2
81
The newer heart rate based models (Charge HR & Surge) do a much better job of estimating caloric burn. I just got my Charge a couple months ago, but in one month I used it to cut from 173 to 157lbs, and now I'm using it to slow bulk to 200lbs. It has me on a 400 a day calorie surplus, and it's been successful so far (though there have been some late nights with a jar of peanut butter trying to meet my goals.) Results are being tracked with their Aria scale, which also syncs with the app.
That's good. I have the Aria scale, just need to get more serious about using it. Guess I'm going to try to find a good deal on Surge, then:).