• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Best Gaming Router for Under $275?

Piano Man

Diamond Member
Well, I move into my new house in about 3 weeks, and my roomates all have computers. We all play online games such as Q3, Tribes, UT, and Battle.net together. So my question is this. What is the best router that will let us all play (4 of us) on the same server without it getting funky on us?🙂 I've heard that the Linksys Etherfast has major problems with this, so I am worried about making the wrong buying decision. Our connection to the internet is via a cable modem. A switch based router is preferred, but I'll take a hub if it is the only router that can accomplish the goal mentioned above. Thanks.
 
Can you use a cheap 4 port hub with your cable ISP? At my friend's place he just has the cable modem hooked up to the hub and then each of three computers runs off the hub. The Cable ISP lets us have up to 4 PCs for each cable modem. Everything works fine with threee people playing online and it was only like $35 for the hub.
 
Just find a really old computer(Pentium or PPro) and set up Linux on it as a router, and hook it up to your network. You'll want to get a 5 port hub so it can exist with all of your roommate's comps.
 
Id say the Linksys ethernet cable/dsl router it owns! it gives each pc an automatic ip when there hooked to the network and enables internet/lan sharing and comes with a 4 port hub it costs about $199! Personally I've had no problems with it and it works great!
 
The cheapest way is to put a nat program on a PC (doesn't have to be old, I use the PC with nat32 on it). I hated that Linksys when I used it. Some games have issues with the same ip logging in multiple times to the same server, and there is no way around that without purchasing extra ips. UT and Q3 should be fine, dunno about the others.
 
I think there is a lot of misinformation going on in this thread. First of all, because I don't think you are explaining what you need correctly using the right terminology.

We need to know how your cable modem connects to your network. Is it a card that plugs into one of your machines or is it a stand alone device with an ethernet RJ45 10bT jack?

Is the cable modem itself a router? Do you have multiple IPs assigned by your ISP? Basically, how did your ISP want you to hook it up? That should tell us what kind of device it is.

In the International Standards Organization's Open Systems Interconnection model (ISO's OSI model) there are 7 layers. These are Physical, Data Link, Network, Transport, Session, Presentation, and Application. The Physical layer basically is the encoding of the bits onto the line. The Data Link layer controls node-to-node delivery with out errors on the same subnet of a single data unit. The network layer controls end-to-end delivery between subnets of a single packet. The Transport Lyaer is responsible for end-to-end delivery of the entire message. The session layer controls establishing, synchronizing, and closing of a session. The persentation layer is the API between the software and the hardware. The Application layer is the software.

The levels of devices are repeaters/hubs, switches, routers, and gateways. Repeaters and hubs deal with layer 1. Switches deal with layers 1 and 2. Routers deal with layers 1-3. Gateways deal with layers 1-7. This is somewhat simplified, there are some "smart switches" that look into layer 3. However, overall this is pretty accurate.

Now you probably need a hub or a switch to connect all your machines together. Then depending whether the cable modem itself is a router you may need a router between the cable modem and your internal network.

If you only have one IP address assigned by your ISP you will need to do network address translation (NAT) and use one of the reserved blocks of IPs.

Then one also needs to consider whether you care about people breaking into your home network and whether you want to set up a firewall or not. For reference packet-filtering is just an activity of a router. Stateful packet filtering (SPF) or proxying is an activity of a gateway. Some people call simple packet filters firewalls, they really aren't. I only consider something a firewall if its a gateway.

For example here is how my connection to the net works:

ISP backbone router
|
Redback
|
switch
|
DSLAM
|
DSL modem (set to transparent/bridging mode)
|
firewall
|
switch x hub -
||||||| |||
C1||||| C6||
C2|||| C7|
C3||| P2
C4||
C5|
P1

Between the switch and the hub it uses a crossover port.

The reason you are getting so many different answers is because people don't know whether you need a hub/switch or router. My guess is you probably need both.

I use a Netgear FS108 switch and a Netgear EN104 (If someone comes over with 10b2 we can do that too.)

Linux boxen make great routers and firewalls. I have the internal interface on my firewall IP aliased to the 10.x reserved subnet and my real subnet since I have 8 real IPs. The 10.x is DHCP so someone can just come over plug in there machine assign it to "Obtain an IP address automatically" and it configures everything for them.

If your DSL modem is a card in one of your machines, just put in a network card to hook it up to a switch and your other machines and install some software to do firewalling/routing and NAT if necessary.

If you need a router and don't want to set-up a computer to do it, Netopia makes decent cheap routers. Cisco makes the best, but they are way out of your price range. The Netgear RT311 $119 looks like an affordable solution, but I don't know anything about it. http://www.netgear.com/products/rt311ds.shtml. I have been happy with all the Netgear hubs and switches I've used, but routers are a whole other category. I have no idea about the security of the "firewall" included. It's probably a packet filter with a few little stateful add-ons for FTP and such. I wouldn't count on it being really secure but it probably would keep out the script kiddies if configured correctly. Asante usually makes dirt cheap products, but they are crap. Stay away from Cabletron too. 3com makes good NICs and decent hubs, stay away from anything higher end then that made by them. Ascend made half decent stuff but Lucent bought them. Their firewall add-on was expensive and had some known security holes in it last time I worked with it (about 2 years ago.) No idea what their current line is.

Hope I haven't lost you completely and provided some useful info.
 
Hardware central did a review of the Netgear RT311:

http://www.hardwarecentral.com/hardwarecentral/reviews/1748/2/

The price they quote ($200) is much higher then I can find:

$113, $116
http://www.pricegrabber.com/search_gen.php?catzero=&firstsearch=1&form_keyword=Netgear%20RT311&topcat_id=1

$119
http://queen.pricewatch.com/search/search.idq?ne=22506&l=22460&qc=%22NETGEAR%22*+AND+%22RT311%22*&CiCodePage=Windows-1252&cr=Netgear+RT311

$119
http://www.ibuyer.net/prod.html?id=390418

The Linksys's "firewall" is the NAT. That is false advertising in my opinion. Just using NAT is not a firewall. There are quite a number of attacks it does not protect against. (For example inserting partial response packets.)

The Linksys 1-port I've seen for as low as $94 though. They have a 4-port that runs around $150. That gives you no expandibility though.
Although the Linksys 4-port will run you around $150. A Netgear RT311 and a FS108 will run you about $240 and you would have 3 free ports. That's a big difference in price. One gets packet filtering with the Netgear. I have heard complaints about the Linksys, I don't know anyone who has the Netgear.
 
Well, I'll make this short. I'm using the Netgear RT311, running only CS at the moment, later I'll be running UT on another system. Great router.
 
Back
Top