• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Best cpu for UT3?

btcomm1

Senior member
I've looked at benchmarks, so far it seems a quad core will be better because it has more cache on it.

I've been thinking about getting the Q6600 G0 stepping.


Is there anything better for the money that is coming out now or before christmas?
 
Q6600 G0...any of the newer conroe chips (e6550, e6750, e6850). you cant go wrong with them.

if you wanted to wait for 45nm chips, you could buy a cheap cpu (celeron/pentium c2d based), then sell it and upgrade to the 45nm...
 
Originally posted by: secretanchitman
Q6600 G0...any of the newer conroe chips (e6550, e6750, e6850). you cant go wrong with them.

if you wanted to wait for 45nm chips, you could buy a cheap cpu (celeron/pentium c2d based), then sell it and upgrade to the 45nm...


I'm not sure I know what you mean, when you say q6600 G0...

Do you mean that one would be good as well as the newer conroe chips?



 
Q6600 is the processor, the "G0" is the stepping. You had it in your original post. What I am doing is waiting until the mainstream Penryn-based quad-core processors are released in January/February. For $316, you can get the Q9450 which runs at 2.66Ghz per core with a 12MB L2 cache. Looking at preliminary overclock results, you could push one of these to 4.0Ghz no problem.
 
Right now, Q6600 or Xeon X3210/X3220.

UT3 does indeed take advantage of quads...with duals, usually CPU usage is completely maxed @ 100%
With quads, it's a more balanced load.
 
Originally posted by: jbzx86
Q6600 is the processor, the "G0" is the stepping. You had it in your original post. What I am doing is waiting until the mainstream Penryn-based quad-core processors are released in January/February. For $316, you can get the Q9450 which runs at 2.66Ghz per core with a 12MB L2 cache. Looking at preliminary overclock results, you could push one of these to 4.0Ghz no problem.

what board exactly would do 500 mhz fsb with "no problem"??

no overclocker looking for a good price/performance cpu would even consider any of intel's initial core 2 quad 45nm line up
 
I think I've decided I will not go with SLI, is 500 mhz higher then any other board will go?

If so I think I will get the abit ip35.

How does the 500mhz compare with a fsb of 1333 mhz? Is it higher or is it the same?

500mhz on what hehe, I'm a newb at all the new specs of motherboards.
 
Did not know that, thanks! Though I would have thought that getting a quad that will do 500mhz in the first place would be the problem, with air/water.
 
Originally posted by: btcomm1
I've looked at benchmarks, so far it seems a quad core will be better because it has more cache on it.

I've been thinking about getting the Q6600 G0 stepping.


Is there anything better for the money that is coming out now or before christmas?

Unreal Tournament 3 CPU Benchmarks

I myself is in this same situation. After I posted a poll in my thread, and careful consideration, I am finally going to make the jump to Intel and the Q6600.
 
Back
Top