Originally posted by: Alistar7
Be interesting to see if they can get a jury conviction on the stepfather.
Originally posted by: Jhill
That is the funniest, most fucked up,weirdest thing I've read in awhile.
Originally posted by: amdforever2
They both deserve jail.
The stepfather and mom should get divorced too.
He clearly has no love for her son, and orders his "woman" not to bond her son out of jail. She clearly has no love for the daughter or she wouldn't have bonded the son out in the first place. Maybe she doesn't think he's guilty?
If the son isn't guilty then I really hope the stepfather gets a good punishment.
Originally posted by: Jhill
That is the funniest, most fucked up,weirdest thing I've read in awhile.
Originally posted by: amdforever2
They both deserve jail.
The stepfather and mom should get divorced too.
He clearly has no love for her son, and orders his "woman" not to bond her son out of jail. She clearly has no love for the daughter or she wouldn't have bonded the son out in the first place. Maybe she doesn't think he's guilty?
If the son isn't guilty then I really hope the stepfather gets a good punishment.
She clearly has no love for the daughter or she wouldn't have bonded the son out in the first place. Maybe she doesn't think he's guilty?
Originally posted by: amdforever2
They both deserve jail.
The stepfather and mom should get divorced too.
He clearly has no love for her son, and orders his "woman" not to bond her son out of jail. She clearly has no love for the daughter or she wouldn't have bonded the son out in the first place. Maybe she doesn't think he's guilty?
If the son isn't guilty then I really hope the stepfather gets a good punishment.
Originally posted by: mooglemania85
Originally posted by: amdforever2
They both deserve jail.
The stepfather and mom should get divorced too.
He clearly has no love for her son, and orders his "woman" not to bond her son out of jail. She clearly has no love for the daughter or she wouldn't have bonded the son out in the first place. Maybe she doesn't think he's guilty?
If the son isn't guilty then I really hope the stepfather gets a good punishment.
Why the hell phrase it that way? Makes it sound like the stepfather is a control freak who acts like as just lord and master over his wife. Son should have stayed in the slammer.
Agree with
She clearly has no love for the daughter or she wouldn't have bonded the son out in the first place. Maybe she doesn't think he's guilty?
this part though.
PICS?Originally posted by: Jhill
This is probably the only thread in history where no one will ask for pics.
Originally posted by: amdforever2
Originally posted by: mooglemania85
Originally posted by: amdforever2
They both deserve jail.
The stepfather and mom should get divorced too.
He clearly has no love for her son, and orders his "woman" not to bond her son out of jail. She clearly has no love for the daughter or she wouldn't have bonded the son out in the first place. Maybe she doesn't think he's guilty?
If the son isn't guilty then I really hope the stepfather gets a good punishment.
Why the hell phrase it that way? Makes it sound like the stepfather is a control freak who acts like as just lord and master over his wife. Son should have stayed in the slammer.
Agree with
She clearly has no love for the daughter or she wouldn't have bonded the son out in the first place. Maybe she doesn't think he's guilty?
this part though.
Control Freak?
NO WAI
Clearly this guy has all his mental faculties in tact.
Considering that, not in a flash of rage, he planned and executed the assault of someone with metal pipe up this ass.
The article even says he warned her not to bond him.
Warnings imply a threat, threats imply control.
Originally posted by: UglyCasanova
Originally posted by: amdforever2
Originally posted by: mooglemania85
Originally posted by: amdforever2
They both deserve jail.
The stepfather and mom should get divorced too.
He clearly has no love for her son, and orders his "woman" not to bond her son out of jail. She clearly has no love for the daughter or she wouldn't have bonded the son out in the first place. Maybe she doesn't think he's guilty?
If the son isn't guilty then I really hope the stepfather gets a good punishment.
Why the hell phrase it that way? Makes it sound like the stepfather is a control freak who acts like as just lord and master over his wife. Son should have stayed in the slammer.
Agree with
She clearly has no love for the daughter or she wouldn't have bonded the son out in the first place. Maybe she doesn't think he's guilty?
this part though.
Control Freak?
NO WAI
Clearly this guy has all his mental faculties in tact.
Considering that, not in a flash of rage, he planned and executed the assault of someone with metal pipe up this ass.
The article even says he warned her not to bond him.
Warnings imply a threat, threats imply control.
I'm sure the stepdad warned her not to bond him out from fear of what he may do to the stepson. For his safety leave him in there. I have a 7 year old daughter and if I were in his situation there is no telling what I would do.
Originally posted by: Bumrush99
Originally posted by: Alistar7
Be interesting to see if they can get a jury conviction on the stepfather.
If the stick don't fit you must acquit!!!!
Originally posted by: amdforever2
In the heat of the moment is one thing, like if we walked in on it happening, premeditation is another thing entirely and proves he's got issues.
Even if it were your daughter, with time to think about the matter, you should be able to say to yourself I don't want to miss her growing up so I won't do anything stupid.