Best Buy asserts the Small Claims Court is respectfully not the proper forum to hear this case. This case is more complicated than it appears on its face and the defendants are entitled to legal representation to defend this matter. The plaintiff appears to be making a breach of contract claim against the defendant for damages allegedly incurred as the result of the pricing error on defendant?s website; however, the true nature and extent of the plaintiff?s claims against defendant are unknown. Breach of contract theories are varied and complicated in nature. If forced to proceed, defendant will be at a double disadvantage due to the fact that it does not have an adequate representative in the State of Washington to testify to these matters, and due to the fact that defendant should be entitled to legal representation when having to defend the contract claims asserted by the plaintiff. The defendant is entitled to litigate the issues presented and raise certain legal defenses that they will be unable to do in Small Claims Court because they cannot be represented by an attorney.