- Jun 30, 2004
- 16,386
- 1,913
- 126
I have to decide among the possibilities for an AiO cooler, preferring that it be "custom-izable" for expansion or replacement. None of the prices for AiO coolers I've seen are prohibitive; some could seem a better bargain than others. I can't sacrifice reliability for performance, but I want performance near the top of the heap in some very inclusive comparison review, some often linked in to Frosty Tech's web-site.
The H240 X2 and even the H220 X2 have poor customer reviews, and the tally of all reviews shows a lack of popularity. But the units have a copper-brass radiator, there's a fill-port, and one could think a user would go through some sample of tribulations that builders of custom watercooled rigs experience as routine in the process of getting things to work. I don't know. Someone could comment about my guess.
The Corsair Hydro H115i has more reviews, or about 74 of them at the Egg and considerably more than the others. It has 89% favorable reviews of 4 and 5*'s.
It has an aluminum radiator.
Then there's the EKWB Predator 240. Like the H240 X and X2, it was also built for expandability, but I heard there was either a recall or a defect EK would only have chosen to address. But what's the latest on these?
The chosen cooler must fit in the drive-cage of a Stacker 830, or optionally within a Corsair Vengeance C70. While the H115i is a compatible option in Corsair's list, it does not preclude using one or more of the others. As for the Stacker, it allows for a 140mm square fan inside the cage with 1/8" or so clearance on each side. At maximum, the length of the assembly shouldn't exceed 300mm if I need to use two 5.25" drive-bays for external access -- hot-swap, switches, USB3 ports, optical drives or LED panels.
Customer reviews always reflect a larger percentage of negatives if consumers have more reason to complain. A QC sample may show a smaller percentage. However, complaints of a similar nature would either forwarn of impossible problems, or indicate procedures for correcting those problems before fully deploying the cooler.
The H240 X2 and even the H220 X2 have poor customer reviews, and the tally of all reviews shows a lack of popularity. But the units have a copper-brass radiator, there's a fill-port, and one could think a user would go through some sample of tribulations that builders of custom watercooled rigs experience as routine in the process of getting things to work. I don't know. Someone could comment about my guess.
The Corsair Hydro H115i has more reviews, or about 74 of them at the Egg and considerably more than the others. It has 89% favorable reviews of 4 and 5*'s.
It has an aluminum radiator.
Then there's the EKWB Predator 240. Like the H240 X and X2, it was also built for expandability, but I heard there was either a recall or a defect EK would only have chosen to address. But what's the latest on these?
The chosen cooler must fit in the drive-cage of a Stacker 830, or optionally within a Corsair Vengeance C70. While the H115i is a compatible option in Corsair's list, it does not preclude using one or more of the others. As for the Stacker, it allows for a 140mm square fan inside the cage with 1/8" or so clearance on each side. At maximum, the length of the assembly shouldn't exceed 300mm if I need to use two 5.25" drive-bays for external access -- hot-swap, switches, USB3 ports, optical drives or LED panels.
Customer reviews always reflect a larger percentage of negatives if consumers have more reason to complain. A QC sample may show a smaller percentage. However, complaints of a similar nature would either forwarn of impossible problems, or indicate procedures for correcting those problems before fully deploying the cooler.