Correct you are. Current flash cards have an almost 2x faster transfer rate than most cameras can support. So the bottleneck in 98% of cases is the camera, not the flash memory.Originally posted by: LS20
theyre all the same
the speed of the card wouldnt be the bottle neck unless we're talking file transfer from PC <-> CF... not camera<->cf
Originally posted by: GtPrOjEcTX
I have a 256 Crucial CF and a 512 Sandisk CF. I can't tell a difference in speed
Type I ?Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Also the 1 Gig cards are out now.Originally posted by: GtPrOjEcTX
I have a 256 Crucial CF and a 512 Sandisk CF. I can't tell a difference in speed
Originally posted by: cbeavers
Well I just bought a Kingston 256mb compact flash card from Kingston.com for 55 bucks and a 15 dollar MIR. What a bargain. Got the link from the Hot Deals forum from Anandtech Deals dude
Thanks
Lexar ships 4 GB 40x Compact FlashOriginally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: GtPrOjEcTX
I have a 256 Crucial CF and a 512 Sandisk CF. I can't tell a difference in speed
Also the 1 Gig cards are out now.
That article seems to say that the camera itself is the limiting speed factor. Also, it hasn't been updated 10/31/01.Originally posted by: tigerbait
Compact Flash Comparison