http://www.digitimes.com/displays/a20041021A8066.html
who knows how much better this will be compared to 16ms
who knows how much better this will be compared to 16ms
Originally posted by: klah
Half the time the response time is worse than the 20ms Hydis panel: http://graphics.tomshardware.c.../20041015/benq-03.html
This ISO standard for response times is bullshit and needs to be replaced. Now they are creating panels that only improve in black/white transitions so they can slap a better rating on it.
Originally posted by: jiffylube1024
Originally posted by: klah
Half the time the response time is worse than the 20ms Hydis panel: http://graphics.tomshardware.c.../20041015/benq-03.html
This ISO standard for response times is bullshit and needs to be replaced. Now they are creating panels that only improve in black/white transitions so they can slap a better rating on it.
It's more like 33% of the time (for being a bit slower than the 20ms Hydis) only but, yeah, the ISO standard does leave a lot to interpretation, and response time should definately be viewed as a "peak" rating.
Also, what is up with BenQ's insistance of putting that moronic bright, huge blue LED in the middle of the panel? On my Samsung 710T, it's a tiny spec of green in the corner (as on most Samsungs), but Benq puts it right in your face.