benchmarks inside p4 2.8 800x600

[Wolfsraider]

here are the benchmarks of my system finally updated with 800x600

memory
cpu
arithmetic
cache
hdtach
pcmark
3dmark2001
pcmark2000
ut2003 system benchmark

do these seem on par with a comparable system?
the hdd score i redid after defragging the hdd and it went to 34400 wow does that seem right?
memory scores don't seem that good also.

thanks for looking and opinions
mike


edited as below

• p4 2.8 @ 3150
• epox 4g4a+
• corsair xms 3000 ddr ram
• ati 9700 pro
• lsi u160 scsi controller card
• drives

1. ibm 36z15 15000 rpm hdd
2. dvd drive
3. liteon drive
4. floppy

i had to change them in the album from 800x600 to 1280x1024 to get them to show up as 800x600 sorry about them being so small

 

[AdamK47]

How about screenshots that are easier to read? If you use ALT+PRTSCR it will copy the active window into clipboard. Some specs inside the thread would also be immensely helpful too.

 

[THUGSROOK]

wouldnt it be easier to just type out the results?
we trust ya, dont need to see sceenies 😛
(screenies can be easily faked anyways)

your scores are spot on ~ very nice 🙂

 

[MetroRider]

i agree with what AdamK47 - 3DS said. either use the ALT-PrintSCRN method, or dont rescale the images to 480x360. Let them be 800x600, or 640x480 at the very least. This would save us from having to use the magnifying glass here on windows from having to zoom into the images at 400%, haha 😉

 

[Wolfsraider]

oops my bad the web site shrinks them for an album i will try to enlarge them sorry guys

edited the pics
same pics as i am running seti@home right now and didn't want to lose any time

hdtach ran today all others are about 2 weeks old give or take (ran with seti running)

thanks thugsrook as always your help is always appreciated🙂

i also added the specs into the thread as requested

and no more is it necessary to magnify @400% 😛

 

[Duvie]

HDD score in pcmark2000 really sucks....I get 1024 on a 40gig WD 7200rpm ATA100 drive even when it is not defragged....Do you have the appropriate Intel drivers for accelerated performance???

 

[THUGSROOK]

oh comon Duvie ~ we all know its PCMark that sux 😉
(dont waste your time chasin that ghost)

 

[Wolfsraider]

lol thanks for the info duvie and thugsrook

psst i dont like madonion except for them purdy graphics lol

i like ut2003 mark though it's got purdier graphics and i can't finish the benchmark cause the itch to play gets too bad

homer simpson voice "mmmmmmmm ut2003" homer simpson voice

 

[oldfart]

HDTach sems a little goofy with your scsi setup. 70.3% CPU utilization??!! :Q Nice access time though!

And yes, it would be better to just list the results in text format. Too many links to open and look at screenshots.

 

[Wolfsraider]

ok next time only text lol sorry guys

yes it does seem goofy as it rises to 84.ran it three times got 87,70 and 69?

but it does give me a better idea about the access speeds😀