Benchmarking Unreal Tournament 2003's Demo

[pm]

I was reading the "readme.txt" after having played the game for a while and I noticed that there's an easy benchmarking program in UT2003's demo. There's a benchmarking program in the System directory. Run "benchmark.exe", choose the resolution you want, and it runs four scenes and produces a score/FPS number.

Has anybody else tried it? Anyone want to put up a couple of benchmarking scores to make us envious (like fkloster?)?

I got Fly-by: 126.6 Botmatch: 52.8 on 1024x768 with my 2GHz Pentium 4 and GeForce 4 Ti4200 - both running at default.

 

[Dulanic]

147
56
at 1024x768

1600+ @ 1.75Ghz 166FSB
GeForce 4 4400 @ 300/620

 

[LukFilm]

77
47
at 1280x960

P4 1.6A@2.3Ghz
GeForce 3 Ti200 @ 210/470

 

[Rand]

Thread 1
Thread 2

Might want to check out the above two threads, between those there is a good 30 or so people posting benchmarks.

 

[pm]

I searched the GH forum before posting. I didn't think of video..

 

[Crusty]

62
20
800x600 :disgust:

2x piii @733 + Radeon 8500dv +1024mb pc133 ram

gonna upgrade to a hammer once they are out thought!

 

[apoppin]

Originally posted by: pm
I searched the GH forum before posting. I didn't think of video..

Also Software and CPU O/C'ing. But it seems very appropriate for General as it involves GPU and CPU intensive tests.

My little Celeron @1.5Ghz 384MB PC-133 SDRAM and stock Radeon 8500 (Win98SE):

98
38
1024x768

101
37
640x480

79
35
1280x960

and lets try 8x AA and 4x Smoothvision @
26
20
1024x768
(I'd guess I need both better video AND processor for more than this slow-as-molassis display).

With only 4xAA and 2x Smoothvision it's better - playable but there is still artifacting
61
36
1024x768

 

[SteelyKen]

dm-asbestos
3.616891 / 51.801281 / 138.927582 fps
Score = 51.828327

ctf-citadel
16.517738 / 73.380493 / 294.719513 fps
Score = 73.502312

dm-antalus
24.477997 / 93.998276 / 332.434265 fps
Score = 94.015190

dm-asbestos
26.083117 / 148.932220 / 450.190613 fps
Score = 149.047638

ctf-citadel
9.584263 / 44.308102 / 109.490250 fps
Score = 44.371033

br-anubis
22.416084 / 65.663956 / 137.075562 fps
Score = 65.667725

dm-antalus
3.600674 / 42.141109 / 84.584290 fps
Score = 42.161591

Windows XP 5.1 (Build: 2600)
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor (Athlon XP) @ 1675 MHz with 511MB RAM
Radeon 8500 (Omega/Plutonium X1.0.71a) (6071)

1024 x 768 - All settings on ultra high, but no fsaa

 

[Sniper82]

Everything maxed at 1024x768 except no FSAA

100 flyby
36 botmatch

1.4 Athlon
256mb PC2100
Radeon 8500 250/250
KT266a

 

[Utterman]

Flyby: 110.418030
Botmatch: 37.604992


Sys: 1.33Ghz Thunderbird @ 1.4Ghz, Stock Geforce4 4400, 768 megs of RAM

 

[Maggotry]

There's also this thread that has about 3 pages of benchmark data.

 

[kyoshozx]

Flyby 165.36
botmatch 54.82

 

[GT1999]

I'm getting sort of high scores for an SDRAM TBird 1.1G setup + GF3 Ti200, compared to some other people I know who ran the bench w/ Ti200's and 1.4G/DDR. I don't know why either.


1024x768
29.3 Bot
77.5 Fly

 

[Maggotry]

1024x768

Flyby: 140.459
Bot: 52.66

 

[foofoo]

flyby 123.3
botmatch 46.2
1024 x 768

shuttle ss51g, 1.8a @ 1.9, 512mb samsung, gainward gf4ti4200

 

[nightowl]

Flyby: 100
Bot Match: 51
@ 1024x768

With a 1.6a @ 2.13 and a 8500LE @ 230/230

 

[Chadder007]

Ive got the same setup as you NightOwl.....will benchmark this sucker when I get home to it.

 

[yllus]

Flyby: 72.861061
Botmatch: 27.400383

Resolution: 800x600

With a Celeron II 900 @ 1126 (124 MHz FSB)
GeForce 2 GTS @ 215/360

 

[SupermanCK]

Thread Over at CPU/OC forum

 

[CTho9305]

Originally posted by: yllus
Flyby: 72.861061
Botmatch: 27.400383

Resolution: 800x600

With a Celeron II 900 @ 1126 (124 MHz FSB)
GeForce 2 GTS @ 215/360

GF2 GTS is the limiting factor for me (@1024x768, at least), athy 750

 

[Dug]

P4 @ 2.8, 4400 @ 300/650

FLY: 158
BOT: 65

 

[ElFenix]

soo much better than 3dmark scores... finally an extremely repeatable, free benchmark based on an actual game.

 

[Dug]

soo much better than 3dmark scores... finally an extremely repeatable, free benchmark based on an actual game.

But I thought this has 1/2 the polygons or textures (?) that the release version will have. So it would be a benchmark based on an actual demo.

 

[BlindSeaman]

Is it me or are these low scores for my system?

System:
1gig Duron
384mb PC133
Ti4200 @4400 clock/memory

Flyby: 75
Botmatch: 24

Resolution: 1024x768

I'm starting to think its time for a new mobo/processor

 

[wfbberzerker]

flyby: 95.9
botmatch: 32.7
(1024x768)

system:
1.33ghz athlon t-bird
256mb pc2100
radeon 8500 @ stock speed