Benchmark your computer @4K with Handbrake 1.1 and H265! NOW WITH ZEN3!

[thesmokingman]

What's that? Something between 3.7 and 4.5 right? It can vary depending on your part and cooling.

Yea, 3.7ghz base and 4.5ghz boost single core.

 

[Makaveli]

What's that? Something between 3.7 and 4.5 right? It can vary depending on your part and cooling.

better to just list stock frequency and not boost clocks which will vary on location, temps and how good your cooling is.

 

[Xenon]

Ryzen 5 1600AF @4.0 ghz
16gb ddr4 @3200mhz

encoded 1806 frames in 504.29s (3.58 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09

I tried to run @4.1 ghz but crashed at the start. Upped voltage to 1.30 then crashed at 90%. I guess I'll stay at 4.0 ghz.

Edit: Ran it on a couple more machines.

I5-3570k
16gb ddr3 2400

1206.06s (1.50 fps)

I5-1035G4 1.1ghz 3.7 boost 4c/8t (250 dollar Walmart special dell laptop)
8gb ddr4 2666

1126.01s (1.60 fps)

 

[Hulk]

Update. If you don't see your score it's because I'm not including any scores where the CPU frequency (average) during the test isn't known. Send me the frequency during the run and I'll add your rig.

Rank	User	CPU	GHz	seconds	fps	Architecture	Cores	GHz/fps x #cores
1	Micromd	2 - Xeon 8260L ES 48/96	3.9​	156.99​	11.50​	Cascade Lake	48	16.273​
2	Kjboughton	E5-2696 2x18 36/72	3.99​	174.06​	10.38​	Broadwell	36	13.844​
3	Kjboughton	E5-2696 2x16 32/32 (no HT)	3.99​	192.66​	9.37​	Broadwell	32	13.621​
4	DrMrLordX	3900x 12/24	4.1​	198.75​	9.09​	Zen 2	12	5.414​
5	rvborgh	Quad Opteron (48xK10)	3​	200​	9.03​	Piledriver	48	15.947​
6	Cata40	7840xe 18/36	3.4​	211​	8.56​	Skylake	18	7.150​
7	Fir	2990WX 32/64	4.1​	216.35​	8.35​	Zen+	32	15.717​
8	Markfw	1950x 16/32	3.8​	242.49​	7.45​	Zen	16	8.164​
9	mrpiggy	E5-2699 18/36	3.7​	253.41​	7.13​	Haswell	18	9.345​
10	eek2121	1950x 16/32	4.1​	254.04​	7.11​	Zen	16	9.228​
11	Lexingtonian	Quad Opteron 6386	3.5​	275.66​	6.55​	Piledriver	64	34.190​
12	CricketSP	9900k 8/16	4.9​	281.8​	6.41​	Coffee Lake	8	6.117​
13	sdifox	3700x 8/16	3.94​	287.06​	6.29​	Zen 2	8	5.010​
14	CricketSP	9900k 8/16	4.7​	291.87​	6.19​	Coffee Lake	8	6.077​
15	Makaveli	3800x 8/16	4.9	292.4​	6.18​	Zen 2	8	6.347​
19	TillausHamburg	Xeon ES QL1L 20/40	2​	297.54​	6.07​	Skylake SP	20	6.590​
16	Chaotic42	9700k 8/8	5​	311.03​	5.81​	Coffee Lake	8	6.889​
17	XabanakFanatik	5960x 8/16	4.7​	319.84​	5.65​	Haswell	8	6.659​
18	DooKey	7820X 8/16	4.5​	320.75​	5.63​	Skylake	8	6.394​
20	epsilon 84	8700K 8/16 (5/4.9)	5​	340.42​	5.31​	Coffee Lake	8	7.540​
21	JoeRambo	8700k 8/16 (4.8/4.4)	4.8​	342.38​	5.27​	Coffee Lake	8	7.280​
22	mjdupuis	8700k 8/16 (4.8/4.8)	4.8​	347.5​	5.20​	Coffee Lake	8	7.389​
23	IEC	8700K 8/16 (4.7/4.7)	4.7​	359.41​	5.02​	Coffee Lake	8	7.483​
24	aclose3	3600x 8/16	4​	367.2​	4.92​	Zen 2	8	6.506​
25	CakeMonster	8700k 8/16 (4.9/4.6)	4.9​	379.09​	4.76​	Coffee Lake	8	8.228​
26	cmdrdredd	8700K 8/16 (4.7/4.5)	4.7​	386.65​	4.67​	Coffee Lake	8	8.050​
27	rgba	8700 8/16	4.3​	387.57​	4.66​	Coffee Lake	8	7.382​
28	Markfw	E5-2696v3 14/28	2.5​	394.29​	4.58​	Broadwell	14	7.641​
29	Markfw	2700x 8/16	4.1​	404.44​	4.47​	Zen+	8	7.345​
30	lightmanek	Ryzen 7 2700x 8/16	4​	414.34​	4.36​	Zen+	8	7.342​
31	.vodka	Ryzen 1700x 8/16	3.95​	416.04​	4.34​	Zen	8	7.280​
32	pjmssn	Dual Xeon E5-2690 16/32	2.9​	416.47​	4.34​	Sandy Bridge EP	16	10.700​
33	Franz316	2700x 8/16	3.8​	429.95​	4.20​	Zen+	8	7.237​
34	.vodka	Ryzen 1700x 8/16	3.8​	430.69​	4.19​	Zen	8	7.250​
35	AnnoyedGrunt	Ryzen 7 2700x 8/16	4.1​	430.94​	4.19​	Zen+	8	7.827​
36	richaron	Ryzen 1700 6/12 (Ubuntu 18.04)	3.7​	434.68​	4.15​	Zen	6	5.343​
37	CrackRabbit	2700x 8/16	3.8​	440.29​	4.10​	Zen+	8	7.411​
38	Despoiler	Ryzen 1700 6/12	3.9​	444.03​	4.07​	Zen	6	5.753​
39	dfenton	Ryzen 1700 6/12	3.7​	476.9​	3.79​	Zen	6	5.862​
40	Xenon	Ryzen 5 1600AF 6/12	4​	504.29​	3.58​	Zen+	6	6.702​
41	William Gaatjes	Ryzen 2600 6/12 (memory 3200)	3.6​	519.91​	3.47​	Zen	6	6.218​
42	mjdupuis	Ryzen 2600x 6/12	4.2​	520.3​	3.47​	Zen+	6	7.260​
43	ChippyUK	i5-8400 6/6	4​	558.91​	3.23​	Coffee Lake	6	7.427​
44	ywasmd	i5 8400 6/6	4​	562.68​	3.21​	Coffee Lake	6	7.477​
45	William Gaatjes	Ryzen 2600 6/12 (memory 2933)	3.6​	577.26​	3.13​	Zen	6	6.904​
46	gamervivek	Ryzen 1600 6/12	3.5​	593.1​	3.05​	Zen	6	6.897​
47	CronoReverse	4790k 4/8	4.5​	644.52​	2.80​	Haswell	4	6.424​
48	Hulk	4770K 4/8	3.9​	754.96​	2.39​	Haswell	4	6.521​
49	jones377	4770K 4/8	3.9​	768.63​	2.35​	Haswell	4	6.639​
50	Nathan Gall	4770K 4/8	3.9​	775.24​	2.33​	Haswell	4	6.696​
51	Junky228	Xeon w3690 6/12	4​	886.67​	2.04​	Westmere EP	6	11.783​
52	Imported_stryfe	2600k 4/8	4.5​	951.72​	1.90​	Sandy Bridge	4	9.486​
53	Bubbleawsome	i5-7300HQ (laptop) 4/4	3.2​	1022.42​	1.77​	Kaby Lake	4	7.246​
54	Hulk	8250u 4/8 (Surface 2 laptop)	2.5​	1067.13​	1.69​	Kaby Lake R	4	5.909​
55	NickatNight1980	FX8320 4/8	4.16​	1117.63​	1.62​	Piledriver	4	10.298​
56	Xenon	i5-3570k 4/4	3.8​	1206.06​	1.50​	Ivy Bridge	4	10.151​
57	mylesrom	i5-3570 4/4	3.8​	1399.56​	1.29​	Ivy Bridge	4	11.779​
58	dfenton	i5-3570s 4/4	3.6​	1586.81​	1.14​	Ivy Bridge	4	12.652​
59	Imported_stryfe	i5-750 4/4	2.8​	2012.8​	0.90​	Lynnfield	4	12.482​
60	Slim Fan	Pentium Silver J5005 (NUK) 4/4	2.8​	2631.13​	0.69​	Goldmont Plus	4	16.317​
61	PeterScott	Core 2 Quad Q9400 4/4	3.2​	2655.1​	0.68​	Yorkfield	4	18.818​
62	ywasmd	i5 3210 (Macbook Pro) 2/4	3.1​	3144.79​	0.57​	Ivy Bridge	2	10.796​
63	Fanatical Meat	Q9650 4/4	3​	3439.2​	0.53​	Yorkfield	4	22.852​
64	dfenton	Celeron N3450 (laptop) 4/4	2.2​	5099.43​	0.35​	Apollo Lake	4	24.848​
65	dfenton	Celeron 2957U 2/2	1.4​	6027.14​	0.30​	Haswell	2	9.344​

 

[Hulk]

I think this is pretty interesting. I added a column named "efficiency" which is basically how fast each core in the system running at 1GHz can render in fps. For example, if you have a 4 core system running at 4GHz that renders the test at 2fps then each core running at 1GHz is rendering at a rate of 0.125fps. The higher the number the better your cores are at this test. Of course this penalizes the CPU's with high core counts because Handbrake doesn't seem to fully utilize cores well after about 10 or so cores. Just another way to look at the data.

Rank	User	CPU	GHz	seconds	efficiency (fps/core/GHz)	fps	Architecture	Cores
1	sdifox	3700x 8/16	3.94​	287.06​	0.200​	6.29​	Zen 2	8
2	richaron	Ryzen 1700 6/12 (Ubuntu 18.04)	3.70​	434.68​	0.187​	4.15​	Zen	6
3	DrMrLordX	3900x 12/24	4.10​	198.75​	0.185​	9.09​	Zen 2	12
4	Despoiler	Ryzen 1700 6/12	3.90​	444.03​	0.174​	4.07​	Zen	6
5	dfenton	Ryzen 1700 6/12	3.70​	476.9​	0.171​	3.79​	Zen	6
6	Hulk	8250u 4/8 (Surface 2 laptop)	2.50​	1067.13​	0.169​	1.69​	Kaby Lake R	4
7	CricketSP	9900k 8/16	4.70​	291.87​	0.165​	6.19​	Coffee Lake	8
8	CricketSP	9900k 8/16	4.90​	281.8​	0.163​	6.41​	Coffee Lake	8
9	William Gaatjes	Ryzen 2600 6/12 (memory 3200)	3.60​	519.91​	0.161​	3.47​	Zen	6
10	Makaveli	3800x 8/16	4.90	292.4​	0.158​	6.18​	Zen 2	8
11	DooKey	7820X 8/16	4.50​	320.75​	0.156​	5.63​	Skylake	8
12	CronoReverse	4790k 4/8	4.50​	644.52​	0.156​	2.80​	Haswell	4
13	aclose3	3600x 8/16	4.00​	367.2​	0.154​	4.92​	Zen 2	8
14	Hulk	4770K 4/8	3.90​	754.96​	0.153​	2.39​	Haswell	4
15	TillausHamburg	Xeon ES QL1L 20/40	2.00​	297.54​	0.152​	6.07​	Skylake SP	20
19	jones377	4770K 4/8	3.90​	768.63​	0.151​	2.35​	Haswell	4
16	XabanakFanatik	5960x 8/16	4.70​	319.84​	0.150​	5.65​	Haswell	8
17	Nathan Gall	4770K 4/8	3.90​	775.24​	0.149​	2.33​	Haswell	4
18	Xenon	Ryzen 5 1600AF 6/12	4.00​	504.29​	0.149​	3.58​	Zen+	6
20	Chaotic42	9700k 8/8	5.00​	311.03​	0.145​	5.81​	Coffee Lake	8
21	gamervivek	Ryzen 1600 6/12	3.50​	593.1​	0.145​	3.05​	Zen	6
22	William Gaatjes	Ryzen 2600 6/12 (memory 2933)	3.60​	577.26​	0.145​	3.13​	Zen	6
23	Cata40	7840xe 18/36	3.40​	211​	0.140​	8.56​	Skylake	18
24	Franz316	2700x 8/16	3.80​	429.95​	0.138​	4.20​	Zen+	8
25	Bubbleawsome	i5-7300HQ (laptop) 4/4	3.20​	1022.42​	0.138​	1.77​	Kaby Lake	4
26	.vodka	Ryzen 1700x 8/16	3.80​	430.69​	0.138​	4.19​	Zen	8
27	mjdupuis	Ryzen 2600x 6/12	4.20​	520.3​	0.138​	3.47​	Zen+	6
28	.vodka	Ryzen 1700x 8/16	3.95​	416.04​	0.137​	4.34​	Zen	8
29	JoeRambo	8700k 8/16 (4.8/4.4)	4.80​	342.38​	0.137​	5.27​	Coffee Lake	8
30	lightmanek	Ryzen 7 2700x 8/16	4.00​	414.34​	0.136​	4.36​	Zen+	8
31	Markfw	2700x 8/16	4.10​	404.44​	0.136​	4.47​	Zen+	8
32	rgba	8700 8/16	4.30​	387.57​	0.135​	4.66​	Coffee Lake	8
33	mjdupuis	8700k 8/16 (4.8/4.8)	4.80​	347.5​	0.135​	5.20​	Coffee Lake	8
34	CrackRabbit	2700x 8/16	3.80​	440.29​	0.135​	4.10​	Zen+	8
35	ChippyUK	i5-8400 6/6	4.00​	558.91​	0.135​	3.23​	Coffee Lake	6
36	ywasmd	i5 8400 6/6	4.00​	562.68​	0.134​	3.21​	Coffee Lake	6
37	IEC	8700K 8/16 (4.7/4.7)	4.70​	359.41​	0.134​	5.02​	Coffee Lake	8
38	epsilon 84	8700K 8/16 (5/4.9)	5.00​	340.42​	0.133​	5.31​	Coffee Lake	8
39	Markfw	E5-2696v3 14/28	2.50​	394.29​	0.131​	4.58​	Broadwell	14
40	AnnoyedGrunt	Ryzen 7 2700x 8/16	4.10​	430.94​	0.128​	4.19​	Zen+	8
41	cmdrdredd	8700K 8/16 (4.7/4.5)	4.70​	386.65​	0.124​	4.67​	Coffee Lake	8
42	Markfw	1950x 16/32	3.80​	242.49​	0.122​	7.45​	Zen	16
43	CakeMonster	8700k 8/16 (4.9/4.6)	4.90​	379.09​	0.122​	4.76​	Coffee Lake	8
44	eek2121	1950x 16/32	4.10​	254.04​	0.108​	7.11​	Zen	16
45	dfenton	Celeron 2957U 2/2	1.40​	6027.14​	0.107​	0.30​	Haswell	2
46	mrpiggy	E5-2699 18/36	3.70​	253.41​	0.107​	7.13​	Haswell	18
47	Imported_stryfe	2600k 4/8	4.50​	951.72​	0.105​	1.90​	Sandy Bridge	4
48	Xenon	i5-3570k 4/4	3.80​	1206.06​	0.099​	1.50​	Ivy Bridge	4
49	NickatNight1980	FX8320 4/8	4.16​	1117.63​	0.097​	1.62​	Piledriver	4
50	pjmssn	Dual Xeon E5-2690 16/32	2.90​	416.47​	0.093​	4.34​	Sandy Bridge EP	16
51	ywasmd	i5 3210 (Macbook Pro) 2/4	3.10​	3144.79​	0.093​	0.57​	Ivy Bridge	2
52	mylesrom	i5-3570 4/4	3.80​	1399.56​	0.085​	1.29​	Ivy Bridge	4
53	Junky228	Xeon w3690 6/12	4.00​	886.67​	0.085​	2.04​	Westmere EP	6
54	Imported_stryfe	i5-750 4/4	2.80​	2012.8​	0.080​	0.90​	Lynnfield	4
55	dfenton	i5-3570s 4/4	3.60​	1586.81​	0.079​	1.14​	Ivy Bridge	4
56	Kjboughton	E5-2696 2x16 32/32 (no HT)	3.99​	192.66​	0.073​	9.37​	Broadwell	32
57	Kjboughton	E5-2696 2x18 36/72	3.99​	174.06​	0.072​	10.38​	Broadwell	36
58	Fir	2990WX 32/64	4.10​	216.35​	0.064​	8.35​	Zen+	32
59	rvborgh	Quad Opteron (48xK10)	3.00​	200​	0.063​	9.03​	Piledriver	48
60	Micromd	2 - Xeon 8260L ES 48/96	3.90​	156.99​	0.061​	11.50​	Cascade Lake	48
61	Slim Fan	Pentium Silver J5005 (NUK) 4/4	2.80​	2631.13​	0.061​	0.69​	Goldmont Plus	4
62	PeterScott	Core 2 Quad Q9400 4/4	3.20​	2655.1​	0.053​	0.68​	Yorkfield	4
63	Fanatical Meat	Q9650 4/4	3.00​	3439.2​	0.044​	0.53​	Yorkfield	4
64	dfenton	Celeron N3450 (laptop) 4/4	2.20​	5099.43​	0.040​	0.35​	Apollo Lake	4
65	Lexingtonian	Quad Opteron 6386	3.50​	275.66​	0.029​	6.55​	Piledriver	64

 

[sdifox]

At last, I win at something!

 

[Hulk]

Here is efficiency by core based on my definition above. I only included CPUs with up to 16 cores. Not really enough samples to get good results but still fun!

Core	Efficiency
Zen 2	0.174​
Kaby Lake R	0.169​
Skylake	0.156​
Zen	0.152​
Haswell	0.151​
Coffee Lake	0.138​
Zen+	0.132​
Sandy Bridge	0.105​
Ivy Bridge (no HT)	0.089​
Westmere	0.085​
Lynnfield	0.079​
Yorkfield	0.048​

 

[sdifox]

I am not sure that is all that useful. Grouping by same chip then average out the score is probably more representative since there are variances between cpu/system. You are gonna need more samples of course.

 

[Hulk]

I am not sure that is all that useful. Grouping by same chip then average out the score is probably more representative since there are variances between cpu/system. You are gonna need more samples of course.

That wouldn't isolate the cores which is what I'm trying to do. Like I wrote above just for fun!

 

[Micrornd]

HandBrake 1.1.0 64bit
OS: Windows 10 Pro for Workstations
CPU: 2 - Xeon 8260L ES 2.3ghz/3.9ghz
Ram: 48GB DDR4 2400 running @ 2933
GPU Information: AMD Radeon VII
Motherboard - Asus WS C621E SAGE
In Handbrake 1.1.0 - encoded 1806 frames in 156.99s (11.50 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09

Frequency while running the test?

All cores were bouncing between 2.6 and 3.1ghz
Windows Task Manager Performance tab showed and average of 2.78ghz

I guess that messes up your charts, sorry

 

[Micrornd]

I ran some further tests using this pair of 8260Ls as they were meant to be used, multi-tasking, as that is more representative of it's architecture.
Even with 4 instances of Handbrake running, they still showed a bouncing load of only 85-95% with and occasional peak to 100%.
I would be interested in knowing how this compares to some of the other multi-cpu systems here.

Handbrake 1.1.0 and Demo file(s) (LG New York HDR UHD 4K Demo.ts)

4 instances at the same time, all using the same copy of the same file at the same time
(LG New York HDR UHD 4K Demo.ts)
encoded 1806 frames in 376.85s (4.79 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09
encoded 1806 frames in 373.84s (4.83 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09
encoded 1806 frames in 375.22s (4.81 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09
encoded 1806 frames in 376.90s (4.79 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09

4 instances at the same time, all using a different copy of the same file
(LG New York HDR UHD 4K Demo 1.ts, LG New York HDR UHD 4K Demo 2.ts, LG New York HDR UHD 4K Demo 3.ts, LG New York HDR UHD 4K Demo 4.ts)
encoded 1806 frames in 387.35s (4.66 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09
encoded 1806 frames in 382.85s (4.72 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09
encoded 1806 frames in 388.67s (4.65 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09
encoded 1806 frames in 386.04s (4.68 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09

3 instances at the same time, all using a different copy of the same file
(LG New York HDR UHD 4K Demo 1.ts, LG New York HDR UHD 4K Demo 2.ts, LG New York HDR UHD 4K Demo 3.ts)
encoded 1806 frames in 291.22s (6.20 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09
encoded 1806 frames in 292.35s (6.18 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09
encoded 1806 frames in 293.94s (6.14 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09

2 instances at the same time, all using a different copy of the same file
(LG New York HDR UHD 4K Demo 1.ts, LG New York HDR UHD 4K Demo 2.ts)
encoded 1806 frames in 222.05s (8.13 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09
encoded 1806 frames in 211.97s (8.52 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09

1 instance
(LG New York HDR UHD 4K Demo.ts)
encoded 1806 frames in 156.99s (11.50 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09

 

[Hulk]

I ran some further tests using this pair of 8260Ls as they were meant to be used, multi-tasking, as that is more representative of it's architecture.

Very cool. Adding up those 4 instances fps-wise gives 19.22fps. Meaning if handbrake were better optimized your system would probably do the test in about 94 seconds.

 

[thesmokingman]

Update. If you don't see your score it's because I'm not including any scores where the CPU frequency (average) during the test isn't known. Send me the frequency during the run and I'll add your rig.

​

WTF? Ryzens don't have a set clock. And wtf is this changing rules out of no where? You have to set rules in the OP. This is some ridiculous crap.

 

[aclos3]

As a bit of an update to my run, I ran again and watched the core speeds and temp in Ryzen master. It really seemed to average out to 4.04Ghz on all six cores. I am on stock cooling and started the run with a hot processor that had been running Rosetta @Home. Temps stayed right around 75C throughout the run. I am on the stock cooler with stock thermal pad. I might try to lower these temps, but I am well below the thermal threshold (95C) and not overclocking.

I have PM'd Hulk about correcting the chart, since it has the 3600x listed as an 8/16 part, when it should be 6/12.

AMD Ryzen 3600x
32 Gb DDR4 3600 (16-19-19-39)
Asus x570 TUF Gaming Plus (DOCP profile for memory to run 1:1)

encoded 1806 frames in 367.20s (4.92 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09

 

[Hulk]

WTF? Ryzens don't have a set clock. And wtf is this changing rules out of no where? You have to set rules in the OP. This is some ridiculous crap.

Please check task manager and see what your average speed seems to be when running the test and let me know. I"ll post your score!

 

[Hulk]

Will fix on the next chart update

As a bit of an update to my run, I ran again and watched the core speeds and temp in Ryzen master. It really seemed to average out to 4.04Ghz on all six cores. I am on stock cooling and started the run with a hot processor that had been running Rosetta @Home. Temps stayed right around 75C throughout the run. I am on the stock cooler with stock thermal pad. I might try to lower these temps, but I am well below the thermal threshold (95C) and not overclocking.

I have PM'd Hulk about correcting the chart, since it has the 3600x listed as an 8/16 part, when it should be 6/12.

AMD Ryzen 3600x
32 Gb DDR4 3600 (16-19-19-39)
Asus x570 TUF Gaming Plus (DOCP profile for memory to run 1:1)

encoded 1806 frames in 367.20s (4.92 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09

Will fix on the next chart update!

 

[Junky228]

my buddy upgraded and gave me his old mobo and cpu, a different westmere xeon (still 6 core though) and a nicer mobo than mine, once I get that up and running I'll be able to provide a second data point for westmere performance not that anyone really cares about such an old chip lol

oh I also have a w3520 (equivalent to an i7 920, quad core) that i could get stable to 4.4GHz in the past, but I don't really want to set that up again :/ could be a data point for Bloomfield i guess...actually now that I think of it, once i set up the other system I just have to drop that cpu in ... hmmm

...and my family's desktop is running an i5-650! oh boy I gotta get busy

 

[Xenon]

Some clarification. The 3570k on my run is overclocked to 4.0. Also, I reran the I5-1035g4 alongside hwmonitor. The 4 cores bounce back and forth between 2.0ghz and 2.2ghz, so I would say 2.1ghz was average.

 

[Hulk]

Some clarification. The 3570k on my run is overclocked to 4.0. Also, I reran the I5-1035g4 alongside hwmonitor. The 4 cores bounce back and forth between 2.0ghz and 2.2ghz, so I would say 2.1ghz was average.

That $250 laptop you got at Walmart has a pretty nice Ice Lake CPU. What is the model?

 

[Hulk]

Rank	User	CPU	GHz	seconds	fps/core/GHz	fps	Architecture	Cores
1	Micromd	2 - Xeon 8260L ES 48/96	2.80​	156.99​	0.086​	11.50​	Cascade Lake	48
2	Kjboughton	E5-2696 2x18 36/72	3.99​	174.06​	0.072​	10.38​	Broadwell	36
3	Kjboughton	E5-2696 2x16 32/32 (no HT)	3.99​	192.66​	0.073​	9.37​	Broadwell	32
4	DrMrLordX	3900x 12/24	4.10​	198.75​	0.185​	9.09​	Zen 2	12
5	rvborgh	Quad Opteron (48xK10)	3.00​	200​	0.063​	9.03​	Piledriver	48
6	Cata40	7840xe 18/36	3.40​	211​	0.140​	8.56​	Skylake	18
7	Fir	2990WX 32/64	4.10​	216.35​	0.064​	8.35​	Zen+	32
8	Markfw	1950x 16/32	3.80​	242.49​	0.122​	7.45​	Zen	16
9	mrpiggy	E5-2699 18/36	3.70​	253.41​	0.107​	7.13​	Haswell	18
10	eek2121	1950x 16/32	4.10​	254.04​	0.108​	7.11​	Zen	16
11	Lexingtonian	Quad Opteron 6386	3.50​	275.66​	0.029​	6.55​	Piledriver	64
12	CricketSP	9900k 8/16	4.90​	281.8​	0.163​	6.41​	Coffee Lake	8
13	sdifox	3700x 8/16	3.94​	287.06​	0.200​	6.29​	Zen 2	8
14	CricketSP	9900k 8/16	4.70​	291.87​	0.165​	6.19​	Coffee Lake	8
15	Makaveli	3800x 8/16	4.90	292.4​	0.158​	6.18​	Zen 2	8
19	TillausHamburg	Xeon ES QL1L 20/40	2.00​	297.54​	0.152​	6.07​	Skylake SP	20
16	Chaotic42	9700k 8/8	5.00​	311.03​	0.145​	5.81​	Coffee Lake	8
17	XabanakFanatik	5960x 8/16	4.70​	319.84​	0.150​	5.65​	Haswell	8
18	DooKey	7820X 8/16	4.50​	320.75​	0.156​	5.63​	Skylake	8
20	epsilon 84	8700K 8/16 (5/4.9)	5.00​	340.42​	0.133​	5.31​	Coffee Lake	8
21	JoeRambo	8700k 8/16 (4.8/4.4)	4.80​	342.38​	0.137​	5.27​	Coffee Lake	8
22	mjdupuis	8700k 8/16 (4.8/4.8)	4.80​	347.5​	0.135​	5.20​	Coffee Lake	8
23	IEC	8700K 8/16 (4.7/4.7)	4.70​	359.41​	0.134​	5.02​	Coffee Lake	8
24	aclos3	3600x 6/12	4.04​	367.2​	0.203​	4.92​	Zen 2	6
25	CakeMonster	8700k 8/16 (4.9/4.6)	4.90​	379.09​	0.122​	4.76​	Coffee Lake	8
26	cmdrdredd	8700K 8/16 (4.7/4.5)	4.70​	386.65​	0.124​	4.67​	Coffee Lake	8
27	rgba	8700 8/16	4.30​	387.57​	0.135​	4.66​	Coffee Lake	8
28	Markfw	E5-2696v3 14/28	2.50​	394.29​	0.131​	4.58​	Broadwell	14
29	Markfw	2700x 8/16	4.10​	404.44​	0.136​	4.47​	Zen+	8
30	lightmanek	Ryzen 7 2700x 8/16	4.00​	414.34​	0.136​	4.36​	Zen+	8
31	.vodka	Ryzen 1700x 8/16	3.95​	416.04​	0.137​	4.34​	Zen	8
32	pjmssn	Dual Xeon E5-2690 16/32	2.90​	416.47​	0.093​	4.34​	Sandy Bridge EP	16
33	Franz316	2700x 8/16	3.80​	429.95​	0.138​	4.20​	Zen+	8
34	.vodka	Ryzen 1700x 8/16	3.80​	430.69​	0.138​	4.19​	Zen	8
35	AnnoyedGrunt	Ryzen 7 2700x 8/16	4.10​	430.94​	0.128​	4.19​	Zen+	8
36	richaron	Ryzen 1700 6/12 (Ubuntu 18.04)	3.70​	434.68​	0.187​	4.15​	Zen	6
37	CrackRabbit	2700x 8/16	3.80​	440.29​	0.135​	4.10​	Zen+	8
38	Despoiler	Ryzen 1700 6/12	3.90​	444.03​	0.174​	4.07​	Zen	6
39	dfenton	Ryzen 1700 6/12	3.70​	476.9​	0.171​	3.79​	Zen	6
40	Xenon	Ryzen 5 1600AF 6/12	4.00​	504.29​	0.149​	3.58​	Zen+	6
41	William Gaatjes	Ryzen 2600 6/12 (memory 3200)	3.60​	519.91​	0.161​	3.47​	Zen	6
42	mjdupuis	Ryzen 2600x 6/12	4.20​	520.3​	0.138​	3.47​	Zen+	6
43	ChippyUK	i5-8400 6/6	4.00​	558.91​	0.135​	3.23​	Coffee Lake	6
44	ywasmd	i5 8400 6/6	4.00​	562.68​	0.134​	3.21​	Coffee Lake	6
45	William Gaatjes	Ryzen 2600 6/12 (memory 2933)	3.60​	577.26​	0.145​	3.13​	Zen	6
46	gamervivek	Ryzen 1600 6/12	3.50​	593.1​	0.145​	3.05​	Zen	6
47	CronoReverse	4790k 4/8	4.50​	644.52​	0.156​	2.80​	Haswell	4
48	Hulk	4770K 4/8	3.90​	754.96​	0.153​	2.39​	Haswell	4
49	jones377	4770K 4/8	3.90​	768.63​	0.151​	2.35​	Haswell	4
50	Nathan Gall	4770K 4/8	3.90​	775.24​	0.149​	2.33​	Haswell	4
51	Junky228	Xeon w3690 6/12	4.00​	886.67​	0.085​	2.04​	Westmere EP	6
52	Imported_stryfe	2600k 4/8	4.50​	951.72​	0.105​	1.90​	Sandy Bridge	4
53	Bubbleawsome	i5-7300HQ (laptop) 4/4	3.20​	1022.42​	0.138​	1.77​	Kaby Lake	4
54	Hulk	8250u 4/8 (Surface 2 laptop)	2.50​	1067.13​	0.169​	1.69​	Kaby Lake R	4
55	NickatNight1980	FX8320 4/8	4.16​	1117.63​	0.097​	1.62​	Piledriver	4
56	Xenon	i5-1035G4 4/8	2.10​	1126.01​	0.191​	1.60​	Ice Lake	4
57	Xenon	i5-3570k 4/4	4.00​	1206.06​	0.094​	1.50​	Ivy Bridge	4
58	mylesrom	i5-3570 4/4	3.80​	1399.56​	0.085​	1.29​	Ivy Bridge	4
59	dfenton	i5-3570s 4/4	3.60​	1586.81​	0.079​	1.14​	Ivy Bridge	4
60	Imported_stryfe	i5-750 4/4	2.80​	2012.8​	0.080​	0.90​	Lynnfield	4
61	Slim Fan	Pentium Silver J5005 (NUK) 4/4	2.80​	2631.13​	0.061​	0.69​	Goldmont Plus	4
62	PeterScott	Core 2 Quad Q9400 4/4	3.20​	2655.1​	0.053​	0.68​	Yorkfield	4
63	ywasmd	i5 3210 (Macbook Pro) 2/4	3.10​	3144.79​	0.093​	0.57​	Ivy Bridge	2
64	Fanatical Meat	Q9650 4/4	3.00​	3439.2​	0.044​	0.53​	Yorkfield	4
65	dfenton	Celeron N3450 (laptop) 4/4	2.20​	5099.43​	0.040​	0.35​	Apollo Lake	4
66	dfenton	Celeron 2957U 2/2	1.40​	6027.14​	0.107​	0.30​	Haswell	2

 

[Xenon]

That $250 laptop you got at Walmart has a pretty nice Ice Lake CPU. What is the model?

It was this one. Looks like the price has gone up to 299. This was supposed to be an i3 but most people received i5g4 and some even received i5g7's. The box said i3 but once you booted it up you see what you really got. The same happened with a Costco laptop that was priced similarly.

Robot or human?

Secret Walmart Promo Codes: Save 60% Off With July Promo Codes | 2021 Deals & Discounts

Use this valid 65% off Walmart promo code now. See all 25 Walmart promo codes, coupons, discounts & free delivery codes for Aug 2021.

slickdeals.net

 

[Xenon]

Last benchmark from me.

FX-6300 16gb ddr3 1600

1657.66s (1.09 fps)

 

[DrMrLordX]

Just an FYI, but Google Drive is reporting that the source file has reached a quota and might not be available again for a little while. I'm trying to redownload the file to run it again @ 4.4 GHz (or so). Sadly I deleted it after my last run, thinking I could just redownload again later if I needed it. Do we have a second source for the file?

 

[sdifox]

Just an FYI, but Google Drive is reporting that the source file has reached a quota and might not be available again for a little while. I'm trying to redownload the file to run it again @ 4.4 GHz (or so). Sadly I deleted it after my last run, thinking I could just redownload again later if I needed it. Do we have a second source for the file?

Wait, you delete files?

 

[DrMrLordX]

Wait, you delete files?

Yeah, I'm a compulsive deleter. Some stuff I save on an old SSD if I think I might need it again later, but for stuff that's widely-available on the Internet and archived, I don't bother.

Regardless, someone looking to benchmark their system anew who hasn't yet downloaded the file will find that Google Drive won't play ball. Which is a shame.