• Guest, The rules for the P & N subforum have been updated to prohibit "ad hominem" or personal attacks against other posters. See the full details in the post "Politics and News Rules & Guidelines."

Benchmark your computer @4K with Handbrake 1.1 and H265!

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
78,378
6,627
126
Yeah, I'm a compulsive deleter. Some stuff I save on an old SSD if I think I might need it again later, but for stuff that's widely-available on the Internet and archived, I don't bother.

Regardless, someone looking to benchmark their system anew who hasn't yet downloaded the file will find that Google Drive won't play ball. Which is a shame.

et voila. we can all host the file and round robin it :p

 
  • Like
Reactions: Junky228

Kenmitch

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
7,660
758
126
HandBrake 1.1.1 (2018061800) - 64bit
OS: Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.18363.0 - 64bit
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core Processor
Ram: 16337 MB, G.Skill DDR4 3600 MHz CL14

3.94 GHz
encoded 1806 frames in 303.15s (5.96 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09
encoded 1806 frames in 302.73s (5.97 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09

4.1 GHz
encoded 1806 frames in 296.72s (6.09 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09
encoded 1806 frames in 297.85s (6.06 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09

4.2 GHz
encoded 1806 frames in 290.09s (6.23 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09
encoded 1806 frames in 290.43s (6.22 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09

.
 

Hulk

Platinum Member
Oct 9, 1999
2,623
55
91
RankUserCPUGHzsecondsfps/core/GHzfpsArchitectureCores
1Micromd2 - Xeon 8260L ES 48/96
2.80​
156.99​
0.086​
11.50​
Cascade Lake48
2KjboughtonE5-2696 2x18 36/72
3.99​
174.06​
0.072​
10.38​
Broadwell36
3KjboughtonE5-2696 2x16 32/32 (no HT)
3.99​
192.66​
0.073​
9.37​
Broadwell32
4DrMrLordX3900x 12/24
4.10​
198.75​
0.185​
9.09​
Zen 212
5rvborghQuad Opteron (48xK10)
3.00​
200​
0.063​
9.03​
Piledriver48
6Cata407840xe 18/36
3.40​
211​
0.140​
8.56​
Skylake18
7Fir2990WX 32/64
4.10​
216.35​
0.064​
8.35​
Zen+32
8Markfw1950x 16/32
3.80​
242.49​
0.122​
7.45​
Zen16
9mrpiggyE5-2699 18/36
3.70​
253.41​
0.107​
7.13​
Haswell18
10eek21211950x 16/32
4.10​
254.04​
0.108​
7.11​
Zen16
11LexingtonianQuad Opteron 6386
3.50​
275.66​
0.029​
6.55​
Piledriver64
12CricketSP9900k 8/16
4.90​
281.8​
0.163​
6.41​
Coffee Lake8
13sdifox3700x 8/16
3.94​
287.06​
0.200​
6.29​
Zen 28
KenmitchRyzen 7 3700x 8/16
4.20​
290.09​
0.185​
6.23​
Zen 28
14CricketSP9900k 8/16
4.70​
291.87​
0.165​
6.19​
Coffee Lake8
15Makaveli3800x 8/164.90
292.4​
0.158​
6.18​
Zen 28
68KenmitchRyzen 7 3700x 8/16
4.10​
296.72​
0.186​
6.09​
Zen 28
19TillausHamburgXeon ES QL1L 20/40
2.00​
297.54​
0.152​
6.07​
Skylake SP20
67KenmitchRyzen 7 3700x 8/16
3.94​
302.73​
0.189​
5.97​
Zen 28
16Chaotic429700k 8/8
5.00​
311.03​
0.145​
5.81​
Coffee Lake8
17XabanakFanatik5960x 8/16
4.70​
319.84​
0.150​
5.65​
Haswell8
18DooKey7820X 8/16
4.50​
320.75​
0.156​
5.63​
Skylake8
20epsilon 848700K 8/16 (5/4.9)
5.00​
340.42​
0.133​
5.31​
Coffee Lake8
21JoeRambo8700k 8/16 (4.8/4.4)
4.80​
342.38​
0.137​
5.27​
Coffee Lake8
22mjdupuis8700k 8/16 (4.8/4.8)
4.80​
347.5​
0.135​
5.20​
Coffee Lake8
23IEC8700K 8/16 (4.7/4.7)
4.70​
359.41​
0.134​
5.02​
Coffee Lake8
24aclos33600x 6/12
4.04​
367.2​
0.203​
4.92​
Zen 26
25CakeMonster8700k 8/16 (4.9/4.6)
4.90​
379.09​
0.122​
4.76​
Coffee Lake8
26cmdrdredd8700K 8/16 (4.7/4.5)
4.70​
386.65​
0.124​
4.67​
Coffee Lake8
27rgba8700 8/16
4.30​
387.57​
0.135​
4.66​
Coffee Lake8
28MarkfwE5-2696v3 14/28
2.50​
394.29​
0.131​
4.58​
Broadwell14
29Markfw2700x 8/16
4.10​
404.44​
0.136​
4.47​
Zen+8
30lightmanekRyzen 7 2700x 8/16
4.00​
414.34​
0.136​
4.36​
Zen+8
31.vodkaRyzen 1700x 8/16
3.95​
416.04​
0.137​
4.34​
Zen8
32pjmssnDual Xeon E5-2690 16/32
2.90​
416.47​
0.093​
4.34​
Sandy Bridge EP16
33Franz3162700x 8/16
3.80​
429.95​
0.138​
4.20​
Zen+8
34.vodkaRyzen 1700x 8/16
3.80​
430.69​
0.138​
4.19​
Zen8
35AnnoyedGruntRyzen 7 2700x 8/16
4.10​
430.94​
0.128​
4.19​
Zen+8
36richaronRyzen 1700 6/12 (Ubuntu 18.04)
3.70​
434.68​
0.187​
4.15​
Zen6
37CrackRabbit2700x 8/16
3.80​
440.29​
0.135​
4.10​
Zen+8
38DespoilerRyzen 1700 6/12
3.90​
444.03​
0.174​
4.07​
Zen6
39dfentonRyzen 1700 6/12
3.70​
476.9​
0.171​
3.79​
Zen6
40XenonRyzen 5 1600AF 6/12
4.00​
504.29​
0.149​
3.58​
Zen+6
41William GaatjesRyzen 2600 6/12 (memory 3200)
3.60​
519.91​
0.161​
3.47​
Zen6
42mjdupuisRyzen 2600x 6/12
4.20​
520.3​
0.138​
3.47​
Zen+6
43ChippyUKi5-8400 6/6
4.00​
558.91​
0.135​
3.23​
Coffee Lake6
44ywasmdi5 8400 6/6
4.00​
562.68​
0.134​
3.21​
Coffee Lake6
45William GaatjesRyzen 2600 6/12 (memory 2933)
3.60​
577.26​
0.145​
3.13​
Zen6
46gamervivekRyzen 1600 6/12
3.50​
593.1​
0.145​
3.05​
Zen6
47CronoReverse4790k 4/8
4.50​
644.52​
0.156​
2.80​
Haswell4
48Hulk4770K 4/8
3.90​
754.96​
0.153​
2.39​
Haswell4
49jones3774770K 4/8
3.90​
768.63​
0.151​
2.35​
Haswell4
50Nathan Gall4770K 4/8
3.90​
775.24​
0.149​
2.33​
Haswell4
51Junky228Xeon w3690 6/12
4.00​
886.67​
0.085​
2.04​
Westmere EP6
52Imported_stryfe2600k 4/8
4.50​
951.72​
0.105​
1.90​
Sandy Bridge4
53Bubbleawsomei5-7300HQ (laptop) 4/4
3.20​
1022.42​
0.138​
1.77​
Kaby Lake4
54Hulk8250u 4/8 (Surface 2 laptop)
2.50​
1067.13​
0.169​
1.69​
Kaby Lake R4
55NickatNight1980FX8320 4/8
4.16​
1117.63​
0.097​
1.62​
Piledriver4
56Xenoni5-1035G4 4/8
2.10​
1126.01​
0.191​
1.60​
Ice Lake4
57Xenoni5-3570k 4/4
4.00​
1206.06​
0.094​
1.50​
Ivy Bridge4
58mylesromi5-3570 4/4
3.80​
1399.56​
0.085​
1.29​
Ivy Bridge4
59dfentoni5-3570s 4/4
3.60​
1586.81​
0.079​
1.14​
Ivy Bridge4
60XenonFX-6300 6/6
4.10​
1657.66​
0.044​
1.09​
Bulldozer6
61Imported_stryfei5-750 4/4
2.80​
2012.8​
0.080​
0.90​
Lynnfield4
62Slim FanPentium Silver J5005 (NUK) 4/4
2.80​
2631.13​
0.061​
0.69​
Goldmont Plus4
63PeterScottCore 2 Quad Q9400 4/4
3.20​
2655.1​
0.053​
0.68​
Yorkfield4
64ywasmdi5 3210 (Macbook Pro) 2/4
3.10​
3144.79​
0.093​
0.57​
Ivy Bridge2
65Fanatical MeatQ9650 4/4
3.00​
3439.2​
0.044​
0.53​
Yorkfield4
66dfentonCeleron N3450 (laptop) 4/4
2.20​
5099.43​
0.040​
0.35​
Apollo Lake4
67dfentonCeleron 2957U 2/2
1.40​
6027.14​
0.107​
0.30​
Haswell2
 
  • Like
Reactions: lightmanek

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
14,608
3,586
136
et voila. we can all host the file and round robin it :p
At least now we have a second source. Thanks!

@Hulk

Here's a run running on the same 3900x @ static OC of 4.350 GHz:

encoded 1806 frames in 191.78s (9.42 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09

Untitled.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: lightmanek

Junky228

Junior Member
Nov 24, 2013
5
1
66
also just noting that for all my previous runs I was patched for spectre and meltdown, but those fixes are supposed to incur a "potentially significant" performance penalty on my hardware, so I ran another test after disabling them (using inspectre.exe) and rebooting. I actually did get a performance improvement...
from my old score in handbrake 1.1.0 of -->
encoded 1806 frames in 902.22s (2.00 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09

to my best score using 1.1.0 thanks to disabling the security mitigations
encoded 1806 frames in 877.63s (2.06 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09

This was done on my w3670 again, also this is the first time i watched the test as it ran, and noticed that CPU usage bounced between 100 and low 90s, but my clockspeed stayed a steady 4.0GHz. In the screenshots, task manager incorrectly reads my cpu speed, I think it has to do with having my baseclock increased rather than increasing the multiplier (which is a more modern way of overclocking...my multiplier is locked, highest I can go is x25 on all cores or x26 on one core so I have to increase the baseclock instead)
In the screenshots below, you can see all the dips in task manager-->
Untitled.jpgUntitlemd.jpgUntitlemmmmd.jpg
I feel like disabling security updates is getting to the point where I'm trying to cheat the system or something to try and get slightly higher scores though
 
  • Wow
Reactions: lightmanek

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
14,608
3,586
136
@Junky228

If your system isn't in a mission-critical environment where it might be subject to direct attempts to compromise security, I wouldn't sweat it too much. Main issue is whether or not you use a web browser that's patched against js exploits designed to take advantage of spectre/meltdown. If you are using such a browser, you could probably run with the mitigations disabled all the time and be relatively safe. Probably.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Junky228

Bavor

Member
Nov 11, 2001
73
16
81
I saw the ? for the GHz in my results. I have it set to PBO +200 MHz with the power limits raised. The actual CPU speed varies between 3.9 and 4.2 GHz depending on the load and temperature. Here is a screenshot of Ryzen master for my settings.

 

Hulk

Platinum Member
Oct 9, 1999
2,623
55
91
I saw the ? for the GHz in my results. I have it set to PBO +200 MHz with the power limits raised. The actual CPU speed varies between 3.9 and 4.2 GHz depending on the load and temperature. Here is a screenshot of Ryzen master for my settings.

Just looking for an average speed during the run? 4.05 seem reasonable?
 

Hulk

Platinum Member
Oct 9, 1999
2,623
55
91
RankUserCPUGHzsecondsfps/core/GHzfpsArchitectureCores
1DaPoets3960X 24/484.00
123.66​
0.152​
14.60​
Zen 224
2Micromd2 - Xeon 8260L ES 48/96
2.80​
156.99​
0.086​
11.50​
Cascade Lake48
3Bavor3950x 16/324.05
169.73​
0.164​
10.64​
Zen 216
4KjboughtonE5-2696 2x18 36/72
3.99​
174.06​
0.072​
10.38​
Broadwell36
5DrMrLordX3900x 12/24
4.35​
191.78​
0.180​
9.42​
Zen 212
6KjboughtonE5-2696 2x16 32/32 (no HT)
3.99​
192.66​
0.073​
9.37​
Broadwell32
7DrMrLordX3900x 12/24
4.10​
198.75​
0.185​
9.09​
Zen 212
8rvborghQuad Opteron (48xK10)
3.00​
200​
0.063​
9.03​
Piledriver48
9Cata407840xe 18/36
3.40​
211​
0.140​
8.56​
Skylake18
10Fir2990WX 32/64
4.10​
216.35​
0.064​
8.35​
Zen+32
11Markfw1950x 16/32
3.80​
242.49​
0.122​
7.45​
Zen16
12mrpiggyE5-2699 18/36
3.70​
253.41​
0.107​
7.13​
Haswell18
13eek21211950x 16/32
4.10​
254.04​
0.108​
7.11​
Zen16
14LexingtonianQuad Opteron 6386
3.50​
275.66​
0.029​
6.55​
Piledriver64
15CricketSP9900k 8/16
4.90​
281.8​
0.163​
6.41​
Coffee Lake8
16sdifox3700x 8/16
3.94​
287.06​
0.200​
6.29​
Zen 28
17KenmitchRyzen 7 3700x 8/16
4.20​
290.09​
0.185​
6.23​
Zen 28
18kmm00009900k 8/164.60
290.96​
0.169​
6.21​
Coffee Lake8
19CricketSP9900k 8/16
4.70​
291.87​
0.165​
6.19​
Coffee Lake8
20Makaveli3800x 8/164.90
292.4​
0.158​
6.18​
Zen 28
21KenmitchRyzen 7 3700x 8/16
4.10​
296.72​
0.186​
6.09​
Zen 28
22TillausHamburgXeon ES QL1L 20/40
2.00​
297.54​
0.152​
6.07​
Skylake SP20
23KenmitchRyzen 7 3700x 8/16
3.94​
302.73​
0.189​
5.97​
Zen 28
24sdifox3700x 8/164.00
306.52​
0.184​
5.89​
Zen 28
25Chaotic429700k 8/8
5.00​
311.03​
0.145​
5.81​
Coffee Lake8
26XabanakFanatik5960x 8/16
4.70​
319.84​
0.150​
5.65​
Haswell8
27DooKey7820X 8/16
4.50​
320.75​
0.156​
5.63​
Skylake8
28epsilon 848700K 8/16 (5/4.9)
5.00​
340.42​
0.133​
5.31​
Coffee Lake8
29JoeRambo8700k 8/16 (4.8/4.4)
4.80​
342.38​
0.137​
5.27​
Coffee Lake8
30mjdupuis8700k 8/16 (4.8/4.8)
4.80​
347.5​
0.135​
5.20​
Coffee Lake8
31IEC8700K 8/16 (4.7/4.7)
4.70​
359.41​
0.134​
5.02​
Coffee Lake8
32aclos33600x 6/12
4.04​
367.2​
0.203​
4.92​
Zen 26
33CakeMonster8700k 8/16 (4.9/4.6)
4.90​
379.09​
0.122​
4.76​
Coffee Lake8
34cmdrdredd8700K 8/16 (4.7/4.5)
4.70​
386.65​
0.124​
4.67​
Coffee Lake8
35rgba8700 8/16
4.30​
387.57​
0.135​
4.66​
Coffee Lake8
36MarkfwE5-2696v3 14/28
2.50​
394.29​
0.131​
4.58​
Broadwell14
37Markfw2700x 8/16
4.10​
404.44​
0.136​
4.47​
Zen+8
38Dan057Ryzen 2700 8/164.00
410.08​
0.138​
4.40​
Zen+8
39lightmanekRyzen 7 2700x 8/16
4.00​
414.34​
0.136​
4.36​
Zen+8
40.vodkaRyzen 1700x 8/16
3.95​
416.04​
0.137​
4.34​
Zen8
41pjmssnDual Xeon E5-2690 16/32
2.90​
416.47​
0.093​
4.34​
Sandy Bridge EP16
42Bburninatortech42700x 8/164.00
423.9​
0.133​
4.26​
Zen+8
43Franz3162700x 8/16
3.80​
429.95​
0.138​
4.20​
Zen+8
44.vodkaRyzen 1700x 8/16
3.80​
430.69​
0.138​
4.19​
Zen8
45AnnoyedGruntRyzen 7 2700x 8/16
4.10​
430.94​
0.128​
4.19​
Zen+8
46richaronRyzen 1700 6/12 (Ubuntu 18.04)
3.70​
434.68​
0.187​
4.15​
Zen6
47CrackRabbit2700x 8/16
3.80​
440.29​
0.135​
4.10​
Zen+8
48DespoilerRyzen 1700 6/12
3.90​
444.03​
0.174​
4.07​
Zen6
49dfentonRyzen 1700 6/12
3.70​
476.9​
0.171​
3.79​
Zen6
50XenonRyzen 5 1600AF 6/12
4.00​
504.29​
0.149​
3.58​
Zen+6
51William GaatjesRyzen 2600 6/12 (memory 3200)
3.60​
519.91​
0.161​
3.47​
Zen6
52mjdupuisRyzen 2600x 6/12
4.20​
520.3​
0.138​
3.47​
Zen+6
53ChippyUKi5-8400 6/6
4.00​
558.91​
0.135​
3.23​
Coffee Lake6
54ywasmdi5 8400 6/6
4.00​
562.68​
0.134​
3.21​
Coffee Lake6
55William GaatjesRyzen 2600 6/12 (memory 2933)
3.60​
577.26​
0.145​
3.13​
Zen6
56gamervivekRyzen 1600 6/12
3.50​
593.1​
0.145​
3.05​
Zen6
57CronoReverse4790k 4/8
4.50​
644.52​
0.156​
2.80​
Haswell4
58Hulk4770K 4/8
3.90​
754.96​
0.153​
2.39​
Haswell4
59jones3774770K 4/8
3.90​
768.63​
0.151​
2.35​
Haswell4
60Nathan Gall4770K 4/8
3.90​
775.24​
0.149​
2.33​
Haswell4
61Junky228Xeon w3690 6/12
4.00​
877.63​
0.086​
2.06​
Westmere EP6
62Imported_stryfe2600k 4/8
4.50​
951.72​
0.105​
1.90​
Sandy Bridge4
63Bubbleawsomei5-7300HQ (laptop) 4/4
3.20​
1022.42​
0.138​
1.77​
Kaby Lake4
64Hulk8250u 4/8 (Surface 2 laptop)
2.50​
1067.13​
0.169​
1.69​
Kaby Lake R4
65NickatNight1980FX8320 4/8
4.16​
1117.63​
0.097​
1.62​
Piledriver4
66Xenoni5-1035G4 4/8
2.10​
1126.01​
0.191​
1.60​
Ice Lake4
67Xenoni5-3570k 4/4
4.00​
1206.06​
0.094​
1.50​
Ivy Bridge4
68mylesromi5-3570 4/4
3.80​
1399.56​
0.085​
1.29​
Ivy Bridge4
69dfentoni5-3570s 4/4
3.60​
1586.81​
0.079​
1.14​
Ivy Bridge4
70XenonFX-6300 6/6
4.10​
1657.66​
0.044​
1.09​
Bulldozer6
71Imported_stryfei5-750 4/4
2.80​
2012.8​
0.080​
0.90​
Lynnfield4
72Slim FanPentium Silver J5005 (NUK) 4/4
2.80​
2631.13​
0.061​
0.69​
Goldmont Plus4
73PeterScottCore 2 Quad Q9400 4/4
3.20​
2655.1​
0.053​
0.68​
Yorkfield4
74ywasmdi5 3210 (Macbook Pro) 2/4
3.10​
3144.79​
0.093​
0.57​
Ivy Bridge2
75Fanatical MeatQ9650 4/4
3.00​
3439.2​
0.044​
0.53​
Yorkfield4
76dfentonCeleron N3450 (laptop) 4/4
2.20​
5099.43​
0.040​
0.35​
Apollo Lake4
77dfentonCeleron 2957U 2/2
1.40​
6027.14​
0.107​
0.30​
Haswell2
 

thesmokingman

Platinum Member
May 6, 2010
2,171
93
91
Please check task manager and see what your average speed seems to be when running the test and let me know. I"ll post your score!
That's not an accurate way of showing the clock frequency either. Windows task manager "Speed" is actually very inaccurate when it comes to Zen unless you dumb it down by running an allcore oc. As I type this, task manager is showing 4.2ghz and yet no cores are effectively over 1.5ghz. :rolleyes:

 

Hulk

Platinum Member
Oct 9, 1999
2,623
55
91
@thesmokingman,

That's a really nice utility. If anyone wants to update their average cpu usage using that program just post it and I'll update the chart. You can log CPU usage and see average cpu usage in the log. For my Surface Laptop 2 this utility and task manager showed the same cpu frequency.
 

Kenmitch

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
7,660
758
126
@Hulk

During my 3800 MHz CL15 memory testing I decided to run some encoding tests for stability.

encoded 1806 frames in 284.38s (6.35 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09

Here's what HWINFO64 shows as the true clocks. I reset the data after the run started and snipped it at 99%

clocks.PNG

Overall average for the run would be 3838 MHz while task manager was showing a steady 4.18 GHz.

Don't use task manager to determine the clocks during the run as it's misleading.
 

Muadib

Lifer
May 30, 2000
15,929
220
106
HandBrake 1.1.0 (2018040700) - 64bit
OS: Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.18363.0 - 64bit
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor
Ram: 32696 MB

encoded 1806 frames in 202.15s (8.93 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09
4300.0 Mhz
 

Hulk

Platinum Member
Oct 9, 1999
2,623
55
91
* next to name indicates average clockspeed during test obtained with HWiNFO.
Update 1/26/20

RankUserCPUGHzsecondsfps/core/GHzfpsArchitectureCores
1DaPoets3960X 24/484.00
123.66​
0.152​
14.60​
Zen 224
2Micromd2 - Xeon 8260L ES 48/96
2.80​
156.99​
0.086​
11.50​
Cascade Lake48
3YBS1*3950x 16/32
3.98​
162.41​
0.175​
11.12​
Zen 216
4Bavor3950x 16/324.05
169.73​
0.164​
10.64​
Zen 216
5KjboughtonE5-2696 2x18 36/72
3.99​
174.06​
0.072​
10.38​
Broadwell36
6DrMrLordX3900x 12/24
4.35​
191.78​
0.180​
9.42​
Zen 212
7KjboughtonE5-2696 2x16 32/32 (no HT)
3.99​
192.66​
0.073​
9.37​
Broadwell32
8DrMrLordX3900x 12/24
4.10​
198.75​
0.185​
9.09​
Zen 212
78rvborghQuad Opteron (48xK10)
3.00​
200​
0.063​
9.03​
Piledriver48
9Muadib3900x 12/24
4.30​
202.15​
0.173​
8.93​
Zen 212
10Cata407840xe 18/36
3.40​
211​
0.140​
8.56​
Skylake18
11Fir2990WX 32/64
4.10​
216.35​
0.064​
8.35​
Zen+32
12Markfw1950x 16/32
3.80​
242.49​
0.122​
7.45​
Zen16
13mrpiggyE5-2699 18/36
3.70​
253.41​
0.107​
7.13​
Haswell18
14eek21211950x 16/32
4.10​
254.04​
0.108​
7.11​
Zen16
15RobertR19900k 8/16 (52C/47UC)
5.20​
254.98​
0.170​
7.08​
Coffee Lake8
16LexingtonianQuad Opteron 6386
3.50​
275.66​
0.029​
6.55​
Piledriver64
17CricketSP9900k 8/16
4.90​
281.8​
0.163​
6.41​
Coffee Lake8
18sdifox3700x 8/16
3.94​
287.06​
0.200​
6.29​
Zen 28
19KenmitchRyzen 7 3700x 8/16
4.20​
290.09​
0.185​
6.23​
Zen 28
20kmm00009900k 8/164.60
290.96​
0.169​
6.21​
Coffee Lake8
21CricketSP9900k 8/16
4.70​
291.87​
0.165​
6.19​
Coffee Lake8
22Makaveli3800x 8/164.90
292.4​
0.158​
6.18​
Zen 28
23KenmitchRyzen 7 3700x 8/16
4.10​
296.72​
0.186​
6.09​
Zen 28
24TillausHamburgXeon ES QL1L 20/40
2.00​
297.54​
0.152​
6.07​
Skylake SP20
25Kenmitch*Ryzen 7 3700x 8/16
3.84​
302.73​
0.194​
5.97​
Zen 28
26sdifox3700x 8/164.00
306.52​
0.184​
5.89​
Zen 28
27Chaotic429700k 8/8
5.00​
311.03​
0.145​
5.81​
Coffee Lake8
28XabanakFanatik5960x 8/16
4.70​
319.84​
0.150​
5.65​
Haswell8
29DooKey7820X 8/16
4.50​
320.75​
0.156​
5.63​
Skylake8
30epsilon 848700K 8/16 (5/4.9)
5.00​
340.42​
0.133​
5.31​
Coffee Lake8
31JoeRambo8700k 8/16 (4.8/4.4)
4.80​
342.38​
0.137​
5.27​
Coffee Lake8
32mjdupuis8700k 8/16 (4.8/4.8)
4.80​
347.5​
0.135​
5.20​
Coffee Lake8
33IEC8700K 8/16 (4.7/4.7)
4.70​
359.41​
0.134​
5.02​
Coffee Lake8
34aclos33600x 6/12
4.04​
367.2​
0.203​
4.92​
Zen 26
35CakeMonster8700k 8/16 (4.9/4.6)
4.90​
379.09​
0.122​
4.76​
Coffee Lake8
36cmdrdredd8700K 8/16 (4.7/4.5)
4.70​
386.65​
0.124​
4.67​
Coffee Lake8
37rgba8700 8/16
4.30​
387.57​
0.135​
4.66​
Coffee Lake8
38MarkfwE5-2696v3 14/28
2.50​
394.29​
0.131​
4.58​
Broadwell14
39Markfw2700x 8/16
4.10​
404.44​
0.136​
4.47​
Zen+8
40Dan057Ryzen 2700 8/164.00
410.08​
0.138​
4.40​
Zen+8
41lightmanekRyzen 7 2700x 8/16
4.00​
414.34​
0.136​
4.36​
Zen+8
42.vodkaRyzen 1700x 8/16
3.95​
416.04​
0.137​
4.34​
Zen8
43pjmssnDual Xeon E5-2690 16/32
2.90​
416.47​
0.093​
4.34​
Sandy Bridge EP16
44Bburninatortech42700x 8/164.00
423.9​
0.133​
4.26​
Zen+8
45Franz3162700x 8/16
3.80​
429.95​
0.138​
4.20​
Zen+8
46.vodkaRyzen 1700x 8/16
3.80​
430.69​
0.138​
4.19​
Zen8
47AnnoyedGruntRyzen 7 2700x 8/16
4.10​
430.94​
0.128​
4.19​
Zen+8
48richaronRyzen 1700 6/12 (Ubuntu 18.04)
3.70​
434.68​
0.187​
4.15​
Zen6
49CrackRabbit2700x 8/16
3.80​
440.29​
0.135​
4.10​
Zen+8
50DespoilerRyzen 1700 6/12
3.90​
444.03​
0.174​
4.07​
Zen6
51dfentonRyzen 1700 6/12
3.70​
476.9​
0.171​
3.79​
Zen6
52XenonRyzen 5 1600AF 6/12
4.00​
504.29​
0.149​
3.58​
Zen+6
53William GaatjesRyzen 2600 6/12 (memory 3200)
3.60​
519.91​
0.161​
3.47​
Zen6
54mjdupuisRyzen 2600x 6/12
4.20​
520.3​
0.138​
3.47​
Zen+6
55ChippyUKi5-8400 6/6
4.00​
558.91​
0.135​
3.23​
Coffee Lake6
56ywasmdi5 8400 6/6
4.00​
562.68​
0.134​
3.21​
Coffee Lake6
57William GaatjesRyzen 2600 6/12 (memory 2933)
3.60​
577.26​
0.145​
3.13​
Zen6
58gamervivekRyzen 1600 6/12
3.50​
593.1​
0.145​
3.05​
Zen6
59CronoReverse4790k 4/8
4.50​
644.52​
0.156​
2.80​
Haswell4
60Hulk4770K 4/8
3.90​
754.96​
0.153​
2.39​
Haswell4
61jones3774770K 4/8
3.90​
768.63​
0.151​
2.35​
Haswell4
62Nathan Gall4770K 4/8
3.90​
775.24​
0.149​
2.33​
Haswell4
63Junky228Xeon w3690 6/12
4.00​
877.63​
0.086​
2.06​
Westmere EP6
64Imported_stryfe2600k 4/8
4.50​
951.72​
0.105​
1.90​
Sandy Bridge4
65Bubbleawsomei5-7300HQ (laptop) 4/4
3.20​
1022.42​
0.138​
1.77​
Kaby Lake4
66Hulk8250u 4/8 (Surface 2 laptop)
2.50​
1067.13​
0.169​
1.69​
Kaby Lake R4
67NickatNight1980FX8320 4/8
4.16​
1117.63​
0.097​
1.62​
Piledriver4
68Xenoni5-1035G4 4/8
2.10​
1126.01​
0.191​
1.60​
Ice Lake4
69Xenoni5-3570k 4/4
4.00​
1206.06​
0.094​
1.50​
Ivy Bridge4
70mylesromi5-3570 4/4
3.80​
1399.56​
0.085​
1.29​
Ivy Bridge4
71dfentoni5-3570s 4/4
3.60​
1586.81​
0.079​
1.14​
Ivy Bridge4
72XenonFX-6300 6/6
4.10​
1657.66​
0.044​
1.09​
Bulldozer6
73Imported_stryfei5-750 4/4
2.80​
2012.8​
0.080​
0.90​
Lynnfield4
74Slim FanPentium Silver J5005 (NUK) 4/4
2.80​
2631.13​
0.061​
0.69​
Goldmont Plus4
75PeterScottCore 2 Quad Q9400 4/4
3.20​
2655.1​
0.053​
0.68​
Yorkfield4
76ywasmdi5 3210 (Macbook Pro) 2/4
3.10​
3144.79​
0.093​
0.57​
Ivy Bridge2
77Fanatical MeatQ9650 4/4
3.00​
3439.2​
0.044​
0.53​
Yorkfield4
78dfentonCeleron N3450 (laptop) 4/4
2.20​
5099.43​
0.040​
0.35​
Apollo Lake4
79dfentonCeleron 2957U 2/2
1.40​
6027.14​
0.107​
0.30​
Haswell2
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Drazick

mopardude87

Golden Member
Oct 22, 2018
1,005
298
96
Not sure if my results are even valid but i got the following

i5 8400t
16gb 2666 crucial cl 16

Was running pretty well then like 14 seconds before i could finish i got a nice error.Has happened twice to me at the exact moment but at the 14 second till finish point i was hitting 2.8fps while lowest number was 2.4 during the run. Not gonna bother troubleshooting it as i don't encode normally. I wanted to see where the 8400t landed. Nice to see chart wise its hitting 4790k 4.5ghz numbers while sitting under 48cel passively cooled on the hottest core.

The 8400t eventually is landing into a htpc but for the moment its my primary chip. Oh for those curious the 8400t boosts to 3ghz on all cores during heavy loads. Got it cheap and figured it would be fun to toy with.
 
Last edited:

RobertR1

Golden Member
Oct 22, 2004
1,113
1
76
encoded 1806 frames in 254.98s (7.08 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09

9900k 52core 47uncore
bdie tuned at 17/4200 1T with tight secondary and tertiary timings
z390 apex
Daily stable config

1579969345762.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: lightmanek

YBS1

Golden Member
May 14, 2000
1,897
52
91
3950X in sig,
encoded 1806 frames in 163.24s (11.06 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09
Average clockspeed during the encode bounced around all over the place usually between 3.5 and 3.9GHz I'd say.

Ran it again using the average effective clockspeed monitoring app linked to above, looks like it's about 3.975Ghz overall and ended up with the below result.
encoded 1806 frames in 162.41s (11.12 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: lightmanek

Charlie22911

Senior member
Mar 19, 2005
579
221
116
@sdifox Thanks for mirroring the video!

encoded 1806 frames in 141.12s (12.80 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09
Using 24/7 stable settings:
CPU: Direct die custom water cooled Intel i9 7980XE @ 4.8GHz 1.265v with no AVX2 offset (-2 AVX 512)
RAM: 64GB G.Skill 2800MHz DDR4 generic (holdover, G.Skill Trident Z 3200MHz CL14 is in storage)

Fun note: CPU package power peaked at 400W during this run, poor intel!
 

Attachments

  • Wow
Reactions: lightmanek

Hulk

Platinum Member
Oct 9, 1999
2,623
55
91
@sdifox Thanks for mirroring the video!



Using 24/7 stable settings:
CPU: Direct die custom water cooled Intel i9 7980XE @ 4.8GHz 1.265v with no AVX2 offset (-2 AVX 512)
RAM: 64GB G.Skill 2800MHz DDR4 generic (holdover, G.Skill Trident Z 3200MHz CL14 is in storage)

Fun note: CPU package power peaked at 400W during this run, poor intel!
I'm not sure when you started and stopped HWiNFO? I would say start Handbrake, then click the "clock" (reset) on HWiNFO. Finally just as Handbrake finishes grab the screen capture so the average CPU frequency reported were during the Handbrake run.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
78,378
6,627
126
@sdifox Thanks for mirroring the video!



Using 24/7 stable settings:
CPU: Direct die custom water cooled Intel i9 7980XE @ 4.8GHz 1.265v with no AVX2 offset (-2 AVX 512)
RAM: 64GB G.Skill 2800MHz DDR4 generic (holdover, G.Skill Trident Z 3200MHz CL14 is in storage)

Fun note: CPU package power peaked at 400W during this run, poor intel!

Lol 400W. No melting plastic smell?
 

Kenmitch

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
7,660
758
126
@Hulk you have me in the chart a couple of times. You can delete them and just include my results below.

Clocks were verified with HWiNFO and are a average of all the cores.

3.81 GHz
encoded 1806 frames in 292.34s (6.18 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09

3.97 GHz average of all cores verified with HWiNFO
encoded 1806 frames in 279.43s (6.46 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09
 

Charlie22911

Senior member
Mar 19, 2005
579
221
116
I'm not sure when you started and stopped HWiNFO? I would say start Handbrake, then click the "clock" (reset) on HWiNFO. Finally just as Handbrake finishes grab the screen capture so the average CPU frequency reported were during the Handbrake run.
Ran again, timed HWiNFO as requested:
encoded 1806 frames in 140.33s (12.87 fps), 11820.04 kb/s, Avg QP:29.09
Lol 400W. No melting plastic smell?
No, but I swear I heard mother nature groan in disgust :p
 

Attachments

Fir

Senior member
Jan 15, 2010
456
168
116
HandBrake 1.3.0 (2019110900)
OS: Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.18362.0
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core Processor
Ram: 130940 MB,
GPU Information:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X - 26.21.14.4187
Screen: 4096x2160

[08:40:40] work: average encoding speed for job is 16.193584 fps
[08:40:40] comb detect: heavy 1091 | light 277 | uncombed 438 | total 1806
[08:40:40] decomb: deinterlaced 1091 | blended 277 | unfiltered 438 | total 1806
[08:40:40] vfr: 1806 frames output, 0 dropped and 0 duped for CFR/PFR
[08:40:40] vfr: lost time: 0 (0 frames)
[08:40:40] vfr: gained time: 0 (0 frames) (0 not accounted for)
[08:40:40] aac-decoder done: 3384 frames, 0 decoder errors
[08:40:40] hevc-decoder done: 1806 frames, 0 decoder errors
[08:40:41] sync: got 1806 frames, 1803 expected
[08:40:41] sync: framerate min 25.000 fps, max 25.000 fps, avg 25.000 fps
x265 [info]: frame I: 20, Avg QP:22.97 kb/s: 102715.84
x265 [info]: frame P: 426, Avg QP:23.95 kb/s: 42367.50
x265 [info]: frame B: 1360, Avg QP:30.15 kb/s: 6844.56
x265 [info]: Weighted P-Frames: Y:15.7% UV:11.0%
x265 [info]: consecutive B-frames: 9.6% 1.8% 7.6% 35.9% 45.1%
encoded 1806 frames in 113.33s (15.94 fps), 16285.42 kb/s, Avg QP:28.61
[08:40:41] mux: track 0, 1806 frames, 147064585 bytes, 16277.21 kbps, fifo 512
[08:40:41] mux: track 1, 3385 frames, 1365514 bytes, 151.14 kbps, fifo 1024
[08:40:41] Finished work at: Thu Jan 30 08:40:41 2020
 

Hitman928

Platinum Member
Apr 15, 2012
2,283
1,183
136
HandBrake 1.3.0 (2019110900)
OS: Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.18362.0
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core Processor
Ram: 130940 MB,
GPU Information:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X - 26.21.14.4187
Screen: 4096x2160

[08:40:40] work: average encoding speed for job is 16.193584 fps
[08:40:40] comb detect: heavy 1091 | light 277 | uncombed 438 | total 1806
[08:40:40] decomb: deinterlaced 1091 | blended 277 | unfiltered 438 | total 1806
[08:40:40] vfr: 1806 frames output, 0 dropped and 0 duped for CFR/PFR
[08:40:40] vfr: lost time: 0 (0 frames)
[08:40:40] vfr: gained time: 0 (0 frames) (0 not accounted for)
[08:40:40] aac-decoder done: 3384 frames, 0 decoder errors
[08:40:40] hevc-decoder done: 1806 frames, 0 decoder errors
[08:40:41] sync: got 1806 frames, 1803 expected
[08:40:41] sync: framerate min 25.000 fps, max 25.000 fps, avg 25.000 fps
x265 [info]: frame I: 20, Avg QP:22.97 kb/s: 102715.84
x265 [info]: frame P: 426, Avg QP:23.95 kb/s: 42367.50
x265 [info]: frame B: 1360, Avg QP:30.15 kb/s: 6844.56
x265 [info]: Weighted P-Frames: Y:15.7% UV:11.0%
x265 [info]: consecutive B-frames: 9.6% 1.8% 7.6% 35.9% 45.1%
encoded 1806 frames in 113.33s (15.94 fps), 16285.42 kb/s, Avg QP:28.61
[08:40:41] mux: track 0, 1806 frames, 147064585 bytes, 16277.21 kbps, fifo 512
[08:40:41] mux: track 1, 3385 frames, 1365514 bytes, 151.14 kbps, fifo 1024
[08:40:41] Finished work at: Thu Jan 30 08:40:41 2020
Do you know what frequency your CPU was at during the run?
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY