Whether he's up for a debate with Dr. Paul or Dr. Woods, I don't know.
He has very recently made 2 huge errors when talking about the Fed and money. The first one was when he said the gold standard worked particularly poorly after WWI. That's not a good argument against the gold standard because it was a phony gold standard with a central bank. Monometallism (where the government collects its revenues exclusively in gold or exclusively in silver to store in and disperse out of a common public treasury) with nothing prohibited from circulating by weight is the only true hard money standard. When all the gold is centralized in a central bank with certificates being printed out, then it doesn't work. Congress can devalue it at any time as they did many times during WWI. Bimetallism doesn't work either because then everyone runs into Gresham's Law. A certain amount of gold cannot be arbitrarily defined as a certain amount of silver.
Then he made a non sequitur by saying not having a central bank and being on hard money exposes us to the monetary policies of other countries.
He may be bright, but economics does not seem to be his field, at least so far.
Link
He has very recently made 2 huge errors when talking about the Fed and money. The first one was when he said the gold standard worked particularly poorly after WWI. That's not a good argument against the gold standard because it was a phony gold standard with a central bank. Monometallism (where the government collects its revenues exclusively in gold or exclusively in silver to store in and disperse out of a common public treasury) with nothing prohibited from circulating by weight is the only true hard money standard. When all the gold is centralized in a central bank with certificates being printed out, then it doesn't work. Congress can devalue it at any time as they did many times during WWI. Bimetallism doesn't work either because then everyone runs into Gresham's Law. A certain amount of gold cannot be arbitrarily defined as a certain amount of silver.
Then he made a non sequitur by saying not having a central bank and being on hard money exposes us to the monetary policies of other countries.
He may be bright, but economics does not seem to be his field, at least so far.
Link