Originally posted by: joshw10
When ordering a belt (for pants) is the specified size supposed to be the smallest you can wear it, largest you can wear it, or like the middle hole? If i wear a 32 pants should i get a 32 belt
Originally posted by: TheNinja
Originally posted by: joshw10
When ordering a belt (for pants) is the specified size supposed to be the smallest you can wear it, largest you can wear it, or like the middle hole? If i wear a 32 pants should i get a 32 belt
For dress pants I'd probably get a 34 belt in your case....For "homie" pants, get a 52 belt.
Originally posted by: Mrvile
Originally posted by: TheNinja
Originally posted by: joshw10
When ordering a belt (for pants) is the specified size supposed to be the smallest you can wear it, largest you can wear it, or like the middle hole? If i wear a 32 pants should i get a 32 belt
For dress pants I'd probably get a 34 belt in your case....For "homie" pants, get a 52 belt.
...homie pants...
Originally posted by: joshw10
When ordering a belt (for pants) is the specified size supposed to be the smallest you can wear it, largest you can wear it, or like the middle hole? If i wear a 32 pants should i get a 32 belt
Originally posted by: scorpmatt
Originally posted by: Mrvile
Originally posted by: TheNinja
Originally posted by: joshw10
When ordering a belt (for pants) is the specified size supposed to be the smallest you can wear it, largest you can wear it, or like the middle hole? If i wear a 32 pants should i get a 32 belt
For dress pants I'd probably get a 34 belt in your case....For "homie" pants, get a 52 belt.
...homie pants...
the only time I see those guys move fast is when someone tries to yank their pants down as the are walking, or standing around. ah, highschool, how I don't miss everything