Beloved Black Principal Fired in Ludicrous Critical Race Theory Spat

[HomerJS]

James Whitfield during the summer of 2020 during the height of awareness concerning the murders of George Floyd, Ahmed Arbury and Breonna Taylor he penned a letter to the community that said the following...

At 4:30 a.m., he wrote a letter to the school community declaring that systemic racism is “alive and well” and that they needed to work together to achieve “conciliation for our nation.” “Education is the key to stomping out ignorance, hate, and systemic racism,” Whitfield wrote. “It’s a necessary conduit to get ‘liberty and justice for all.’”

At that time his letter had nothing but positive responses. Fast forward one year later At a July 26 Grapevine-Colleyville ISD school board meeting, Stetson Clark, a former school board candidate at Grapevine-Colleyville ISD, would use the letter to accuse Whitfield of teaching and promoting “critical race theory.” That's all it took now all the aggrieved white people who have been brainwashed that CRT is the new evil like Sharia Law and Colin Kapernick started shouting and demanding his firing at school board meetings. He was suspended and now his contract is not being renewed.

I guess I should give credit to oppressed white people they do exactly what they are told by the right wing machine and now a well respected principal is being pushed out because of the very racism he wanted to fight against.

Grapevine-Colleyville, Texas School Board Ousts Black Principal James Whitfield Over Critical Race Theory (thedailybeast.com)

 

[pmv]

Clearly the plan is to replace CRT with TFT (theocratic fascist thought)

 

[interchange]

Even for Texas this seems hard to believe to me. Absolutely awful if things are as straightforward as presented.

 

[SmCaudata]

Seems a violation of first amendment rights along with unlawful termination. I'd love to see huge windfalls in lawsuits. Typically I am not a fan of suing the government due to taxpayer burden but I'm all out of fucks to give for the people of Texas given who they chose to elect.

 

[Dulanic]

Seems a violation of first amendment rights along with unlawful termination. I'd love to see huge windfalls in lawsuits. Typically I am not a fan of suing the government due to taxpayer burden but I'm all out of fucks to give for the people of Texas given who they chose to elect.

You underestimate the insanity that exists here. I could probably throw a stone to Grapevine which is part of Colleyville ISD, I am by no means surprised. It's just on another side of the lake as Southlake, one of the richest cities in Texas. It is mighty white /w some Asian sprinkles. They play the poor white person card very well. I'm surprised they haven't banned blacks from holding public jobs in this state yet, I'm sure it would hold up /w todays SCOTUS.

This is the real reason they want him gone, he mixes with their kind! How dare he!

 

[Jaskalas]

Did the cowards on the board give no cause? No reason?
That they would not stand for a man who is falsely accused speaks volumes.

 

[pauldun170]

You underestimate the insanity that exists here. I could probably throw a stone to Grapevine which is part of Colleyville ISD, I am by no means surprised. It's just on another side of the lake as Southlake, one of the richest cities in Texas. It is mighty white /w some Asian sprinkles. They play the poor white person card very well. I'm surprised they haven't banned blacks from holding public jobs in this state yet, I'm sure it would hold up /w todays SCOTUS.

This is the real reason they want him gone, he mixes with their kind! How dare he!

You may find this story relevant

Principal Speaks Out After School District Brands His Anniversary Pic with Wife 'Questionable'

Colleyville Heritage High School Principal, Dr. James Whitfield, said the photos were taken for their anniversary

people.com

 

[Dulanic]

You may find this story relevant

Principal Speaks Out After School District Brands His Anniversary Pic with Wife 'Questionable'

Colleyville Heritage High School Principal, Dr. James Whitfield, said the photos were taken for their anniversary

people.com

Yeah I've seen it, thanks though. How dare he have pictures on Facebook of his anniversary in Mexico right? They act like he posted pictured of him fucking his wife on the beach .

 

[Hail The Brain Slug]

Yeah I've seen it, thanks though. How dare he have pictures on Facebook of his anniversary in Mexico right? They act like he posted pictured of him fucking his wife on the beach .

Maybe that version of the album is on his OnlyFans?

 

[HomerJS]

Did the cowards on the board give no cause? No reason?
That they would not stand for a man who is falsely accused speaks volumes.

They claimed it wasn't race or the hoards of white people who want him fired. Board is claiming "performance problems"

Principal says it's not true. I believe him. No issues with him until that fateful school board meeting and they pulled out his letter to the community from a year ago.

 

[HomerJS]

Yeah I've seen it, thanks though. How dare he have pictures on Facebook of his anniversary in Mexico right? They act like he posted pictured of him fucking his wife on the beach .

We all know what is "questionable"

 

[mect]

It continues to amaze me how conservatives maintain that there is no more systematic racism in America and then put out case studies for all the world to see.

 

[K1052]

Anti-CRT stuff is just the latest vehicle for racists to attack black people while trying not to appear horrifyingly racist.

 

[SmCaudata]

If they cite performance problems, then they should have those on file. Easy enough for the principal to refute.

 

[SmCaudata]

Anti-CRT stuff is just the latest vehicle for racists to attack black people while trying not to appear horrifyingly racist.

Not even anti CRT. That's just a cover for government sponsored whitewashing of history.

 

[maluckey1]

Already a thread on this. Don't be a black principle in racist Texas | AnandTech Forums: Technology, Hardware, Software, and Deals

A statement by the school:

"THE DECISION TO PUT DR WHITFIELD ON ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE WAS NOT THE RESULT OF STATEMENTS MADE BY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, INCLUDING THOSE WHO SPOKE AT RECENT GCISD BOARD MEETINGS. THE DECISION WAS ALSO NOT MADE IN RESPONSE TO CLAIMS THAT DR WHITFIELD WAS TEACHING CRITICAL RACE THEORY, OR BECAUSE OF PHOTOS ON HIS SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNT THAT CAME TO THE ATTENTION OF THE DISTRICT IN 2019."

Because lawyers are involved, the school board will not likely add further comment. We'll have to wait and see, or just make ourselves the judge jury and executioner (the normal thing to do on AT P&N). About as much accountability as politicians with the muckraking, and if it all wasn't so damned entertaining (at times) I'd be sad though.

 

[mect]

Already a thread on this. Don't be a black principle in racist Texas | AnandTech Forums: Technology, Hardware, Software, and Deals

A statement by the school:

"THE DECISION TO PUT DR WHITFIELD ON ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE WAS NOT THE RESULT OF STATEMENTS MADE BY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, INCLUDING THOSE WHO SPOKE AT RECENT GCISD BOARD MEETINGS. THE DECISION WAS ALSO NOT MADE IN RESPONSE TO CLAIMS THAT DR WHITFIELD WAS TEACHING CRITICAL RACE THEORY, OR BECAUSE OF PHOTOS ON HIS SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNT THAT CAME TO THE ATTENTION OF THE DISTRICT IN 2019."

Because lawyers are involved, the school board will not likely add further comment. We'll have to wait and see, or just make ourselves the judge jury and executioner (the normal thing to do on AT P&N). About as much accountability as politicians with the muckraking, and if it all wasn't so damned entertaining (at times) I'd be sad though.

Wait, so you are saying the school isn't admitting that it fired him because he's black and involved in a mixed race marriage? Well, we should all just move along then, nothing to see here.

 

[HomerJS]

They can't just get rid of him because he married a white woman. This CRT bullshit gives them cover.

Nice to see students are supporting him
Parents, students support embattled Grapevine-area principal | wfaa.com
Students stage walkout in support of Texas principal suspended over suspected support of critical race theory - Alternet.org

 

[nakedfrog]

Courteous of them to prove he was right, I guess?

 

[interchange]

Already a thread on this. Don't be a black principle in racist Texas | AnandTech Forums: Technology, Hardware, Software, and Deals

A statement by the school:

"THE DECISION TO PUT DR WHITFIELD ON ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE WAS NOT THE RESULT OF STATEMENTS MADE BY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, INCLUDING THOSE WHO SPOKE AT RECENT GCISD BOARD MEETINGS. THE DECISION WAS ALSO NOT MADE IN RESPONSE TO CLAIMS THAT DR WHITFIELD WAS TEACHING CRITICAL RACE THEORY, OR BECAUSE OF PHOTOS ON HIS SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNT THAT CAME TO THE ATTENTION OF THE DISTRICT IN 2019."

Because lawyers are involved, the school board will not likely add further comment. We'll have to wait and see, or just make ourselves the judge jury and executioner (the normal thing to do on AT P&N). About as much accountability as politicians with the muckraking, and if it all wasn't so damned entertaining (at times) I'd be sad though.

Then the decision was made based on...? Something? Not providing a reason for termination is extremely troubling.

I see looking it up that Texas follows the at will employment doctrine. I'm not sure if he has any extra protection as a government employee (county level?). Of course it is illegal federally if he can demonstrate he was fired because of race. The school board may not need any justification at all, but not providing one given the circumstances is highly suspicious for discrimination.

 

[MrSquished]

Listen the white MAGATS firing this guy, they aren't racist, they are OPPRESSED WHITE PEOPLE!

 

[woolfe9998]

Then the decision was made based on...? Something? Not providing a reason for termination is extremely troubling.

I see looking it up that Texas follows the at will employment doctrine. I'm not sure if he has any extra protection as a government employee (county level?). Of course it is illegal federally if he can demonstrate he was fired because of race. The school board may not need any justification at all, but not providing one given the circumstances is highly suspicious for discrimination.

They did give some reasons not mentioned in the article.

During Monday’s meeting, a district official elaborated on the reasons behind the recommendation to end the principal’s contract. She pointed to allegations that Whitfield had “deficiencies in communication” in emails and conversations with colleagues. She also accused Whitfield of “insubordination,” “being dishonest with the media” and failing to formally report his concerns about racial discrimination following the July 26 board meeting.
“Dr. Whitfield has diminished his effectiveness by dividing large segments of the community,” she said at the lectern during the meeting. The remark led many in the crowd to erupt into jeers and protests. The board president repeatedly pounded his gavel and called for silence.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/09/21/james-whitfield-school-board-vote/

Spot the circular reasoning.

Whitfield is not fired yet. He needs to do the appeal and present his case against termination. Then if he ends up fired, I would get a lawyer and sue under Title VII.

 

[SmCaudata]

They did give some reasons not mentioned in the article.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/09/21/james-whitfield-school-board-vote/

Spot the circular reasoning.

Whitfield is not fired yet. He needs to do the appeal and present his case against termination. Then if he ends up fired, I would get a lawyer and sue under Title VII.

Insubordination, failing to express concerns and dividing the comunity sound like phrases pulled from all the other crazy anti-CRT rhetoric.

 

[woolfe9998]

Insubordination, failing to express concerns and dividing the comunity sound like phrases pulled from all the other crazy anti-CRT rhetoric.

I've read a few articles and each gives a couple bits and pieces of the reasoning they provided at the meeting. One set of reasons given (poor communication with staff, deficient employee evaluations) sound like the sorts of things you do not fire a relatively new principal over. Even if true, the usual way to handle them would be to put the principal on notice and try to work with him to improve.

The second set is the circular part. "We're not firing him over CRT. We're firing him over saying we were firing him over CRT."

While the second set is logically absurd, the first set sounds pretextual to me. Like the kinds of things you put together after the fact to justify firing someone for an impermissible reason. An inference I think a jury would be entitled to make.

 

[maluckey1]

I've read a few articles and each gives a couple bits and pieces of the reasoning they provided at the meeting. One set of reasons given (poor communication with staff, deficient employee evaluations) sound like the sorts of things you do not fire a relatively new principal over. Even if true, the usual way to handle them would be to put the principal on notice and try to work with him to improve.

The second set is the circular part. "We're not firing him over CRT. We're firing him over saying we were firing him over CRT."

While the second set is logically absurd, the first set sounds pretextual to me. Like the kinds of things you put together after the fact to justify firing someone for an impermissible reason. An inference I think a jury would be entitled to make.

It does sound like they were already looking for an excuse for termination. As more information comes out, we may find more to the story.

Something to consider is that failure to inform management (or HR) of discrimination (or other wrongdoing) is grounds for discipline, up to termination in many companies, and for all state/federal federal employees. His stated lack of good communication coupled with sub-standard rating of his direct employees tells us something wasn't all well-managed at the workplace. Did the school board or superintendent already put an action plan (always following a notice of intent to not-renew if standards weren't met) into place?

Then the decision was made based on...? Something? Not providing a reason for termination is extremely troubling.

I see looking it up that Texas follows the at will employment doctrine. I'm not sure if he has any extra protection as a government employee (county level?). Of course it is illegal federally if he can demonstrate he was fired because of race. The school board may not need any justification at all, but not providing one given the circumstances is highly suspicious for discrimination.

I could hypothetically say that the board may have wanted to not renew his contract (from what the board said, are several smaller issues that add up to a bigger one) , and Whitfield went straight to "racism" as a cause. I could just as easily say the board was racist and hated him from the start...but then why hire him in the first place?