being born a white male

Chiropteran

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2003
9,811
110
106
300 years ago...

A white male was born with huge advantages. He never had to do any physical work, there were always slaves or servants to do those sorts of things. Never have to do his own cooking. Never had to worry about being stuck in the cold or without shelter.

Effectively, he had a very strong vote, because so many other people were simply denied the right to vote. Compared to a non-white male, almost always came out ahead in court or in business.

By virtue of race and rights granted due to race, simply had a longer life expectancy and better general health.

And most important, he passed down these benefits to his children.


I think nearly anyone you could ask would agree that that was a terrible unfair situation. Now, 300 years later, has anything at all changed? Replace race with money, and you find that things really haven't changed.

The rich don't need to work, cook their own meals, or ever fear lack of shelter or warmth.

The rich effectively have a huge stranglehold on our government, through paid lobbyists and even pocket politicians. With money, the court system is a joke, as only those who can afford the best lawyers get a truly adequate defense.

By virtue of having money, medical care and unforeseen medical expenses aren't always devastating, and diseases that are a death sentence to the poor are a mere annoyance (see: Magic Johnson and Aids).


Being rich isn't a sign of success, it's a sign of an imbalance in the system. It's unfair and broken, and the justifications for it are the same justifications used 300 years ago to explain why whites deserved more rights than blacks.

It's time to increase the tax burden of the super-wealthy.
 

Agent11

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2006
3,535
1
0
There are plenty of poor and middle class white people. More than there are rich white people. *And were 300 years ago as well*.
 
Last edited:

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
You have a misguided idea of what life was like for a typical white male 300 years ago and today.
 

ichy

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2006
6,940
8
81
White males born 300 years ago didn't have to do any physical work? You are an idiot and I hate you.
 

corwin

Diamond Member
Jan 13, 2006
8,644
9
81
Being rich isn't a sign of success, it's a sign of an imbalance in the system. It's unfair and broken, and the justifications for it are the same justifications used 300 years ago to explain why whites deserved more rights than blacks.
So 300 years ago they argued whites deserved more rights than blacks because they worked for and earned it?

Whatever you're smoking you need to stop...just put the pipe down and stop....
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,398
8,568
126
300 years ago...

A white male was born with huge advantages. He never had to do any physical work, there were always slaves or servants to do those sorts of things. Never have to do his own cooking. Never had to worry about being stuck in the cold or without shelter.

i disagree with your premise.



Fine. What do we do when there is no more super-wealthy? Increase it on the plain old wealthy?
yes because there were no super wealthy people under the clinton tax regime.
 

Agent11

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2006
3,535
1
0
The rich have always had power, to varying degrees. It is not a modern phenomena.
 

nextJin

Golden Member
Apr 16, 2009
1,848
0
0
This is probably one of the worst threads I have read in quite some time including 420s daily ramblings.

EDIT: And your in Arlington? By chance were you near the Walmart on Rt 1 about a week or so ago around midnight?
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,647
9,953
136
It's time to increase the tax burden of the super-wealthy.

Tax them at 100%, I bet you it still won't pay for Obamacare, let alone anything else you plan on doing.

You want to eat the rich, cause there's this money tree in their back yard. Wait til you get a hold of it... When reality meets delusions of grandeur. Only by then you will have riled up the mob, hungry for money or blood. It'll be you they feast on after they burn this place to the ground.
 

Vic Vega

Diamond Member
Sep 24, 2010
4,535
4
0
300 years ago...

A white male was born with huge advantages. He never had to do any physical work, there were always slaves or servants to do those sorts of things. Never have to do his own cooking. Never had to worry about being stuck in the cold or without shelter.

You are fucking stupid.
 

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,994
779
126
Actually the super rich really don't have to work all that much. Back in 2007, the average effective tax rate of the top 400 income earners was something ludicrous like 16%. That's mostly due to passive income from capital gains taxes. So you and i are basically working our assess off to make them rich AND we pay higher taxes than they do, to add salt to the wound.
 

squirrel dog

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
5,564
48
91
My Irish ancestors 300 years ago did not have slaves I can assure you.They worked with their hands from can to can't.Only a naive fool would make such an assumption.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
My Irish ancestors 300 years ago did not have slaves I can assure you.They worked with their hands from can to can't.Only a naive fool would make such an assumption.

You are fucking stupid.

LOL wat? Please tell me you're trolling....

Btw I'm a white male.

So 300 years ago they argued whites deserved more rights than blacks because they worked for and earned it?

Whatever you're smoking you need to stop...just put the pipe down and stop....

White males born 300 years ago didn't have to do any physical work? You are an idiot and I hate you.



bwhahahahh i think pretty much everything that really needed to be said was said.
 

Steeplerot

Lifer
Mar 29, 2004
13,051
6
81
Fine. What do we do when there is no more super-wealthy?


The super wealthy are parasites who live off of the workers labor. There is no need for them.


They produce nothing but hoarding, and sow divisive class/religious/race warfare to play the working classes off of one another for their own benefit.


The more super rich you have living off the masses, the more poverty/misery the majority live in.

It's all about who has the power to buy the media and politicians and frame the debate.

This is why people laugh their asses off when righties say the government panders to the poor.

Why in reality would someone pander to folks with no political power? This is propaganda fed to you by the elite parasite class taking you for a ride.

Sometimes people just have no sense of their own best interests and fall for it.

Pretty sad state of the working class in the USA.

To keep the super rich from having nothing else to do with all that money but subvert a society with all that pointless wealth -to get more just because they can- is make them actually have to take RISKS and be personally accountable for their actions.

This promotes innovation instead of the inevitable plutocracy and corruption time and time again that drives a society/democracy into dysfunction.

Sooner or later the plebes will get sick of the "let them eat cake" BS and eat the rich themselves.

The history of human civilization shows this time and time again.

Paris Hilton and even our own Aristocrat420 are great examples of how useless/arrogant the rich are.

A damn shame, what money does to people, literally economic thugs, the sad part is they have almost no vision with all that entitlement and lack of struggle to show for their lifetimes.
 
Last edited:

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
25,944
12,215
136
This is probably one of the worst threads I have read in quite some time including 420s daily ramblings.

EDIT: And your in Arlington? By chance were you near the Walmart on Rt 1 about a week or so ago around midnight?

I think the poster and 420 met on the corner of Lee Hwy and Sycamore street for an exchange of ideas. (Near Tuckahoe Elementary, my old elementary school).

:p
 

Steeplerot

Lifer
Mar 29, 2004
13,051
6
81
So you and i are basically working our assess off to make them rich AND we pay higher taxes than they do, to add salt to the wound.

This is why they invest so much into "economic freedom" think tank talking points and class warfare spewing mouthpieces like Foxnews.

The status quo is working out very well for the super wealthy.

Actual Un-PC talk like this totally messes up their game.

It's blasphemy of the highest order, to speak out against our capitalist lords we owe everything to, now back to work, and work harder while you are at it serf! ;)

To right wingers that warm trickle down on their foreheads is holy water of the blessed. To the rest of us looking up we see it for what it is, a giant lavish party of arrogant entitled jerks up high pissing onto our foreheads.

Right wingers are weird folks, I don't mind kinkiness or whatever you are into in private, but keep it in the bedroom -and out of economics that affect real working people.

Remember rule # 1:

images


The working classes of the USA are getting our asses KICKED. When is the bourgeoisie so-called left in this country going to grow a pair and actually do something besides "were all in this together" populist mind numbing pap that only serves to keep up apathy and maintain the status quo? Just like the elites want.

History is being written daily.
 
Last edited:

Atreus21

Lifer
Aug 21, 2007
12,001
571
126
Remarkable.

It's only racism if the target is poor, apparently. There's nothing wrong with making blanket statements against whole ethnic groups, as long as it's one in particular.
 

Howard

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
47,982
11
81
This is the stupidest post I've seen in a while and I've seen a lot of stupid posts this past while.
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
The rich are like everyone else. Some of them work hard. Some of them are very generous. Some of them are lazy. And plenty of them are douchebags.