Bear Stern stock

[LuckyTaxi]

It's now trading @ $13, and i should've picked up a few thousand shares @ $2!

 

[GT1999]

Hindsight is always 20/20, especially w/ stocks. :brokenheart:

 

[imported_Lothar]

I'm not.

 

[Ns1]

I am.




But then again, I'm still down 66% from when I bought em.

 

[darkxshade]

you better buy a few thousand shares now before you say you should've bought it today when JPM says they've decided to pay $20/share next month. Then again if you do that, they'll probably tell investors they've deicded to pay $2/share afterall.

 

[Aharami]

wish I had a time machine!

 

[Miramonti]

It was never at $2, and was only <$3 for about 60 seconds.

 

[Miramonti]

n/m

 

[JeffreyLebowski]

Originally posted by: darkxshade
you better buy a few thousand shares now before you say you should've bought it today when JPM says they've decided to pay $20/share next month. Then again if you do that, they'll probably tell investors they've deicded to pay $2/share afterall.

They're just waiting for JP Morgan senior VP's to move all their funds into Bear Sterns stock before JP buys it at $20/share to give their VP's a bonus off the books.

 

[jfall]

And if you bought at $2 and it went down to $1 you'd be saying the complete opposite. There is no sense in worrying about it

 

[EKKC]

yeah people are still kicking themselves for buying at $100. $60, and $30
$12 is a lot if u got in last week at $4-$6, but to those shareholders who been holding it for long term gain, they're still royally screwed by this JPMorgan deal.

 

[Slick5150]

It never traded at $2/share. So your point is moot