BBC: North Korea has canceled high level talks with South Korea

jana519

Senior member
Jul 12, 2014
782
100
106
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-44133308

North Korea has cancelled Wednesday's high-level talks with South Korea because of anger over its joint military exercises with the US.

The North's official KCNA news agency said the exercises were a "provocation" and a rehearsal for an invasion

Looks like Kim got his legitimacy from Pompeo with his photo op, now that he feels he's on equal ground he will try to throw his weight around and push for more concessions. Was it ever a good idea to give the North Korean regime legitimacy in return for nothing but promises?

Reportedly Kim is threatening to pull out of the June summit with the US as well: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...atens-cancel-trump-kim-meet-article-1.3991398
 
Last edited:

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,688
4,795
136
But Trump is still "dominating", right?

...Right?

He's not?

sad-pepe-the-frog-3d-model-obj.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meghan54 and Amused

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
It was Obama's idea to talk with the bad guys :D

Gawd. It was Trump who gave up US credibility when he renounced the Iran deal. Before that it was Bush who scuttled Clinton's deal w/ N Korea claiming that they admitted to having nukes at the time, a preposterous proposition. Even if they did they wouldn't have admitted it.

Now, of course, Iran is free to sell NK all the oil they care to purchase.

Meanwhile, Israel has been creating nukes for ~50 years.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,267
126
Not a Kim fan but if someone is potentially offering a historical peace it's probably not a good idea to provoke with military exercises.

Just sayin'
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thebobo

Young Grasshopper

Senior member
Nov 9, 2007
975
343
136
Not a Kim fan but if someone is potentially offering a historical peace it's probably not a good idea to provoke with military exercises.

Just sayin'


He’s not offering peace. This is nothing more than an attempt by Kim to make Trump look like the fool that he is on the world stage. He sees what’s a bafoon our president is and is taking advantage of it.
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,688
4,795
136
Not a Kim fan but if someone is potentially offering a historical peace it's probably not a good idea to provoke with military exercises.

Just sayin'


Well, yeah...you are right and all, but we're talking Trump team diplomacy. Or the lack of it.
 

jana519

Senior member
Jul 12, 2014
782
100
106
Not a Kim fan but if someone is potentially offering a historical peace it's probably not a good idea to provoke with military exercises.

Just sayin'

Maybe if there was a properly funded and staffed State Department, someone could have advised Trump on that... ooops.
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
24,294
22,513
136
Not a Kim fan but if someone is potentially offering a historical peace it's probably not a good idea to provoke with military exercises.

Just sayin'

I was thinking the same thing. In reality the Trump team just probably forgot, they were too busy celebrating the 500 million dollar investment by China in a Trump-heavy development.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
86,566
52,285
136
I strongly suspect the talks will still happen. After all they are what the Kims have wanted for decades.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IJTSSG

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,162
136
Are these two guys brothers? Maybe even twins? Or what?
Kim can't be trusted, he (or she, I can't be sure) lies, flip flops, says one thing then does another, AND....
so does Donald Trump the exact same thing.
So class, what lesson have we learned today?
That nutcases can't be trusted.
And, as I have always said when it comes to Trump, nothing is ever as it appears.
His base can be easily fooled, but can YOU?

Who do these guys think they are anyway, DirecTV?
Promising one thing, THEN, delivering something completely different.
And as with DirecTV, we're locked in that damn contract. Four years for Donald Trump.
And, always read the fine print. Early termination fees apply.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thebobo

Puffnstuff

Lifer
Mar 9, 2005
16,180
4,869
136
I'm seeing this story on MSM so I have to wonder what Lil' Kim's angle is on all of this or is someone else to blame?
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
34,418
8,470
136
Was it ever a good idea to give the North Korean regime legitimacy in return for nothing but promises?

North Korea will have legitimacy IF they act in good faith and demonstrate their end of whatever deal there'll be. Otherwise, WTF do you think they've gained?
 

jana519

Senior member
Jul 12, 2014
782
100
106
North Korea will have legitimacy IF they act in good faith and demonstrate their end of whatever deal there'll be. Otherwise, WTF do you think they've gained?

No, they gained legitimacy when Secretary of State Mike Pompeo flew to meet Kim Jong-Un in person for a photo op and announced a US-North Korea summit in June.

Now North Korea has leverage because they can pull out at any time and Trump will look like a diplomatic failure. To be fair, Trump did get 3 American prisoners released. I'm looking at this and thinking North Korea has lost nothing of value and has gained a lot of leverage going into any real talks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bitek

FIVR

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2016
3,753
911
106
LOL I told you guys there would be ZERO Trump Nobel prizes.



He did get those koreans back from best korea. That's definitely a win. Not prize-worthy tho.
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,238
136
I strongly suspect the talks will still happen. After all they are what the Kims have wanted for decades.

IMO, they are testing Trump's desperation to make a deal.

Trump had gone all in on making this NK deal. Probably sees it as his reelection and legacy issue, which gives NK a lot of leverage.

Look how easily Trump folded on ZTE. Who actually trusts this guy to have the nation's best interest over his own.
 

FIVR

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2016
3,753
911
106
US military is never going to give up their huge, expensive, wasteful provocation exercises. They cost billions of dollars that otherwise would go to lame shit like schools and infrastructure. US military can never admit that it doesn't need every last dime in its enormous budget, so these exercises won't be cancelled.


I strongly suspect that Dump was stupid enough to offer Kim Jong Un to stop these exercises but he never checked his derp state generals to see if they would let him do that. So now, we have problems...
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
16,027
14,646
146
What else is there for Kim? Trump made it obvious that no deal with the US can be trusted. Trump's repudiation of the Iran deal tells them that.
Take a look at it from his perspective.

He's now confirmed as a valid world leader, in the sense that the POTUS has invited him to talks. In addition, he's talking with his immediate (and most threatening) neighbor. He now decides to end the talks based on their military posture, he is at this point holding the cards in the negotiations. He's backing off from talks because of the other guys' actions. He can now re-enter negotiations when he feels fit to do so, and he'll be in power at that point.

Ironically this kind of crap is probably in Trump's book, he probably should have read it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FIVR