• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Battlefield bad company 2 question

slick2010 said:
Will I be able to run this game with this system, i understand i wont be able to play at max.

e8500 cpu
4 gb ram@1066
260 gtx
xi fi sound
Click to expand...

Strangely enough the thread with the min and recommended hardware for this game is RIGHT BELOW your thread, and yes, obviously your system will be able to run it.
 
yea you should do good. What res you game at? You should be able to max it, now with how much AA I dunno
 
slick2010 said:
i saw the thread, but i dont usually trust what they say, i get better results with answers from real people
Click to expand...

Well it's hard to do anything but speculate for now since the beta hasn't even started yet, all we really have to go off of are the specs listed by the devs. The fact that the engine is designed for consoles could mean either a) it'll be easy to max out on PC if it's ported well or b)it'll run like crap even though the engine isn't anything special graphically.

I would say you'll be able to set it pretty high, but we should know a lot more about how well it runs by the end of this week after the beta starts.
 
thanks for the help, im just not sure if i have to upgrade to a dual core cpu, the e8500 is a petty good cpu, resolution will probably be 1600 x 900
 
slick2010 said:
thanks for the help, im just not sure if i have to upgrade to a dual core cpu, the e8500 is a petty good cpu, resolution will probably be 1600 x 900
Click to expand...

I think a e8500 would be more than enough for this game. It kind of depends how they do the physics but I imagine that having two cores would be enough. CPU's generally don't matter that much for FPS's since most of the work is done by the GPU, so I could see them putting the normal processes on the first core and physics on the 2nd core or something like that.

1600x900 is a weird res too, what kind of monitor do you have?
 
Originally Posted by slick2010
thanks for the help, im just not sure if i have to upgrade to a dual core cpu, the e8500 is a petty good cpu, resolution will probably be 1600 x 900
e8500 is a dual core... you mean quad?



yes i meant upgrade to a quad,,,,sorry
 
you should be fine. The devs already stated that a higher frequency will preform better than more cores. However they said a high frequency quad is the best. Whats ur 8500 clocked at?
 
Why do you say you 'know you won't be able to run it at max settings'? I have the same system and have every intention of playing on max settings with hopefully 4xAA. Whether it happens or not... we'll see. But any game that runs on the consoles should play very well on a decent pc.
 
Minimum Frostbite PC Specifications for BFBC2:

Processor: Core 2 Duo @ 2.0GHz
Main memory: 2GB
Graphics card: GeForce 7800 GT / ATI X1900
Graphics memory: 256MB
OS: Windows XP
Free HDD space: 15GB for Digital Version, 10GB for Disc Version

Recommended Frostbite PC Specifications for BFBC2:

Processor: Quadcore
Main memory: 2GB
Graphics card: GeForce GTX 260
Graphics memory: 512MB
OS: Windows Vista or Windows 7
Free HDD space: 15GB for Digital Version, 10GB for Disc Version
 
its fine. i have a lesser video card, but will be playing the game anyways. i am gonna try to keep using my 8800gt until bf3.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top