Regs
Lifer
- Aug 9, 2002
- 16,665
- 21
- 81
Medic always get the shaft and I think they play the bigger role in team success. I always end up playing the medic on a squad because its always filled with snipers and support. The guns are great med-range with good accuracy but the reload times and damage are freaking terrible in anything less than a duck for cover situation. Why be a medic with a crap gun, when you play as a scout armed with radar mapping flares and one-shot kill infantry rifle that can fire accurately from 10m-250m?
Automatico's are still insanely OP for most of the tight quarter maps. And there are many maps you can just bull doze with that gun.
Heavy Tanks have no armor.
If you're not taking advantage of the OP or widely unfair advantages the game gives you in classes, then you are likely being aggravated by how horrible the game trys to over-compensate for the WW1 low tech weaponry.
I do believe they tried too hard to make the best out of a game engine meant for Battlefront. It's not my favorite BF game and I do miss Bad Company and Battlefield 4. I still end up playing it for what it is and the competition out there is pretty weak. PUBG might have some merit but is a completely different type of game.
Battlefield 5 or WW2 BF will likely be more of the same because Dice/EA will not give up on Battlefront series and with the two game engines merged as one, we're just going to have to continue to eat it until we vote with our wallets. In business terms, they likely overpaid for the Star Wars usage rights, and are trying to salvage it by making horrible games with hype marketing. So for the President to save face before being voted out by stock holders of EA, he will continue to double down on it until he ready to retire.
Automatico's are still insanely OP for most of the tight quarter maps. And there are many maps you can just bull doze with that gun.
Heavy Tanks have no armor.
If you're not taking advantage of the OP or widely unfair advantages the game gives you in classes, then you are likely being aggravated by how horrible the game trys to over-compensate for the WW1 low tech weaponry.
I do believe they tried too hard to make the best out of a game engine meant for Battlefront. It's not my favorite BF game and I do miss Bad Company and Battlefield 4. I still end up playing it for what it is and the competition out there is pretty weak. PUBG might have some merit but is a completely different type of game.
Battlefield 5 or WW2 BF will likely be more of the same because Dice/EA will not give up on Battlefront series and with the two game engines merged as one, we're just going to have to continue to eat it until we vote with our wallets. In business terms, they likely overpaid for the Star Wars usage rights, and are trying to salvage it by making horrible games with hype marketing. So for the President to save face before being voted out by stock holders of EA, he will continue to double down on it until he ready to retire.
Last edited: