Barton 2500+ vs. Tbred 1700+ (coming today)

[Shimmishim]

1700+ @ 2.5 ghz vs. barton 2500+ @ 2.35 ghz
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TEST SYSTEM
Abit NF&-S v 2.0
Palmtreepc PC3200 1 x 512mb
Swiftech MCW-5000A | AS3
Antec Truepower 430W | Onboard Soundstorm | Maxtor ATA133 7200rpm 2 x 60 gigs
GF4 Ti4200 @ 300x540 | 43.45 drivers | Win2Kpro


TEST CPU #1
AMD TBRED 1700+ (1.47 GHZ) 10TH WEEK OF 2003 JIUHB XPMW DLT3C (excaliberpc.com) TB

TEST CPU #2
AMD BARTON 2500+ (1.83 GHZ) 19TH WEEK OF 2003 AQXDA MPMW DKV4D (newegg.com) BT

> CAS Settings / Vdimm <
TB1: 2505mhz 200fsb 400ddr = 2.0-2-2-6 / 2.9v
TB2: 2505mhz 208fsb 416ddr = 2.0-3-3-6 / 2.9v
TB3: 2511mhz 218fsb 436ddr = 2.0-3-3-6 / 2.9v
BT1: 2363mhz 189fsb 378ddr = 2.0-3-3-6 / 2.9v

BENCHMARKS 1024x768x32

> 3DMark2001 <
TB1 = 13993
TB2 = 13889
TB3 = 14045
BT


> Comanche 4 Demo <
TB1 = 55.71 fps
TB2 = 56.23 fps
TB3 = 56.96 fps
BT


> Codecreatures Benchmark Pro <
TB1 = 29.1 fps
TB2 = 31.3 fps
TB3 = 31.3 fps
BT

> UT2k3 Benchmark (avg fps) D3D br-anubis / ctf-citadel / dm-antalus / dm-asbestos <
TB1 = 117.02 / 000000 / 127.00 / 000000 <--- I think ram timings were too fast *000000* represents scores that were extremely low
TB2 = 117.02 / 000000 / 127.03 / 000000
TB3 = 117.02 / 149.10 / 127.08 / 190.59

> Super Pi 1M <
TB1 = 44 seconds
TB2 = 45 seconds
TB3 = 44 seconds
BT1 = 48 seconds


> PiFast <
TB1 = 62.78 seconds
TB2 = 64.39 seconds
TB3 = 62.72 seconds
BT

> Prime95 1792K FFT<
TB1 = 127.522 ms
TB2 = 129.792 ms
TB3 = 129.631 ms
BT1 = 143.318 ms

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THUGSROOK FORMAT

 

[screw3d]

Good luck and we're waiting

 

[Corporate Thug]

Originally posted by: marvie
Good luck and we're waiting

 

[Doh!]

You might hit 2.7ghz with that barton. A friend of mine booted at 2.7ghz but only stable at 2.6ghz (227*11.5) running prime for a couple of days. Good luck.

 

[Shimmishim]

i've started

 

[Shimmishim]

i think the limit on this barton is around the 2.3 ghz mark

sad sad sad....

next barton please!!!

 

[INGlewood78]

Originally posted by: Shimmishim
i think the limit on this barton is around the 2.3 ghz mark

sad sad sad....

next barton please!!!

WOW really...I thought 2.3ghz witha 2500+ barton was considered really good!

 

[Shimmishim]

Originally posted by: INGlewood78

Originally posted by: Shimmishim
i think the limit on this barton is around the 2.3 ghz mark

sad sad sad....

next barton please!!!

WOW really...I thought 2.3ghz witha 2500+ barton was considered really good!

hehehe... who knows?

i was hoping to get 2.4 ghz

but no matter how many volts i put into it, it doesn't want to load windows....

11.5 x 202 is what i'm prime testing right now....

which is about 2323... almost 200 mhz slower than the 1700+ i have...

seems like the extra cache isn't enough to overcome the difference...

 

[screw3d]

Looks like my WPMW is a keepie until someone find a Barton that can at least beat my 1700+ for that price

 

[Shimmishim]

ugh...

2.331 ghz failed last night

trying 2.3 ghz right now ....

2.3 isn't too bad i guess... i was hoping for 2.4 though... oh well!

 

[Jen]

Originally posted by: Shimmishim
ugh...

2.331 ghz failed last night

trying 2.3 ghz right now ....

2.3 isn't too bad i guess... i was hoping for 2.4 though... oh well!

thats about avg for the bartons is 2300mhz . still when you consider how much cooler they run and the extra cache for some its worth it



there is rumor of new stepping out for the 1700+ JIXHB i believe thats the code. heard they are going to 2500 mhz on low voltage. havent seen any here yet



Jen

 

[bgeh]

Originally posted by: Jen

Originally posted by: Shimmishim
ugh...

2.331 ghz failed last night

trying 2.3 ghz right now ....

2.3 isn't too bad i guess... i was hoping for 2.4 though... oh well!

thats about avg for the bartons is 2300mhz . still when you consider how much cooler they run and the extra cache for some its worth it



there is rumor of new stepping out for the 1700+ JIXHB i believe thats the code. heard they are going to 2500 mhz on low voltage. havent seen any here yet



Jen

JIXHB? hmm, interesting. i'll go to lowyat.net and see if there's anything

 

[DAPUNISHER]

BT1: 2363mhz 189fsb 378ddr = 2.0-3-3-6 / 2.9v

What's up with dat Shim? Why not a lower multi and higher FSB???

EDIT: I see you're testing a higher fsb now.