Bare minimum requirements for running Win98 ??

Montano

Lifer
Jan 26, 2002
14,461
0
0
What are the official 'minimum requirements' for running Win98 ??

Proc speed, memory, etc...

Thanks :D
 

aswedc

Diamond Member
Oct 25, 2000
3,543
0
76
You could actually disable the processor check and run it on a 386 too, it uses no 486 instructions. I used this method to run 98SE on a NexGen Nx586.
 

Nothinman

Elite Member
Sep 14, 2001
30,672
0
0
Minimum requirements would probably be blindness and mild retardedness for me personally.
 

spyordie007

Diamond Member
May 28, 2001
6,229
0
0
Originally posted by: Montano
More info on disabling the proc check please :D
You're sick, if you really need a machine to dink around with I've got a couple of P2-266s w/ 192MB of RAM and 17" monitors, I'll sell you one of 'em (PM Me).

-Spy
 

Ionizer86

Diamond Member
Jun 20, 2001
5,292
0
76
I wouldn't run 98 on a machine less than a midrange P2 (I'd say about a P2 333 with 64MB ram) unless you're going to install 98 Lite to scrap the IE shell, in which case a ~P100 should be ok.
 

Bassyhead

Diamond Member
Nov 19, 2001
4,545
0
0
I've ran it on a P166 w/ 64MB RAM, slow but definitely usable for light stuff like web browsing and stuff
 

vegetation

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2001
4,270
2
0
Win98 ran great on my old P166 dell desktop with 64mb ram. However it ran like cr@p on my P133 Omnibook laptop with 80mb ram, I don't know why but when I installed 98lite to disable IE engine it was much much better.. So the morale of the story is disable IE if you got a slow system, then use Firebird or something.

 

Winchester

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2003
4,965
0
0
I am pretty sure I had it running on a 486 DX 100mhz with only 8mb ram. It was slower than molasses though. Took it forever to open calculator or notepad.
 

CTho9305

Elite Member
Jul 26, 2000
9,214
1
81
Originally posted by: aswedc
You could actually disable the processor check and run it on a 386 too, it uses no 486 instructions. I used this method to run 98SE on a NexGen Nx586.

I'm glad I didn't buy one of those... I would have been pretty pissed to find it was architecturally just a fast 386 and didn't support any of the new instructions :(.

edit: Oh, and I thought the i486 didn't introduce any new instructions - nothing changed until the Pentium... so anything that runs on a 486 should run on a 386 (albeit slowly ;))