This discussion is incredibly uninformed, and thus the anger is a little misplaced.
Right away, let me assure you that I am not going to defend someone making $350k. But I want to illustrate what is happening to the average joe in banking... the guy making I dunno 50-75k, with a good degree, experience, a mortgage, etc.
That's the profile of most banking officers, and yes, there are thousands of banking officers in a typical large bank, avps vps, etc in a bank, and yes the title system is stupid and mostly meaningless.
The higher you climb that officer ladder, or the more sales oriented your job is, the higher the % of your compensation is incentive (bonus) based.
This year, the average joe at a bank, with limited, if any, options to find a job at a competitor, has had to absorb two unannounced double whammies to their "total compensation" packages (TC = Salary+ benefits + incentive):
1) Most of the banks (and many other corps) have move from traditional insurance plans to high deductible HSAs and HRA plans, which would be fine, but they cost the same as last year's zero or low deductible insurance plans. The reason the cost is the same isnt just the rising cost of healthcare, it's because the bank used to buy down those deductibles, and it was a form of compensation. They stopped doing that, and it caught most of the employees off guard (most thought they'd have slightly higher deductibles or like a 10% price increase on the same old plans). What this means is that the average primary wage earner under one of these plans, now has to meet a deductible of up to $6,000 annually for a family plan. Grossed up, that is equivalent to about a $7500 compensation cut. A "pay" cut.
2) Then, the banks, despite posting record profits, have cut bonuses, by anywhere between 20 and 40% on average. On a $10K bonus (and realize, the employee performance to earn that bonus hasn't dropped in most cases, the employees have met their goals or at least worked like dogs to get close), that's another $3k or so cut.
Add those two up - that's a $10K+ compensation cut to the average banking employee. $10k out of maybe $70k or $80k previous total compensation. Not a complete blindside because some was expected, but the scale certainly wasnt. And after they worked just as hard (or in many cases harder) as previous years.
That hurts. That's not about "rich" folks. That's a hit to hundreds of thousands of families all across the country, and that's money that is not going back into their local economies for consumer goods (cars, appliances), contractors (we're finally getting a new fence/AC unit/water heater this year), modest beach/mountain/disney vacations, etc. So it in turn radiates outward to other industries/families/communities. You can bet it will have a measurable effect on both contractors and any tourist or vacation destination,a s well as all retail.
The kicker is that aholes at the top of the food chain will still get taken care of. Oh no, the CEO only got a $10Mil bonus instead of $20Mil. Scale does matter. He's not going to spend that money in the ecnomy the way that that $10Mil would have been spent if it was distributed out to his average paid employees (and the myth of high bank wages is a myth - most of the overpaid types are all on commission or very high incentive pay).
Sorry to rant about this, but I have a lot of friends and family in the industry, working at several of these banks and they all have the same story to tell. They're getting nailed by huge medical costs for routine stuff under those high deductible plans, while simultaneously getting no raises and having their bonuses chopped, sometimes entirely. It's easy to sneer at them, but it hurts. Some are diving into their savings just to pay necessary medical bills.