BAN OIKOS. OR ME. ONE OF US HAS TO GO.

[Yossarian]

WTF is up with bumping a million threads that are months old.

 

[Spoooon]

Bye.

 

[KK]

bump

 

[RagingBITCH]

How about we ban you both? Everybody wins.

 

What about a warning?

Isn't that an option? Must we always have a false dilemma created?

 

[KingNothing]

Could we at least ban his signature?

 

[Yossarian]

Originally posted by: luvly
What about a warning?

Isn't that an option? Must we always have a false dilemma created?

ON SECOND THOUGHT, BAN OIKOS OR LUVLY. WTF does a false dilemma have to do with anything.

 

[KK]

Originally posted by: KingNothing
Could we at least ban his signature?

You hate Jesus?



KK

 

[AgaBoogaBoo]

bye

 

Originally posted by: PipBoy

Originally posted by: luvly
What about a warning?

Isn't that an option? Must we always have a false dilemma created?

ON SECOND THOUGHT, BAN OIKOS OR LUVLY. WTF does a false dilemma have to do with anything.

Luvly likes to think she is "smart." Ignore her mindless drivel, although I do agree she must be banned.

 

[Schadenfreude]

Originally posted by: PipBoy

Originally posted by: luvly
What about a warning?

Isn't that an option? Must we always have a false dilemma created?

ON SECOND THOUGHT, BAN OIKOS OR LUVLY. WTF does a false dilemma have to do with anything.

Can we just ban luvly?

 

[pillage2001]

Originally posted by: Jehovah

Originally posted by: PipBoy

Originally posted by: luvly
What about a warning?

Isn't that an option? Must we always have a false dilemma created?

ON SECOND THOUGHT, BAN OIKOS OR LUVLY. WTF does a false dilemma have to do with anything.

Can we just ban luvly?

Seconded.

 

Originally posted by: pillage2001

Originally posted by: Jehovah

Originally posted by: PipBoy

Originally posted by: luvly
What about a warning?

Isn't that an option? Must we always have a false dilemma created?

ON SECOND THOUGHT, BAN OIKOS OR LUVLY. WTF does a false dilemma have to do with anything.

Can we just ban luvly?

Seconded.

Motion carries.

 

Well, it isn't my job to teach you to think. You created a false situation by implying that he had to be banned, whilst ignoring the option of a warning that might solve the problem.

Ban Luvly in your imagination . . . you already did, since it seems you have banned yourself in your ability to reason. She wouldn't care. . . .

 

[OIKOS]

BANNNNNNNNNNNNN!! :|

 

[KingNothing]

Originally posted by: KK

Originally posted by: KingNothing
Could we at least ban his signature?

You hate Jesus?



KK

No, just everything after that point.

 

Originally posted by: luvly
Well, it isn't my job to teach you to think. You created a false situation by implying that he had to be banned, whilst ignoring the option of a warning that might solve the problem.

Ban Luvly in your imagination . . . you already did, since it seems you have banned yourself in your ability to reason. She wouldn't care. . . .

once again, you prove your stupidity.

 

[Schadenfreude]

Originally posted by: FallenHero

Originally posted by: luvly
Well, it isn't my job to teach you to think. You created a false situation by implying that he had to be banned, whilst ignoring the option of a warning that might solve the problem.

Ban Luvly in your imagination . . . you already did, since it seems you have banned yourself in your ability to reason. She wouldn't care. . . .

once again, you prove your stupidity.

So we banning her or what?

 

Originally posted by: Jehovah

Originally posted by: FallenHero

Originally posted by: luvly
Well, it isn't my job to teach you to think. You created a false situation by implying that he had to be banned, whilst ignoring the option of a warning that might solve the problem.

Ban Luvly in your imagination . . . you already did, since it seems you have banned yourself in your ability to reason. She wouldn't care. . . .

once again, you prove your stupidity.

So we banning her or what?

I'd ban her with my ak-47 if possible.

 

[thomsbrain]

ban everyone or me. one of us has to go. there ain't room for the 150,000 of us.

 

[Schadenfreude]

Originally posted by: FallenHero

Originally posted by: Jehovah

Originally posted by: FallenHero

Originally posted by: luvly
Well, it isn't my job to teach you to think. You created a false situation by implying that he had to be banned, whilst ignoring the option of a warning that might solve the problem.

Ban Luvly in your imagination . . . you already did, since it seems you have banned yourself in your ability to reason. She wouldn't care. . . .

once again, you prove your stupidity.

So we banning her or what?

I'd ban her with my ak-47 if possible.

Hehe!

 

[Ness]

Originally posted by: FallenHero

Originally posted by: Jehovah

Originally posted by: FallenHero

Originally posted by: luvly
Well, it isn't my job to teach you to think. You created a false situation by implying that he had to be banned, whilst ignoring the option of a warning that might solve the problem.

Ban Luvly in your imagination . . . you already did, since it seems you have banned yourself in your ability to reason. She wouldn't care. . . .

once again, you prove your stupidity.

So we banning her or what?

I'd ban her with my ak-47 if possible.

*slips FH a fiver*

*pssbtbtbt* Make it fast

 

"I'd ban her with my ak-47 if possible."

Be forewarned, Fallenhero, if you again harass me or make any threats, I will report you to the administration of this forum and make sure action is taken. In fact, I will proceed to do so right now. Let it stop right there and right now.

 

[LongCoolMother]

Originally posted by: luvly
"I'd ban her with my ak-47 if possible."

Be forewarned, Fallenhero, if you again harass me or make any threats, I will report you to the administration of this forum and make sure action is taken. In fact, I will proceed to do so right now. Let it stop right there and right now.

:Q!!

 

[gunblade]

Can't we all get along ?