- Nov 20, 2009
- 10,046
- 2,573
- 136
Sen. Elizabeth Warren wants to do just that. Read. I can't help but say that I agree, but I think I would prefer a prohibition on lobbying donations.
I'm all for federal law makers having to liquidate individual stocks and move it to an indexed fund. No more winks and nods to individual company stocks you can make "enlightened" decisions on.
I'm all for federal law makers having to liquidate individual stocks and move it to an indexed fund. No more winks and nods to individual company stocks you can make "enlightened" decisions on.
It really is an odd notion that smart, wealthy people who are selfish enough to be turned away by fiscal ethics preventing them from looting are better for the country than people who want to serve for the sake of improving the country.The most common argument I hear against this is that smart wealthy people won't like it and won't run for congress if they can't control their holdings, thereby unfairly depriving us of their innate genius.
My response is: Don't threaten me with a good time.
The most common argument I hear against this is that smart wealthy people won't like it and won't run for congress if they can't control their holdings, thereby unfairly depriving us of their innate genius.
My response is: Don't threaten me with a good time.
Take it a bit further. Ban ALL government employees...and their immediate families from investing in the stock market. There are just too many ways to game the system.
What power do they have. No more than any other stock holder.I don't think you understand the ask you have there. A nurse working at a VA is a government employee. Should they and their family be prohibited?
Take it a bit further. Ban ALL government employees...and their immediate families from investing in the stock market. There are just too many ways to game the system.
I could see something like GS15 and above, including all elected officials and appointed positions, being barred from any active trading or holding on to anything other than broad index funds as a reasonable ethics rule. But most all of the lower levels really don't have any significant influence, and in the rare cases where they do, they are already (theoretically) barred from trading on it.I don't think you understand the ask you have there. A nurse working at a VA is a government employee. Should they and their family be prohibited?
I don't think you understand the ask you have there. A nurse working at a VA is a government employee. Should they and their family be prohibited?
Government employees are already prohibited from investing in any business that could be affected by the work the employee does.Take it a bit further. Ban ALL government employees...and their immediate families from investing in the stock market. There are just too many ways to game the system.
That’s great. They’ve reduced or entirely eliminated pensions in favor of TSP (govt 401k). So we just don’t get retirement now nor can we invest for it?Take it a bit further. Ban ALL government employees...and their immediate families from investing in the stock market. There are just too many ways to game the system.
I'm not in favor of going that far - just people that have a direct relation to passing legislation that effects the stock market. You know, market corruption and insider trading 101?That’s great. They’ve reduced or entirely eliminated pensions in favor of TSP (govt 401k). So we just don’t get retirement now nor can we invest for it?
That’s sort of what’s being talked aboutI bet politicians receive tonnes of money via trading their stocks by affiliates or their friends.