Bahahah...my daughter has to do a report on human reproduction

[alkemyst]

there is some guy here (i think) with the same avatar that is always 'finding' stuff on wiki. I am thinking they are the ones editing them though.

 

[Unmoosical]

What does a relatively "safe" picture of a penis for a jr. high student look like? Or do you all think they shouldn't have pictures of a penis on wiki? I didn't think it was that bad. Sure it was a little in your face with the surprise factor but not that bad.

 

[w3stfa11]

Originally posted by: theprodigalrebel
There is an animated GIF (2.35MB) on the page for 'ejaculation' :laugh:

That is one of the tasteless images I was talking about. Next they'll have a video of two women making out for the Lesbian article... hey, that's not such a bad idea.

 

[ConstipatedVigilante]

Originally posted by: v1001

Originally posted by: Leros
So how many of you looked up 'penis' or 'breast' on wikipedia immediately after reading this post?

I did however look up 'Breast' before 'Penis'.

Wow that is an awesome Breast picture I must say. Is that big scar from breast implants or something else? I think they should have used a picture of natural breasts.

I'm just gonna put it out there that I'm only guilty of "breast." And most of those breasts look pretty happy to be there. They're all "perky"! Ha! Get it?

 

[0roo0roo]

ah wiki walking fun. i'm surprised she didn't go further down the rabbit hole
britanica certainly never had anything on double penetration

 

[TheVrolok]

This thread has reaffirmed my thought that any man willing to get a prince albert deserves to have his right to have a penis removed.

 

[z0mb13]

WTF is a prince Albert? do I want to know??

 

[Fenixgoon]

Originally posted by: z0mb13
WTF is a prince Albert? do I want to know??

urbandictionary is your friend

 

[JC]

Wikipedia <> encyclopedia

 

[w3stfa11]

Originally posted by: JC
Wikipedia <> encyclopedia

Both encarta and britannica beg to differ.
http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9433599/Wikipedia
http://encarta.msn.com/encyclo.../Encyclopedia.html#p47

 

[mrkun]

Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
ah wiki walking fun. i'm surprised she didn't go further down the rabbit hole
britanica certainly never had anything on double penetration

I don't think Brittanica ever had anything on autofellatio either.

 

[mooglemania85]

Boys have a penis, girls have a vagina!

RUN! GET TO THE CHOPPPA!!!

 

[FoBoT]

perhaps animal husbandry would be ok

 

[Xavier434]

Originally posted by: mooglemania85
Boys have a penis, girls have a vagina!

RUN! GET TO THE CHOPPPA!!!

Awesome! Moogle just wrote the report for her.

A+

 

[trmiv]

Originally posted by: Leros
So how many of you looked up 'penis' or 'breast' on wikipedia immediately after reading this post?

I wanted to, but I'm at work.

 

[Kev]

this thread looks like fun

 

[jdini76]

Wikipedia: The new National Geographic.

 

[randay]

:camera:'s of daughter?

 

[Zenmervolt]

Originally posted by: Leros
So how many of you looked up 'penis' or 'breast' on wikipedia immediately after reading this post?

Everyone who is not at work I'm thinking.

ZV

 

[JulesMaximus]

Originally posted by: Fritzo
Seems my daugher (Jr. High) has to do research for a report on human reproduction by this Friday. She started working on it tonight since we have stuff planned the rest of the week. My wife said she looked up "penis" on wikipedia, and was shocked by the graphic pictures they have there.

I was thinking "oh geeze...they probably have a picture of a wiener and she's all bent out of shape". So I go there- OMG! *NSFW*!!!! They actually have a picture of a Prince Albert...shaved and unshaved....wtf????? I think users uploaded their own pics too. It looked like a big Craig's List ad

Meh, I didn't see anything too bad on there. What do you expect people to upload? Pictures of a drawing of a penis?

Edit-A search for sexual intercourse yields even more graphic pics...BTW-all the human ones are drawings. They do have a pic of lions and seagulls fucking though. Pretty funny. :laugh: