Bad at %'s in math, help in vcore and %'s over VID's

[btbam]

alright so can someone easily breakdown the whole 1.45 vcore * 104% over vid calculation?

Ive done like 1.45x.104 then add that number to the 1.45 move decimal over and still doesnt seem to match the actually vcore it runs when i save.


thanks for the info

Also, is 260x10 faster then 217x12 there both 2.6 ghz?

 

[Zensal]

What mobo are you using?

 

[btbam]

dfi 250 gb ut

 

[bigal40]

Btbam - Your not supposed to have pyramid scheme links in you sig. It will get you banned.

 

[SunSamurai]

260x10 = 2600
217x12 = 2604

ask yourself what one is more.

 

[nvbtye]

dknjgx

 

[fixxxer0]

yes but the ram will be running faster at the 260x10 assuming ur ram can handle it

 

[btbam]

Originally posted by: aeternitas
260x10 = 2600
217x12 = 2604

ask yourself what one is more.

I understand how common sense works, my question is there any differance in performance while running the fsb a little higher

 

[jdogg707]

Originally posted by: btbam

Originally posted by: aeternitas
260x10 = 2600
217x12 = 2604

ask yourself what one is more.

I understand how common sense works, my question is there any differance in performance while running the fsb a little higher

If your ram is running 1:1 at 260, it will be faster than if it is running 1:1 at 217...the extra 4MHZ in CPU speed will nowhere near outmatch the extra ram bandwidth. If you can run 10x260 1:1, then do it, it will be much faster and you will have a bad a$$ overclock to boot.