- Oct 17, 2005
- 321
- 0
- 76
Hello everyone,
I'm looking to improve the backup system I have at work. Right now we have a server with a 2 TB RAID array. It runs a program that is probably a glorified Windows version of rsync; you point it at a directory (in this case, a network share on every PC in the building). On a schedule (nightly), it looks at the directory for any changes and copies the altered files over (the entire file, even if only 1 kb changed in a 1 GB file).
My boss likes this because it dumps the 'real' files onto the server's file system instead of compressing them into an image file or whatever. I don't like this for approximately the same reason - it can't do any compression/deduplication, especially a problem when half the people in our company have the same 2 GB blob of engineering files for a project!
Now we're butting up against a bit of an issue. The RAID array is getting full and the server doesn't have very many SATA ports for more drives.
I was looking at the Drobo units, and they look very nice, but I'm not sure if they're the right solution. Ideally I'd have some sort of amazing centrally-managed deduplicating super-efficient backup system that would put data on an "appliance" like a Drobo... but then Drobo's web site starts talking about Symantec Backup Exec and iSCSI and virtual machines and I get lost very quickly.
Can anyone recommend a good way for us to structure our backup system?
I think the boss would be willing to spend a few thousand bucks on a solution, but we can't start hitting "Enterprise" level costs.
We have between 20 and 30 PCs that need backup on a nightly basis. They're all Windows XP or newer boxes attached to an active directory with a single Windows 2008 R2 server.
Thanks!
I'm looking to improve the backup system I have at work. Right now we have a server with a 2 TB RAID array. It runs a program that is probably a glorified Windows version of rsync; you point it at a directory (in this case, a network share on every PC in the building). On a schedule (nightly), it looks at the directory for any changes and copies the altered files over (the entire file, even if only 1 kb changed in a 1 GB file).
My boss likes this because it dumps the 'real' files onto the server's file system instead of compressing them into an image file or whatever. I don't like this for approximately the same reason - it can't do any compression/deduplication, especially a problem when half the people in our company have the same 2 GB blob of engineering files for a project!
Now we're butting up against a bit of an issue. The RAID array is getting full and the server doesn't have very many SATA ports for more drives.
I was looking at the Drobo units, and they look very nice, but I'm not sure if they're the right solution. Ideally I'd have some sort of amazing centrally-managed deduplicating super-efficient backup system that would put data on an "appliance" like a Drobo... but then Drobo's web site starts talking about Symantec Backup Exec and iSCSI and virtual machines and I get lost very quickly.
Can anyone recommend a good way for us to structure our backup system?
I think the boss would be willing to spend a few thousand bucks on a solution, but we can't start hitting "Enterprise" level costs.
We have between 20 and 30 PCs that need backup on a nightly basis. They're all Windows XP or newer boxes attached to an active directory with a single Windows 2008 R2 server.
Thanks!