AXP vs P4 review (damn funny)

[Stunt]

look at this moron...any disagreements?
review

 

[bluewall21]

ok.... Thats kind of weird.

 

[Stunt]

someone should email this tool...

 

[Wingznut]

A) You do realize the article is over three years old, right?
B) Why is the writer a "moron" and a "tool"?

 

[Stunt]

You do realize he gave points to intel for clockspeed, bus speed, cache size, and die size meanwhile giving one point to amd for performance...(moron)
:S...it's just a horrible review and is amusing that the guy would make a site with so little knowledge. (tool)

 

[Lonyo]

they increased the no-chip cache to 512K

No chip cache?

 

[Lonyo]

They guy is doing it as a joke anyway, he did the same for nVidia vs ATi.
Either that or he truely is a moron. It seems to just be a different take on things though, not so serious

 

[Stunt]

If you look at the next 3 pages...looks like he put a lot of time and effort into it...
don't think it is a joke...but his scoring system is so whack!

 

[Wingznut]

Originally posted by: Stunt
You do realize he gave points to intel for clockspeed, bus speed, cache size, and die size meanwhile giving one point to amd for performance...(moron)
:S...it's just a horrible review and is amusing that the guy would make a site with so little knowledge. (tool)

What are you talking about? In the first section (entitled "Technology DOGFIGHT"), where he gave the points for Intel that you mentioned, he called the dogfight a draw. He gave AMD points for socket size, die size, interface w/public, etc.

Where AMD lost this "dogfight" was in the overclocking department. And deservedly so, considering the contenders.

 

[MichaelZ]

if this was 2001, people might actually care.

 

[T9D]

It seems he just put a funny spin on it. But the final result was what it would have been anyway had he not thrown in all that other point stuff.