Awww, poor town isn't entitled to Lotto winner's cash...

athithi

Golden Member
Mar 5, 2002
1,717
0
0
Rebecca Jemison took the lump sum payment option of the $162 million jackpot, walking away with $67 million. Now, she's $1.4 million richer.

...

The city had planned to use the windfall to rehire some workers and improve parks and recreation programs.


Poor thing, how dare the city try to cheat her of her hard-earned money! God forbid, she give something back to the community...

rolleye.gif
 

athithi

Golden Member
Mar 5, 2002
1,717
0
0
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Because in reality, it's the city that earned it...

No, God laid the sidewalks and maintains all our parks...


Who got the other 95 million?

I dunno....Iraq?
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
Originally posted by: athithi
Rebecca Jemison took the lump sum payment option of the $162 million jackpot, walking away with $67 million. Now, she's $1.4 million richer.

...

The city had planned to use the windfall to rehire some workers and improve parks and recreation programs.


Poor thing, how dare the city try to cheat her of her hard-earned money! God forbid, she give something back to the community...

rolleye.gif

Does anyone think city/state workers are generally overpaid and overcompensated and paid too much in retirement benefits?


When will some of these elitists cut their own salary instead of raping the education funds?
 

sMiLeYz

Platinum Member
Feb 3, 2003
2,696
0
76
If I won that much money, I would gladly donate that 1.4 million amount to the city.
 

kylebisme

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2000
9,396
0
0
i'd possably do the same. but if they tried to take it from me only to find out they had no legal right to it i would laugh in their face and tell them to piss off. :D
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
Originally posted by: sMiLeYz
If I won that much money, I would gladly donate that 1.4 million amount to the city.

Why? Because the Government knows how to spend your money better than you? Because they are so efficient?
 

athithi

Golden Member
Mar 5, 2002
1,717
0
0
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: sMiLeYz
If I won that much money, I would gladly donate that 1.4 million amount to the city.

Why? Because the Government knows how to spend your money better than you? Because they are so efficient?

No, because $1.4M is not going to buy you any happiness that $67M doesn't.
 

b0mbrman

Lifer
Jun 1, 2001
29,470
1
81
Originally posted by: athithi
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Because in reality, it's the city that earned it...

No, God laid the sidewalks and maintains all our parks...
That city is certainly living on the edge if it depends on taxing lottery winners to maintain their sidewalks and parks

 

athithi

Golden Member
Mar 5, 2002
1,717
0
0
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Originally posted by: athithi
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Because in reality, it's the city that earned it...

No, God laid the sidewalks and maintains all our parks...
That city is certainly living on the edge if it depends on taxing lottery winners to maintain their sidewalks and parks

:D Ok, I'll let go here...
 

Genesys

Golden Member
Nov 10, 2003
1,536
0
0
Originally posted by: athithi
Rebecca Jemison took the lump sum payment option of the $162 million jackpot, walking away with $67 million. Now, she's $1.4 million richer.

...

The city had planned to use the windfall to rehire some workers and improve parks and recreation programs.


Poor thing, how dare the city try to cheat her of her hard-earned money! God forbid, she give something back to the community...

rolleye.gif

oh well, if she wants to be selfish with her money, then so be it.

and as for it being hard earned money shouldnt matter. its her money, thats all that matters.
 

KK

Lifer
Jan 2, 2001
15,903
4
81
She doesn't have to give a damn thing to the city, and 95% of you wouldn't either. Who the fvck cares what the city was going to spend the money on. Just like I should care about what the liar that said she won the lottery was going to rehire laid off cleveland police officers.

Geez, most of you guys are like a bunch of feeding lemmings. Trying to get your greedy hands what is not yours. And what the hell do you care in the first place.

KK
 
Jan 12, 2003
3,498
0
0
Originally posted by: athithi
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: sMiLeYz
If I won that much money, I would gladly donate that 1.4 million amount to the city.

Why? Because the Government knows how to spend your money better than you? Because they are so efficient?

No, because $1.4M is not going to buy you any happiness that $67M doesn't.

..by whose standards? Because it won't "buy you any happiness that $67M doesn't," you naturally assume that we are (or should live our lives) like you? Who are you to tell other people about their happiness and the utility they derive from money?
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Originally posted by: Gonad the Barbarian
Who got the other 95 million?
Uncle


holy crap, whats the tax rate ????? How can she walk away with 67mil outta 160? Thats more than 60% tax...
 

rudder

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
19,441
86
91
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Originally posted by: Gonad the Barbarian
Who got the other 95 million?
Uncle


holy crap, whats the tax rate ????? How can she walk away with 67mil outta 160? Thats more than 60% tax...

You only get the full 162 million (pre tax) if you decide on a 20 year payout. There is a lump sum option which is typically less than the listed jackpot. Not sure how they figure that out.
 

athithi

Golden Member
Mar 5, 2002
1,717
0
0
Originally posted by: KK
She doesn't have to give a damn thing to the city, and 95% of you wouldn't either. Who the fvck cares what the city was going to spend the money on. Just like I should care about what the liar that said she won the lottery was going to rehire laid off cleveland police officers.

Geez, most of you guys are like a bunch of feeding lemmings. Trying to get your greedy hands what is not yours. And what the hell do you care in the first place.

KK

You really believe that's how the world works? Everyone keeps what they get? That aside, I have a right to mock her just as she has a right to hide that money (the $1.4M) from the needy. If anything, I have a slight moral edge :p

Mr.Wannabe-Peikoff:

..by whose standards? Because it won't "buy you any happiness that $67M doesn't," you naturally assume that we are (or should live our lives) like you? Who are you to tell other people about their happiness and the utility they derive from money?

Rand did not know it all and you know even less - hence, my words of wisdom. I know more and I know better. Now, let me sit back and wait for you to contradict yourself in an attempt to correct me...
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,858
6,394
126
That city kinda put their foot in their mouth. Once they realized their error they should have STFU about it, now she may have reason to move, though she may move anyway for other reasons. Though they can't tax her lotto winnings, they could(most likely) get taxes from other sources of income, such as investment income or property taxes, etc. That would make them as much, but it would get them more than if she chooses to leave.

As for should she give the money to the city anyway? That's her choice, maybe she would have or maybe she would have, over time, given much more. By turning this into a public issue she may choose not to give 1 red cent.

I kinda agree with others, that the amount in question is small and she would not be hurt by paying that at all, but it's her money and her choice whether to donate it or not. Personally, I'd probably give the money to particular programs or projects. Such as: after school sports/activities, community centres, skateboard park, United Way/Salvation Army/other social org, etc.