- Jan 29, 2007
- 6,374
- 1
- 81
Originally posted by: Wreckage
Actually that's Crysis: Warhead which is not a very demanding game.
Originally posted by: Wreckage
Actually that's Crysis: Warhead which is not a very demanding game.
Originally posted by: allies
lava - you expect it to run on your Voodoo5?![]()
Originally posted by: Dadofamunky
I'm sorry, but for slide shows, only a CP/M machine will do
Originally posted by: Woofmeister
Sorry, but testing any high-powered graphics solution with a game running 1680 x 1050 is not very helpful. Who runs at that resolution? Next time try Crysis Warhead at 1600 x 1200 and 1920 x 1200 and see how things shake out.
Originally posted by: Woofmeister
Sorry, but testing any high-powered graphics solution with a game running 1680 x 1050 is not very helpful. Who runs at that resolution? Next time try Crysis Warhead at 1600 x 1200 and 1920 x 1200 and see how things shake out.
Originally posted by: Woofmeister
Sorry, but testing any high-powered graphics solution with a game running 1680 x 1050 is not very helpful. Who runs at that resolution? Next time try Crysis Warhead at 1600 x 1200 and 1920 x 1200 and see how things shake out.
Originally posted by: Wreckage
Actually that's Crysis: Warhead which is not a very demanding game.
Originally posted by: OCguy
Average FPS still goes to nV on that chart.
Also, dont we usually take the highest resolution to judge cards?
Ive never really seen anyone put weight into 22 inch settings.
Originally posted by: Candymancan21
Those results are about what i see on crysis on gamer at 1680x1050. Dont look at the HIGH look at the average and min. My entire time playing through crysis warhead on my 4890 my fps hardly ever saw the light of day above 44. Average was like 30-40, in fact i dont remember my fps ever getting to the high 60's or 70's like that except maybe inside a ship or building.
Originally posted by: OCguy
Average FPS still goes to nV on that chart.
Also, dont we usually take the highest resolution to judge cards?
Ive never really seen anyone put weight into 22 inch settings.
I always look at those results. 19x12 or higher is Impractical to me and about 80% of the other people. Do you relise that most people game at 1680x1050 ? 19x12 is a very small margin. Oh btw 19" LCD's can do 1680x1050 its not just a 22" resolution. In fact the picture looks 10x better on the 19" due to the smaller pixel pitch.
Originally posted by: ronnn
Originally posted by: Woofmeister
Sorry, but testing any high-powered graphics solution with a game running 1680 x 1050 is not very helpful. Who runs at that resolution? Next time try Crysis Warhead at 1600 x 1200 and 1920 x 1200 and see how things shake out.
I don't see a huge percentage difference as the resolution increases, so not sure what your point is?
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Ok Wreckage, please name 5 games that are more demanding than Crysis Warhead.
Originally posted by: Wreckage
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Ok Wreckage, please name 5 games that are more demanding than Crysis Warhead.
Well the original Crysis for one.
However there has been optimization in that the environment is more detailed, and there's much more action on screen at any time