Originally posted by: Evander
Originally posted by: rxblitzrx
doesn't avira have better detection rates and false positives than AVG? i don't understand why AVG has 10x more downloads on download.com
In my case, I think the cure (avira) is worse than the disease (potential virus). Not that Avira is bad,
but I'm an advanced, careful user and have never had a virus, but I have anti-virus software installed just in case (AVG). Basically, I'm not worried about being infected and want something that will stay out of my way. Antivir will give an annoying popup every day when it updates. AVG will stay out of your way simply by unchecking "notify me of the update process" and bam- it's set and forget. I'm aware antivir's popup can be disabled but let's face it- disabled illegitimately. It'd be like disabling a nag screen on a shareware app that doesn't expire- the developers are hoping you will enjoy the free functionality enough to purchase the software, and the popup is there to remind you to (hopefully) pay. So you're pretty much cheating Avira if you disable the pop-up. If anyhone has proof of a recent email from Avira stating that they approve of popup disable, I guess I'll eat my words but until then I'll stick with a nag-free AV solution- AVG.
Haven't ever tried Avast but my understanding is they require registration. AVG doesn't have such a policy. I have PC Tools Antivirus and AOL McCaffee in my bookmarks as backup plans, but haven't really looked into them. Others like Clamwin and Bitdefender don't offer realtime protection (though I used to use those on low spec machines as scanners).
So in short, I use AVG b/c I like it's policies- it is nag free, registration free, and reasonably effective. Even though there are better paid solutions (kaspersky and nod32), I'm considering maybe buying an AVG license maybe once every few years- not b/c I need the extra features but b/c it's my way of giving a donation to a company that puts out the freest AV with real time protection.