Average performance? Raptor vs. 1TB Seagate 7200 drive..

astralsolace

Junior Member
Dec 3, 2007
23
0
0
I ordered an X-25M 160GB based on Anand's article recently, and was reading through some of the threads here. I hadn't benchmarked my drives before, but was curious because of some results people posted.


Drive #1:

WD1500AHFD - (150GB Raptor) 50.8GB free - recently defragged

--------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 2.2 (C) 2007-2008 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
--------------------------------------------------

Sequential Read : 70.783 MB/s
Sequential Write : 73.010 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 30.252 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 45.344 MB/s
Random Read 4KB : 0.621 MB/s
Random Write 4KB : 1.498 MB/s

Test Size : 100 MB
Date : 2009/09/16 21:30:34


Drive #2:

ST31000340AS (1TB Seagate drive, 7200rpm) - 276GB free - recently defragged

Sequential Read : 83.472 MB/s
Sequential Write : 78.971 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 34.413 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 62.911 MB/s
Random Read 4KB : 0.556 MB/s
Random Write 4KB : 0.979 MB/s

Test Size : 100 MB
Date : 2009/09/16 21:24:50
-------
Other system specs:
Q6600 overclocked to 3.2GHz
4GB DDR2 800MHz @ 4-4-4-12
Abit IP35 Pro
Vista x64 Home Premium
8800GT 512MB (slightly overclocked)


What's the deal? Shouldn't a raptor be much faster than a 7200rpm 1TB drive? Instead, it's slower in every regard except 4KB read/write. *perplexed* :(
 

Elixer

Lifer
May 7, 2002
10,371
762
126
The seagate packs the info much more denser. Your benchmark is also a bit flawed, the test area can be on the slower non edge of the platter of the drive, which can make it slower. Easier to benchmark empty drives. :)
Though, WD still wins in the seek time department.