Average cost per pupil in NJ is $19k.

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
30,922
8,837
136
until people realize that education starts in the home, the cost per pupil will continue to rise
 
Apr 27, 2012
10,086
58
86
Of course leftist idiots are going to say spend more money but you can't just keep throwing money at the problem.

If you really want to resolve this then allow more charter schools and private schools but the left doesn't want that because of the teachers unions.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,095
513
126
Think of the children!

Trends%20in%20American%20Public%20Schooling%20from%20the%20CATO%20Institute.JPG
 

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,751
3,068
121
I have no kids, and the cost in my taxes to pay for some of the ones I see enter the workplace and be complete morons kinda ticks me off a bit.

All I have to say.

I won't be alive to see the future anyway, but seems like reverse evolution more or less.
 
Last edited:

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
32,706
6,834
136
How much wealthier would the average family be with that $19k a year? That's per child. Average of 3 children, $57,000. How much better would their home life be, how much better could their home schooling be?

Humanity has the internet. All the combined knowledge of our entire species freely available for education purposes. Schools are obsolete. Perhaps it's time to seize the initiative and make that potential a reality.
 

Zaap

Diamond Member
Jun 12, 2008
7,162
424
126
The documentary "The Cartel" is a real eye-opener explaining the fucked up situation in NJ.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QcVg9YM_SCg

As always, I dare the statists to watch it.

The whole rotten system in NJ is big government personified, so OF COURSE statists defend it tooth and nail, and attack the messenger for making a documentary about it, but can never counter any of the facts raised- all the usual.
 
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
"The annual "Taxpayer’s Guide to Education Spending" showed wealthy Avalon Borough in Cape May County at the top of the list of districts and charter schools, spending $43,775 a student. The lowest district, Rockaway Borough, spent $12,587."
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
81,309
43,336
136
How much wealthier would the average family be with that $19k a year? That's per child. Average of 3 children, $57,000. How much better would their home life be, how much better could their home schooling be?

Humanity has the internet. All the combined knowledge of our entire species freely available for education purposes. Schools are obsolete. Perhaps it's time to seize the initiative and make that potential a reality.

The idea that we can replace schools with the internet is frankly preposterous.
 

Mai72

Lifer
Sep 12, 2012
11,526
1,703
126
How much wealthier would the average family be with that $19k a year? That's per child. Average of 3 children, $57,000. How much better would their home life be, how much better could their home schooling be?

Humanity has the internet. All the combined knowledge of our entire species freely available for education purposes. Schools are obsolete. Perhaps it's time to seize the initiative and make that potential a reality.

Lol,

Unions would never allow that to happen. It would have to be law, and I don't see politicians doing it anytime soon.
 

Mai72

Lifer
Sep 12, 2012
11,526
1,703
126
"The annual "Taxpayer’s Guide to Education Spending" showed wealthy Avalon Borough in Cape May County at the top of the list of districts and charter schools, spending $43,775 a student. The lowest district, Rockaway Borough, spent $12,587."

I live near Avalon. It's a very wealthy district. Multimillion dollar summer houses. The school population is very small. Graduating 6th grade class was 40 less than 20 students last year.
 

the DRIZZLE

Platinum Member
Sep 6, 2007
2,956
1
81
The cato institute lies
http://shermandorn.com/wordpress/?p=4675

Don't be fooled by dishonest people.

Don't be fooled by some idiot's blog. I downloaded the cost per pupil data and was able to exactly recreate the cost per pupil line exactly as it appears on the chart presented.

The blog author incorrectly assumes that the cost per pupil is generated by multiplying the cost per pupil in the year of graduation by 13. However, that is incorrect and not the way that any intelligent person would do it. The correct approach is to add the cost in the current year and in the prior 12 years on a rolling basis.

I can send you the excel file if you don't believe me. I'm not going to address test score argument, but the bottom line is that costs per pupil have more than tripled after adjusting for inflation since 1970.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,145
10
81
It's not how much money we pay per student. its how we teach those students.

the country keeps looking for a easy way to teach students.they try these things out and then are shocked when it does not work. so they try another easy way..etc etc.

now 30 years of trying to to find a easy way to teach kids the scores across the board have dropped.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
67,487
24,062
136
Of course leftist idiots are going to say spend more money but you can't just keep throwing money at the problem.

If you really want to resolve this then allow more charter schools and private schools but the left doesn't want that because of the teachers unions.
How will this solve the problem? Arizona charter schools get $1300/pupil more than the public schools and the charter school students still do worse on standardized tests.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,145
10
81
How will this solve the problem? Arizona charter schools get $1300/pupil more than the public schools and the charter school students still do worse on standardized tests.

standardized test aren't the end all either. I think they are doing far more harm then good.

as it is with so much riding on the test schools teach HOW to take the test. Not what the test covers.

there have also been reports that some schools will stick to only exactly what the test covers and not everything the child should be taught.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
67,487
24,062
136
standardized test aren't the end all either. I think they are doing far more harm then good.

as it is with so much riding on the test schools teach HOW to take the test. Not what the test covers.

there have also been reports that some schools will stick to only exactly what the test covers and not everything the child should be taught.
I agree with all you've written. The Arizona legislature however doesn't and penalizes public schools based on those tests.
 

mizzou

Diamond Member
Jan 2, 2008
9,734
54
91
Think of the children!

Trends%20in%20American%20Public%20Schooling%20from%20the%20CATO%20Institute.JPG

schools are a little topheavy nowadays, but think of all the logistic problems they have. Federal government has their fist up the ass of every state educational institution. Even parents, want to litigate the paint off the walls off a moments notice.

Kids have 1,000,000 new medical conditions that need specific medical, psychological, and emotional attention.

And we also just don't teach with books....schools have their own web domains and offer multitudes of electronic learning experiences.


So yeah....teaching is getting a bit more complicated.


Too bad kids are still the same dumb kids ;)
 

spacejamz

Lifer
Mar 31, 2003
10,697
1,295
126
If the school systems cannot figure out the connection between no more/less required PE classes and more obese students, no amount of money will fix things...
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY