Originally posted by: aves2k
I'm not sure about how much extra bandwidth more avatars would take but the most likely reason for not having the BSD Demon or the Windows logo is that they are trademarks and legally protected.
Originally posted by: Paulson
I think we have enough Avatars for now, and considering as to how anandtech's already limited on bandwidth, adding more avatars wouldn't help too much.
Originally posted by: Chaotic42
I'd like one of those, or a Debian Swirl
Wishful thinking.
I guess I'll stick with the snake. It's the only one other than the flag and ribbons that I like.
Originally posted by: werk
BSD Daemon & Windows logo are trademarked. Aint gonna happen.
Originally posted by: Azraele
Subscriber only avatars would be cool.![]()
Originally posted by: Rallispec
Originally posted by: Azraele
Subscriber only avatars would be cool.![]()
yeah that definetly would be a nice added feature
Thank god you're only a lifer.Originally posted by: ffmcobalt
Originally posted by: Rallispec
Originally posted by: Azraele
Subscriber only avatars would be cool.![]()
yeah that definetly would be a nice added feature
But that openly advocates a difference or separation from subscribers and regular members. Anand specifically does not want anything remotely close to that. That gets people eventually saying "you lowly non-subscriber!" and actually meaning it. Maybe not now, but face it... everything degrades, including society. If one open, blatant, and public separation is made and is acceptable, then there might be a push and eventually another made. Then another. And another. And eventually you have an entire class system here at AT.
*cough*Elite*cough*
...and we can't have that, now can we...
nik
Originally posted by: aves2k
I'm not sure about how much extra bandwidth more avatars would take but the most likely reason for not having the BSD Demon or the Windows logo is that they are trademarks and legally protected.
Why would that take extra bandwidth? Everyone would still only have one avatar.Originally posted by: Paulson
I think we have enough Avatars for now, and considering as to how anandtech's already limited on bandwidth, adding more avatars wouldn't help too much.
Originally posted by: ffmcobalt
Originally posted by: Rallispec
Originally posted by: Azraele
Subscriber only avatars would be cool.![]()
yeah that definetly would be a nice added feature
But that openly advocates a difference or separation from subscribers and regular members. Anand specifically does not want anything remotely close to that. That gets people eventually saying "you lowly non-subscriber!" and actually meaning it. Maybe not now, but face it... everything degrades, including society. If one open, blatant, and public separation is made and is acceptable, then there might be a push and eventually another made. Then another. And another. And eventually you have an entire class system here at AT.
*cough*Elite*cough*
...and we can't have that, now can we...
nik
Originally posted by: mechBgon
A while back, I asked the owner of the BSD Demon if he would permit its adoption as an avatar, and he declined. Somehow I doubt I'd even get an answer from Microsoft on the use of Clippy, unless it was a definitive "no."
Originally posted by: Zim Hosein
Originally posted by: mechBgon
A while back, I asked the owner of the BSD Demon if he would permit its adoption as an avatar, and he declined. Somehow I doubt I'd even get an answer from Microsoft on the use of Clippy, unless it was a definitive "no."
mechBgon, I'm glad we can't have an avitar of "clippy," remember this URL from MS: http://www.microsoft.com/office/clippy/game.asp![]()
Originally posted by: Rallispec
stop trying to steal my avatar.
![]()
