Australian PM ousted.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Martin

Lifer
Jan 15, 2000
29,178
1
81
Well, this was a surprise:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...alia-gets-first-female-leader/article1615394/

Australia's ruling party ousted its leader Thursday in a sudden revolt that also delivered the country its first female leader and stunned the public.

Kevin Rudd's deputy, Julia Gillard, was elected leader in an uncontested vote about 12 hours after she surprised many colleagues by challenging a prime minister who until recently was one of the most popular in modern Australian history.

The removal of Mr. Rudd – best known as one of the West's few Chinese-speaking leaders and for helping to broker the Copenhagen climate change agreement – showed his party had lost faith that he could win a second term at national elections due within months.

Confusing to say the least.
 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
Seemed like a sure thing to occur after his rather incredible flip-flop on climate change.

Australia and carbon emissions: A change in the climate

ONLY a few months ago Kevin Rudd, Australia’s prime minister, was painting a dark picture about looming storm surges, rising sea-levels, a fall of over 90% in irrigated farming and a drop of nearly 2.5% in GNP over this century unless Australia took action against climate change. “Action now,” he declared. “Not action delayed.”

But this week Mr Rudd climbed down from what seemed a defining pledge of his leadership. Instead of using this year to get parliament to adopt an emissions-trading scheme that would put a price on carbon pollution, action will now be delayed until 2013 at least. Some wonder if it will ever happen at all.

Few leaders have staked more than Mr Rudd on tackling climate change. The issue helped him lead the Labor Party to power in late 2007, after the former conservative coalition government had largely ignored it. Relying on coal for most of its electricity, Australia is one of the world’s highest carbon-emitters per person. Mr Rudd hoped that forcing it to change how it uses energy would give the country clout in forging a global consensus.

All that unravelled late last year. His government’s planned cap-and-trade scheme set targets to cut carbon emissions by 5% of 2000 levels by 2020, or 25% as part of concerted global action. Having initially supported the scheme, the main opposition Liberal Party used its controlling numbers in parliament’s upper house in early December to block it for a second time.

The failure of the Copenhagen climate summit that month took more shine off the vision.

With an election due this year, Mr Rudd always held a constitutional trump card: the power to dissolve both houses of parliament together, and resubmit the bill to the new parliament. Instead, looking somewhat sheepish, he announced in Sydney on April 27th that the government would now do nothing until the period covered by the Kyoto protocol ends in late 2012.

He offered two excuses: the need for more time to judge any global actions on climate change before Australia goes ahead itself; and the opposition’s “backflip” in parliament.
 

Draftee

Member
Feb 13, 2009
68
0
0
Even a week is a long time in politics.

I think the voters gave him a spanking for not staying the course on the emissions trading scheme, even when the going got tough.
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
Its an internal Australian issue, and as a US citizen, what right do I have to comment?
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Its an internal Australian issue, and as a US citizen, what right do I have to comment?

You have every right to comment under the First Amendment.

In addition, Australia's politics create international issues. What would happen if they take another turn towards their former plans of refugee rape camps? Their actions form a core part of the stability of that area of the world.
 

Draftee

Member
Feb 13, 2009
68
0
0
You have every right to comment under the First Amendment.

In addition, Australia's politics create international issues. What would happen if they take another turn towards their former plans of refugee rape camps? Their actions form a core part of the stability of that area of the world.
They plan 'refugee rape camps'? What 'rock' are you on?

Apparently there's an election in August.
 

Kadarin

Lifer
Nov 23, 2001
44,296
16
81
Its an internal Australian issue, and as a US citizen, what right do I have to comment?

As a US citizen, you probably don't have the right to vote in Australia, but as others have said, the US is at least in principle a free country and the First Amendment to the US Constitution prevents the government from taking away your right to freedom of speech.
 

Munky

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2005
9,372
0
76
I'm surprised he had as much support in the first place, with his cap-n-scam lunacy... or maybe that support was not from the average joe, but the big banks that really matter.
 

ShawnD1

Lifer
May 24, 2003
15,987
2
81
I often say that very same thing about the Canucks when they comment on U.S. politics as if they lived here and had a say in it.
Canada is a larger contributor to the US economy than most of the souther United States. Canada is your biggest trade partner; Mississippi is your biggest welfare recipient.

Speaking of which, people in Mississippi shouldn't be allowed to vote. If your state sucks that bad, then the opinions of the people living there are probably worthless.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.