Audio of the explosives which brought down WTC 7

[kylebisme]

Back in my previous but now locked thread about WTC 7's free fall, many were upset by the fact that I'd refused to claim explosives brought down WTC 7 because I lacked the evidence to do so. That has recently changed, as I've come across a recording of a sequence of explosions in the moments prior to the building coming down, albeit very faint as it was captured by an interview mic four blocks away, as can be heard here. Also, the last explosion was captured by a slightly closer camera mic, as can be heard just after the change between clips here.

Anyway, between the audio evidence, and other evidence such as the iron-rich microspheres and underacted nano-thermite found in the dust, along with the lack of any experimental confirmation to support the notion of fire-induced free fall; surely nobody has a sound argument to suggest the destruction of WTC 7 was anything but a controlled demolition?

 

[Taejin]

*lawnchair*

 

[PeshakJang]

Just because your evidence is sound, doesn't mean your evidence is sound.

That, and you're an idiot.

 

[waggy]

wow after the beat down you got i figured you would just stay quite.

 

[Patranus]

 

[kylebisme]

A few questions for my detractors:

1. What do you believe the sequence of booms which caused people four blocks away to snap their heads in the direction of the building just prior to it coming down was?
2. What do you attribute the iron-rich microspheres and underacted flakes of nano-thermite found in the dust to?
3. How do you explain the inability of either the official investigations or anyone else to provide experimental confirmation to support the notion of fire-induced free fall?

 

[Patranus]

A few questions for my detractors:

1. What do you believe the sequence of booms which caused people four blocks away to snap their heads in the direction of the building just prior to it coming down was?
2. What do you attribute the iron-rich microspheres and underacted flakes of nano-thermite found in the dust to?
3. How do you explain the inability of either the official investigations or anyone else to provide experimental confirmation to support the notion of fire-induced free fall?

 

[Zebo]

One question for you : Why do you exclusively post only in threads concerning Muslims and make excuses for terrorists and/or tries to justify their actions in you're not a Muslim or terrorist apologist?

 

[PeshakJang]

Listen, shut up for a minute...

New Topic: Hilarious tribute to George Steinbrenner

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3eNPO8nAE0&feature=related

RIP

 

[kylebisme]

One question for you...

If you'd be so kind to answer my three questions first, I'd be happy to reciprocate by answering yours.

 

[Tristicus]

 

[SAWYER]

yeah an explosion from two planes piloted by radical Islam

 

[PeshakJang]

big stein wants his eggplant calzone!

 

[kylebisme]

yeah an explosion from two planes piloted by radical Islam

No, the sequence of explosions I'm referring to was right before WTC 7 came down, which was around 7 hours after the two planes hitting WTC 1 and WTC 2, so you can't rightly blame that on planes.

Also, the Arabs who were apparently involved in hijacking the planes weren't into Islam, but rather alcohol and strippers.

 

[PeshakJang]

No, the sequence of explosions I'm referring to was right before WTC 7 came down, which was around 7 hours after the two planes hitting WTC 1 and WTC 2, so you can't rightly blame that on planes.

1. How do you account for the irrefutable evidence of nano-muslims in the rubble of tower 7?
2. What about the inability of any official three-lettered agency to provide experimental proof that the towers aren't actually still there?
3. For 18 years I had the same thing for lunch every day... turkey chili in a bread bowl... first you eat the chili, then the bowl... no mess!

 

[First]

The lack of mathematical evidence for a conspiracy is well documented in the OP's original conspiracy theory thread, and the lack of any attempt other than high school algebra to show otherwise is sufficient enough proof that no one particularly informed on the events of 9/11 believes in a conspiracy to bring down the towers.

 

[Craig234]

The guy who is completely wrong here, Kyle, is doing a lot better job arguing his side than his opponents.

I'm not sure I want to spend the time to once again get into the response to his points, but if someone is going to respond it'd be nice to see a better argument than name-calling.

 

[Red Dawn]

Back in my previous but now locked thread about WTC 7's free fall, many were upset by the fact that I'd refused to claim explosives brought down WTC 7 because I lacked the evidence to do so. That has recently changed, as I've come across a recording of a sequence of explosions in the moments prior to the building coming down, albeit very faint as it was captured by an interview mic four blocks away, as can be heard here. Also, the last explosion was captured by a slightly closer camera mic, as can be heard just after the change between clips here.

Anyway, between the audio evidence, and other evidence such as the iron-rich microspheres and underacted nano-thermite found in the dust, along with the lack of any experimental confirmation to support the notion of fire-induced free fall; surely nobody has a sound argument to suggest the destruction of WTC 7 was anything but a controlled demolition?

Well according to you Rogaine is a conspiracy

 

[Greenman]

Back in my previous but now locked thread about WTC 7's free fall, many were upset by the fact that I'd refused to claim explosives brought down WTC 7 because I lacked the evidence to do so. That has recently changed, as I've come across a recording of a sequence of explosions in the moments prior to the building coming down, albeit very faint as it was captured by an interview mic four blocks away, as can be heard here. Also, the last explosion was captured by a slightly closer camera mic, as can be heard just after the change between clips here.

Anyway, between the audio evidence, and other evidence such as the iron-rich microspheres and underacted nano-thermite found in the dust, along with the lack of any experimental confirmation to support the notion of fire-induced free fall; surely nobody has a sound argument to suggest the destruction of WTC 7 was anything but a controlled demolition?

You've changed my mind. Bush blew up the WTC so he could start a war in Afghanistan for reasons that aren't readily apparent to me. Now what? Tomorrow morning I'm going to walk into the world armed with this new knowledge and do what? Where is this going? The investigation is over, the buildings are gone, the guy's who flew the alleged planes are dead, the passengers in those planes are all living in a nameless country under assumed names for reasons not readily apparent to me, and we can't figure out where they are. So hear I am, a loyal minion of the "Bush did it" camp with nowhere to go and nothing to do. I ask again, where is this going?

 

[JEDIYoda]

Also, the Arabs who were apparently involved in hijacking the planes weren't into Islam, but rather alcohol and strippers.

You know thats BS excuse!!
Just because Jimmy Swaggert was a pracher doesn`t mean he was into prostitutes......

Just because ther terrorists liked stripeprs and alcohol does not take away from the fact they were Islamic...lol

 

[waggy]

Well according to you Rogaine is a conspiracy

IT IS! i tried it and that shit didn't work! A CONSPIRACY I TELL YOU!

i heard bush owns the company.

 

[kylebisme]

The lack of mathematical evidence...

I've provided more math than any of you arguing against me apparently can, and even if I never had; this thread is about the audio evidence.

...Kyle, is doing a lot better job arguing his side than his opponents.

That's because I'm not wrong, and you all are just in denial, as explained by the abstract of this American behavioral Scientist paper:

In Denial of Democracy: Social Psychological Implications for Public Discourse on State Crimes Against Democracy Post-9/11

Protecting democracy requires that the general public be educated on how people can be manipulated by government and media into forfeiting their civil liberties and duties. This article reviews research on cognitive constructs that can prevent people from processing information that challenges preexisting assumptions about government, dissent, and public discourse in democratic societies. Terror management theory and system justification theory are used to explain how preexisting beliefs can interfere with people’s examination of evidence for state crimes against democracy (SCADs), specifically in relation to the events of September 11, 2001, and the war on terror in Afghanistan and Iraq. Reform strategies are proposed to motivate citizens toward increased social responsibility in a post-9/11 culture of propagandized fear, imperialism, and war.

I understand that it's a difficult matter to deal with, but until we do, we are letting the real terrorist masterminds behind 9/11 win.

Well according to you Rogaine is a conspiracy

No, I know that works, as my father takes the pill form of the active ingredient for hypertension, and he's got a full head of hair now. I just don't give as shit about how much hair I have.

You've changed my mind. Bush blew up the WTC...

You can't rightly blame me for doing that to your mind, as I rather doubt Bush was in on the scheme. Regardless, it's never too late to start electing people who will pull us out of the wars we are blowing trillions of our tax dollars on and reopen the investigation to figure out who actually was behind the attacks. We just need enough people to stand up for the truth and stop electing people who perpetuate the cover-up.

Just because ther terrorists liked stripeprs and alcohol does not take away from the fact they were Islamic...lol

Muslims preparing for martyrdom spend their time praying an such, not getting drunk and hanging out with naked women, both of which are strictly prohibited by Islam.

 

[Patranus]

No, the sequence of explosions I'm referring to was right before WTC 7 came down, which was around 7 hours after the two planes hitting WTC 1 and WTC 2, so you can't rightly blame that on planes.

...ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, I have one final thing I want you to consider. Ladies and gentlemen, this is Chewbacca. Chewbacca is a Wookiee from the planet Kashyyyk. But Chewbacca lives on the planet Endor. Now think about it; that does not make sense!

Damn it!... He's using the Chewbacca defense!

Why would a Wookiee, an eight-foot tall Wookiee, want to live on Endor, with a bunch of two-foot tall Ewoks? That does not make sense! But more important, you have to ask yourself: What does this have to do with this case? Nothing. Ladies and gentlemen, it has nothing to do with this case! It does not make sense! Look at me. I'm a lawyer defending a major record company, and I'm talkin' about Chewbacca! Does that make sense? Ladies and gentlemen, I am not making any sense! None of this makes sense! And so you have to remember, when you're in that jury room deliberatin' and conjugatin' the Emancipation Proclamation, does it make sense? No! Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, it does not make sense! If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must acquit! The defense rests.

---

 

[Sclamoz]

Muslims preparing for martyrdom spend their time praying an such, not getting drunk and hanging out with naked women, both of which are strictly prohibited by Islam.

Also a muslim would never kill another muslim or have sex out of wedlock. Completely true.

 

[SAWYER]

What does your religion say about the treatment of women? beheading? blowing up innocent people?