Originally posted by: Hayabusarider
Looks nice, but I feel that "gently governing" a car is like gently castrating someone. Still, would be fun to drive.
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: Hayabusarider
Looks nice, but I feel that "gently governing" a car is like gently castrating someone. Still, would be fun to drive.
If you can find a place to drive 155MPH on public roads in the US, then be my guest![]()
Originally posted by: NFS4
If you can find a place to drive 155MPH on public roads in the US, then be my guestOriginally posted by: Hayabusarider Looks nice, but I feel that "gently governing" a car is like gently castrating someone. Still, would be fun to drive.![]()
Originally posted by: Triumph
I'd prefer the Golf R32. Essentially the same drivetrains, but I just love Golf's. The TT has a certain persona that just doesn't fit me.
Originally posted by: Hayabusarider
Originally posted by: NFS4
If you can find a place to drive 155MPH on public roads in the US, then be my guestOriginally posted by: Hayabusarider Looks nice, but I feel that "gently governing" a car is like gently castrating someone. Still, would be fun to drive.![]()
That was hardly the point. It is the principle that some agency or auto maker has decided to make a car that can never take advantage of it's potential. Many markets do not have this sort of thing, but because you are from the US you are an inept driver. Perhaps this will become the norm overseas, but that means the lawyers are winning there too. This isnt engineer limited, it is attorney regulated. Doesnt matter if it is ever driven that fast.
Originally posted by: WinkOsmosis
Originally posted by: Triumph
I'd prefer the Golf R32. Essentially the same drivetrains, but I just love Golf's. The TT has a certain persona that just doesn't fit me.
The Golf doesn't have that dual clutch sequential transmission.
What kinda vacation was that? Jail?Originally posted by: Rent
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: Hayabusarider
Looks nice, but I feel that "gently governing" a car is like gently castrating someone. Still, would be fun to drive.
If you can find a place to drive 155MPH on public roads in the US, then be my guest![]()
Its very possible, I found lots of space to do it on my last vacation 🙂
Originally posted by: Hayabusarider
Originally posted by: NFS4
If you can find a place to drive 155MPH on public roads in the US, then be my guestOriginally posted by: Hayabusarider Looks nice, but I feel that "gently governing" a car is like gently castrating someone. Still, would be fun to drive.![]()
That was hardly the point. It is the principle that some agency or auto maker has decided to make a car that can never take advantage of it's potential. Many markets do not have this sort of thing, but because you are from the US you are an inept driver. Perhaps this will become the norm overseas, but that means the lawyers are winning there too. This isnt engineer limited, it is attorney regulated. Doesnt matter if it is ever driven that fast.
Originally posted by: Hayabusarider
Because I have not posted before about something, does not mean I have not taken note of it.![]()
If I were really pissed about it, I would have commented earlier and more often. Perhaps you did not notice that after lamenting this trend, I said it would still be fun to drive? I still do not like it, but I do own a German car and the next will probably be German too. I could always buy a Nissan or something if it were too great a hardship.
Psst, you really love the eye rolly things dont cha? 😛 <----Personally l like this one more.
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: Hayabusarider
Because I have not posted before about something, does not mean I have not taken note of it.![]()
If I were really pissed about it, I would have commented earlier and more often. Perhaps you did not notice that after lamenting this trend, I said it would still be fun to drive? I still do not like it, but I do own a German car and the next will probably be German too. I could always buy a Nissan or something if it were too great a hardship.
Psst, you really love the eye rolly things dont cha? 😛 <----Personally l like this one more.
I really don't see what all the fuss is. Here in the US, we don't have the ability to do 155MPH on a daily basis LEGALLY on the roads. In Germany, they do.
Considering the fact that these cars accel at things that matter given our speed limit restrictions (acceleration/braking/handling/etc.); top speed is more of a "My d!ck if bigger than yours" kinda thing
Originally posted by: arcain
I'm not terribly impressed with the engine, but I'd like to take the transmission for a test drive. I've heard preliminary reviews of it saying that it outshifts BMW's, Aston Martin's, etc (which seems reasonable, those only have one clutch, so they can't shift under load). They also say that the acceleration is amazing in that it just feels like one long surge. That's the part I want to experience.
Originally posted by: Triumph
Originally posted by: arcain
I'm not terribly impressed with the engine, but I'd like to take the transmission for a test drive. I've heard preliminary reviews of it saying that it outshifts BMW's, Aston Martin's, etc (which seems reasonable, those only have one clutch, so they can't shift under load). They also say that the acceleration is amazing in that it just feels like one long surge. That's the part I want to experience.
What's not to be impressed about the engine? 250hp out of 3.2 liters is no joke. That's pretty much right in line with the latest 6 cylinder offerings from Nissan, Acura/Honda, etc. The VR series of engines are the smoothest, most balanced engines this side of the BMW inline 6 (mostly because the VR is only 15 degrees off of the I6). You really need to hear that thing, too. The sound is just awesome from the 2.8 liter 6; I'd wager that the 3.2 has a similar note.
Originally posted by: arcain I am underwhelmed because the engine choice is a minor evolution. I had really hoped for greater showing (though I don't know what would have been a "greater showing"). The TT is near its end of life, so honostly there isn't much left for it.. but I would have preferred to see some sort of RS/S version of it.
It just doesn't seem like that's the road Audi ever intended to go with this car, though. For their halo performance cars, they've got the RS6 etc. The TT has always seemed to be more about style than performance, and I think it's actually succeeded from that perspective.Originally posted by: arcain
I am underwhelmed because the engine choice is a minor evolution. I had really hoped for greater showing (though I don't know what would have been a "greater showing"). The TT is near its end of life, so honostly there isn't much left for it.. but I would have preferred to see some sort of RS/S version of it.
Originally posted by: bigsmooth
It just doesn't seem like that's the road Audi ever intended to go with this car, though. For their halo performance cars, they've got the RS6 etc. The TT has always seemed to be more about style than performance, and I think it's actually succeeded from that perspective.Originally posted by: arcain
I am underwhelmed because the engine choice is a minor evolution. I had really hoped for greater showing (though I don't know what would have been a "greater showing"). The TT is near its end of life, so honostly there isn't much left for it.. but I would have preferred to see some sort of RS/S version of it.
Also, why do you think the TT is "near its end of life"? You mean the current generation, or the model altogether?