ATTO and CDM on x120e with ADATA S510 120GB

zCypher

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2002
6,115
171
116
Howdy y'all,

I ran some benchmarks on my x120e after installing new ram and ssd. Here are the ATTO results: http://s1081.photobucket.com/albums/j350/marcbyron84/?action=view&current=attojan82012s510.jpg

I'll copy paste the CrystalDiskMark results (it saved in txt format):

* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]

Sequential Read : 195.211 MB/s
Sequential Write : 145.696 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 182.830 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 145.515 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 14.498 MB/s [ 3539.6 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 36.186 MB/s [ 8834.4 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 88.355 MB/s [ 21571.0 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 86.927 MB/s [ 21222.5 IOPS]

Test : 1000 MB [C: 29.8% (33.3/111.7 GB)] (x5)
Date : 2012/01/08 2:18:00



* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]

Sequential Read : 190.149 MB/s
Sequential Write : 101.341 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 176.012 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 100.841 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 13.433 MB/s [ 3279.5 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 22.254 MB/s [ 5433.2 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 63.352 MB/s [ 15466.8 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 95.203 MB/s [ 23242.8 IOPS]

Test : 1000 MB [C: 31.9% (35.7/111.7 GB)] (x5)
Date : 2012/01/08 13:43:25

Do those numbers look ok for a 120GB ADATA S510? I'm thinking yes since it's a netbook with SATA2 only. System definitely feels much better than with the 5400rpm drive.

Here's a pic of HWMonitor and CPU-Z: http://s1081.photobucket.com/albums/j350/marcbyron84/?action=view&current=hwmonitorandcpu-z.jpg

Any tips for what to customize/tweak on an E350 system?

PS: for reference, the WD Blue 5400rpm peaked just under 100MB/s in ATTO.
 
Last edited:

groberts101

Golden Member
Mar 17, 2011
1,390
0
0
is similar to all other SF2281 drives using asynch nand.
http://www.pureoverclock.com/article1419.html

those look to be spot on with what would be expected of a sata2 mobile device. Have to keep in mind how all the power considerations(and the expected losses associated with them) would account for some slightly lower marks.

I would check to see if power states in bios can be disabled to let ot stretch its legs a bit better. C-states is usually the one with the most benefit from disabling on these types of drives. Then the usual "high-performance" mode in W7's power options. Hope that helps
 
Last edited: